Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US forced to import bullets as troops use 250,000 for every Iraqi killed

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 10:51 AM
Original message
US forced to import bullets as troops use 250,000 for every Iraqi killed
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/article314944.ece

US forced to import bullets from Israel as troops use 250,000 for every rebel killed

By Andrew Buncombe in Washington
Published: 25 Septembber 2005

US forces have fired so many bullets in Iraq and Afghanistan - an estimated 250,000 for every insurgent killed - that American ammunition-makers cannot keep up with demand. As a result the US is having to import supplies from Israel.

A government report says that US forces are now using 1.8 billion rounds of small-arms ammunition a year. The total has more than doubled in five years, largely as a result of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, as well as changes in military doctrine.

Article Length: 593 words (approx.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Aiptasia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. War pigs...
This makes me want to listen to black sabbath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. "an estimated 250,000 for every insurgent killed" - Betcha the reprisal...
kill ratio is higher.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
3. "changes in military doctrine"
wonder what that means...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. That one I know
Same process that I understand happened in Vietnam. Early in the war the stress is on "conserve ammo; fire accurately; whites-of-their-eyes" stuff. As the insurgency grows, the doctrine changes to make sure people are putting out a sufficient volume of fire, accurate or not, to stop an approaching attacker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Makes sense...
wonder why we have to buy from Israel, though. They should give them to us for free.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. Especially given that it's Israel
I think the shit would hit the fan even more than it is now if it gets widely known that Iraqis are being killed by Americans firing bullets made in Israel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
4. This is unbelievable...
I can't imagine using a quarter of a million bullets to bring down one person.

Not that I find the article "unbelievable," but unbelievable that we have devolved to this...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scoody Boo Donating Member (634 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Not really that unbelieveable...
they are counting all of the and dividing it by number of known kills. You can have a couple of straffing runs by a couple of Apache gunships against a position manned by a handful of insurgents. That is quite a few thousand rounds right there. The you have the Infantry, who fire a few hundred rounds when they first engaged the enemy and later called for air support. Then you have the infantry come in and mop up firing a few hundred rounds again. In the end you may have one dead and three wounded insurgents with several thousand rounds expended.

Then there is the softening up of targets which takes thousands of rounds fired and maybe one or two insurgents are killed with the rest captured or wounded.

You have units that are rotated out to the rear that still shoot for training. You have support units that do not engage anyone but fire at targets in training. All those rounds go into the total of rounds used against the total body count.

If you take all of the rounds fired in training, rounds fired at euipment that had no one in it, rounds fired at suspicious stuff on the side of the road and counted only the rounds fired in hostilities, the ratio would be much lower.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. Who are insurgents?
These are Iraqis (citizens of Iraq) being slaughtered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scoody Boo Donating Member (634 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. The ones placing IEDs...
Edited on Thu Jun-01-06 12:17 PM by Scoody Boo
in troops paths or pointing AK-47s and RPGs at them are "insurgents." I guess I culd call them "Brave Iraqi Freedom Fighters" but I can't. The bile that rises up in my throat when I even think about trying won't let me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Well it is your government that invaded
their country. What did you expect - garlands of flowers. Oh yes Rummy expected that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scoody Boo Donating Member (634 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. You asked me...
who the insurgents were and I told you. I will always side with American troops against whoever shoots at them. Illegal war or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. I won't and my beloved nephew
was one of them. I side with principle and morality
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. I'm sure there were plenty of good Germans who said the same
about their SS troops.

The only way to support the troops who are fighting an illegal war is to get them the hell out of there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scoody Boo Donating Member (634 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Correct.
Get them out of there, not turn on them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ileus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
5. that's not being very efficient....nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
michreject Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
9. I read months ago
that a contract had been agreed upon between the United States and IMI (Israel) to provide ammo for the US forces but upon further thought, the contract was not fulfilled.

It was decided that using Israeli provided ammo to fight muslims was a bad idea so ammo was procured from another source. As a result of this policy change, IMI ammo is available in the US now. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
10. well, hey, if they're depleted uranium rounds, I'm sure they'll kill more
people later. Or at least cause some birth defects.

Fuckin' trigger happy troops, jeez.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scoody Boo Donating Member (634 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. Depleted uranium rounds are used in...
heavy machine guns and 30mm cannons against armored targets. They have not been using much of it lately.

M-16s and SAWs have never used depleted uranium rounds and that is the great majority of the ammo being used.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mikimouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
11. Why shouldn't they fire so many rounds?
Edited on Thu Jun-01-06 11:35 AM by Mikimouse
After all, reloading only involves pointing the weapon off-screen and pulling the trigger, right?:banghead: I believe that many of themreally do think of it as a video game.?:banghead:

edited for incomplete sentence
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prisoner_Number_Six Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
14. We're obviously not using our WMD to good effect
I say we just nuke 'em and be done with it.

Oops: almost forgot- :sarcasm:

(In case someone here doesn't realize it, yes, I was being facetious.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
15. Gee, outsourcing . . .
didn't we hear some sort of warning about something like this, like, maybe,

THE STEEL INDUSTRY - OUTSOURCING MAKING THE STEEL FOR THE MISSILES WE WOULD BE USING IN WAR?

So now it's bullets . . . somebody get these soldiers some target practice . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sutz12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
20. Peanuts....
IIRC, in Vietnam it was more like 1,000,000. Bullets are cheap. So are brown people.

Maybe we could have the troops pay for their own bullets. That would cut costs, eh?

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ContraBass Black Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
22. I seriously expected this to be from the Onion.
Damn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC