Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What PNAC wants, PNAC gets --- Zarqawi, Iran and Tinfoil

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
LunaC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-11-06 03:12 PM
Original message
What PNAC wants, PNAC gets --- Zarqawi, Iran and Tinfoil
The “diplomacy” angle is just a ruse…..Iran is on the PNAC Hit List and what PNAC wants, PNAC gets. They staged 911 to get to Iraq and they’ll stage something else to get to Iran. They’ll cleverly paint the military honchos into a corner so there’s no choice but to do their bidding.

Bush Said To Be Seeking “Persian Gulf Incident"

Remember the Maine? Remember the Maddox? US military leaders now fear that a copycat Cuban or Tonkin Gulf incident will be either faked or provoked sometime soon in the ship-clogged Persian Gulf.

Once an Iranian attack on a US-flagged tanker or warship is announced, US commanders could be ordered to “counter-attack” with all available force—including nuclear weapons. Even if they suspected a ruse, no serving soldier can fail to protect his or her comrades. Any grunt or general who refused such a “go” command would risk immediate courts-martial, and charges of treason in a time of war.
]

http://newswire.indymedia.org/en/2006/05/839133.shtml

Considering the timing, suspicious circumstances and ever-changing official story surrounding Zarqawi‘s death, I wouldn’t be the least bit surprised if They use it to their advantage by staging an attack on one of our ships in the Gulf, blaming it on "insurgents" bent on revenge, and somehow tying it to Iran. Nothing happens by accident or coincidence with the * Cabal, nor do they let “opportunities” get past them.

Tinfoil or prescient?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-11-06 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Is that why the USS Cole is being sent back to the Persian Gulf?
I heard that this week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LunaC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-11-06 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Didn't know about USS Cole
I knew USS Abraham Lincoln and the USS Enterprise were headed for the Western Pacific and Middle East to join the USS Ronald Reagan already operating in the Gulf. Is this type of naval presence SOP?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tocqueville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-11-06 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. complete tinfoil
they don't need Zarquawi to attack Iran. Specially when this later one officially despised and attacked Iran and killed Shiites.

the nuclear story was sufficient. But the US has changed its policies against Iran recently. It might even been so that it is the Iranians that turned in Zarquawi to get a better nuclear deal.

Indymedia isn't a reliable source
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LunaC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-11-06 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. When did Zarqawi attack Iran?
Jordanian intelligence believes Iran encouraged Zarqawi to organize violent resistance to the American occupation of Iraq.

...while high-level Iranian-government backing for al-Zarqawi is not substantiated, U.S. intelligence can't rule out the possibility that he might have "friends here and there."

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6262451/site/newsweek/

Watch this morph into "Iran sponsors terrorists" if an "Event" occurs in the Gulf.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tocqueville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-11-06 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. read Asia Times, they are well informed
In a recent audio message, Zarqawi not only attacked the US and the Sh'ite-dominated government in Iraq, but also Iran. He had even claimed that the US, Iran and Shi'ites in general were collaborating to destroy Islam. He has also plainly called for continued attacks against Shi'ites and called Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani an "an atheist".

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/HF09Ak03.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LunaC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-11-06 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Conflicting reports - who to believe?
I guess we'll just have to wait and see what excuse * uses when he decides to add Iran to his "Mission Accomplished" list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philosoraptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-11-06 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. We will refer back to this post after it happens.
And you can start a new career as a soothsayer. It's coming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-11-06 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
8. We flew hundreds of missions over iraq hoping hussein would take
the bait. Trouble is, I think the Iranians want it badder than we do.

Betcha this one backfires. It will cost the GOP the congress. Don't they ever learn?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-11-06 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Wrong...the GO Pee owns the voting machines and is ready to steal 2006/8
Nobody is really doing anything about it...democracy is in a coma at this point...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LunaC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-11-06 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Iran is ready and waiting.......
Iran has been quietly restructuring its military, while carrying out a series of military exercises testing its new military dogma. In December, more than 15,000 members of the regular armed forces participated in war games in northwestern Iran's strategically sensitive East Azerbaijan and West Azerbaijan border provinces that focused on irregular warfare carried out by highly mobile and speedy army units.

In another telling development, a second exercise was launched in the majority-Arab province of Khuzestan, reportedly aimed at quelling insurgencies in areas subject to ethnic unrest and prone to foreign influence. Involving 100,000 troops, the exercise provided a taste of how the Islamic Republic would respond to further disturbances in the strategic, oil-rich province.

The exercise came on the heels of news that the irregular Basij forces that led Iran's offensives against Iraq were being bolstered by so-called Ashura battalions with riot-control training.

It is all part of a fundamental transition that Iran's Revolutionary Guard (RG) is undergoing as it moves away from focusing on waging its defense of the country on the borders - unrealistic in view of the vast territory that requires securing and the gulf separating Iranian and US military capabilities - and toward drawing the enemy into the heartland and defeating it with asymmetrical tactics.


more.....
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/HE24Ak05.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-11-06 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
9. PNAC has been driving the train since 1998
No surprise...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC