Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

An infiltrator is blogging Yearly Kos

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 12:44 PM
Original message
An infiltrator is blogging Yearly Kos
From a Malkin linked site called Hot Air. (really - that's the name) I don't begrudge them their curiosity. It must be dull for them, though, since the two-headed giants and ladies with beards stayed home-

snips>
Here are the first three dispatches from our man on the inside. Nothing too freaky as of yet, although there has been a Wonkette sighting. The heavy hitters don’t get going until tomorrow, so stay tuned......
...
People here are largely, disappointingly, golf-shirted, short-haired, and white bread. Grooming and hygiene are up to western business standards. There is one dude wearing a pith helmet and another guy in a kilt, but the freakish T-shirts I brought along a camera for are not popping up. Oh, I spoke too soon, there’s a girl in an I HAD AN ABORTION t-shirt. For such a routine, ordinary, medical procedure she seems awfully proud of it. Can I get an “I HAD A TONSILLECTOMY” shirt?


You bet! Hell, as soon as your right to get a tonsillectomy is threatened, I'll wear one for you.

On the other hand there’s a buzz-cut grey-templed fellow in a pinstripe suit and an American flag tie. Hmm…maybe they’re catching on. The media is here pretty strong, so maybe they cleaned up and want to look respectable.

So far, and maybe it’s the character of the particular panels I’ve been to, people are pretty nice........


Hellions! Normally dressed, "nice" hellions.

Byron York at NRO strains, at first, to insult the organizers for placing reasonable restrictions on reporters like "Maureen Dowd of the New York Times, Ana Marie Cox of Time, Matt Labash of The Weekly Standard, and others" (the Bloggeratti!). But the sense of the limitations are then made clear-

After a good deal of back-and-forth, it became clear that organizers weren’t so much running a secret society—that did seem a little out of place at a highly publicized political bloggers gathering—as they were concerned about privacy of the participants. They were amateur commentators from all around the country—teachers, activists, lawyers—who, in the training session, were going to sit in front of a camera and practice their punditry techniques, interviewed by one of the trainers from the Center. What if they messed up, or said something embarrassing? There was no reason to quote them by name, was there?

That seemed reasonable, so an agreement was reached. No names would be used. And then the Center for American Progress trainers asked that their names not be used, either. Echoing Vice President Dick Cheney and others who have defended Bush administration secrecy policies, the trainers said they wanted to be able to give candid advice without being quoted by name.


Um, how can anyone equate limited access for a think tank's seminar of teachers, activists and lawyers with the vice preznit? or with the secret activities of our own government?

Pretty good coverage, on the whole, I'd say.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MamaBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's such hard work
It's just such hard work to criticize citizens practicing citizenship. Poor, poor wingnuts! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Please keep us posted
Maybe some folks can do an intervention and save this poor fellow's soul?

He's already starting to soften by admitting that gee whiz these liberals are sure nice folks.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. If wingnuts go to these things, they are likely to switch sides...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. There's an update- (comes with a freak alert)
In this report, the blogger anxiously updates his post with a tip from a reader to some gushing by someone who met Wilson. Not too intrepid, our ace, if he couldn't ferret out any Wilson admiration on the scene. (I know I'd be tripping over people to buy Joe a drink)

But the reader who so anxiously mocks the enthusiasm of others is rather interesting -and by "interesting", I mean frightfully disturbed. (this gets a little gruesome, so quit here if you'd rather not be exposed to it- I understand completely)

In checking a few random posts on his blog I came across this satire piece he'd written. In it a pharaoh type Bush-god puts Janeane Garofalo through a shredder (a photo is captioned "An industrial shredder, much like the one that will convert the popular funnywoman into a ropy bone-flecked paste"), then calls for Michael Moore to be burned alive and for Tim Robbins to be beheaded.

So how bad can a little teasing be, right doctor? SHEESH! And this FREAK wants to turn around and try to appear more reasonable/hip/sane than someone who...who...openly admires someone?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. Ha! Froomkin called Judy Miller a “discredited shill”.
snip>
WaPo guy Dan Froomkin credits Murray Waas’s research with leaving Judy Miller a “discredited shill”. All these guys on this panel are anti-”Mainstream Media”; even Froomkin referred to the “MSM” and explained how since he worked online he was almost one of you . Interesting: he says the White House Press Corps isn’t conservative. There’s something to be said to the critique that the press is liberal and is bending over backwards from being perceived as liberal. But he added that maybe now after Plamegate they’ll fear the left-wing blogosphere as well.

http://hotair.com/archives/the-blog/2006/06/09/infiltrating-yearly-kos-the-taunting-of-byron-york/

I agree with the bold part. Most reporters in the traditional media self-identify as dems. Some aren't, of course (most on Fox, matthews, etc) but they really have fallen prey to an appetite for "balance" as opposed to sanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnnInLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-09-06 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
6. I've seen a bunch of reports from "RW moles" at the
Kos convention today. For the RWers to be so dismissive of the DailyKos kids (progressive libs) and call them brats and claim they are irrelevant, they sure going to alot of trouble to infiltrate and report. Even Byron York is there and posting at National Review about the activities. All the mole reports that I've seen are surprised that all of the participants are so "normal" in appearance. What were they expecting....a bunch of hippies, people with horns and tails? These people are very nervous about the progressives in the Dem party!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC