article from the Harvard Crimson (student paper) website.
I looked everywhere for the evidence of a prank, etc. No such luck.
Apparently they suspended the usual requirement of having to have graduated from college because of special circumstances, ahem.
http://www.thecrimson.com/article.aspx?ref=513563
HBS spokesman James E. Aisner ’68 explained the decision to accept Gottesman, even though he is not a college graduate, by telling The Economist that “extraordinary circumstances will sometimes compel it to drop rule” of only admitting students who hold bachelor's degrees.
He refused to comment specifically on Gottesman, citing Harvard’s policy of not commenting on the admission of any individual student.
Aisner also pointed out to The Economist that Harvard would surely admit applicants like Bill Gates and Michael Dell, both of whom are college dropouts.
But the often-snarky British weekly noted: “Needless to say, holding the president’s hand-sanitizer is a far cry from heading a Fortune 500 company.”
Here's one reader's response, I'm PRETTY SURE he's being sarcastic, but it's so dry it almost made me doubt a little:
RE: Aide’s Acceptance Into Business School A Mocke
It can be argued that because Blake Gottesman did not meet HBS admissions
criteria he neither deserves nor merits being admitted into HBS’ MBA program. While it is true that neither Gottesman nor the nine hundred other applicants
have a right to be admitted, there may be applicants who are clearly more
deserving. One would think that those nine hundred applicants who met the
admissions criteria established by HBS and were not admitted would seem to have
a legitimate grievance should they object to Gottesman's admission. But this is
not necessarily true, as Gottesman’s admission is not a matter of moral dessert but one of entitlement. The HBS website proclaims that “there is no "ideal" admission candidate” and “diversity helps to enrich the learning process for all”. HBS’ decision to omit the requirement of only admitting students who hold bachelor's degrees and the acceptance of Gottesman into the MBA program was obviously in line with the purposes of the university and HBS, “to educate leaders who make a difference in the world” and to have “one of the most
influential alumni networks of any institution in the world”. Gottesman will benefit from a quality education from a prestigious university and Harvard will benefit from Gottesman’s future promise and his rolodex of Washington elites. What’s the problem?
Posted by Pierre Brown | 5/26/2006 7:27:35 PM