Shrub doesn't want the American people to think that a war is

won with the death of one person.... geeez.... ya think??? How about with the death of 3000 American kids.... the loss of 10,000 limbs, the needless deaths of tens of thousands of civilians, how about with thousands of DU related birth defects, or perhaps a massacre here and there, what about winning the war on unnecessary deaths here in the U.S. by getting the healthcare system fixed... only about 18,000 people expire each year due to poor, or more than likely no healthcare whatsoever.

How about winning the war on poverty, instead of a war of your choosing against an enemy that didn't exist for the most part until you decided to stick your fingers in someone elses pie. How about all the tens of thousands of Middle Easterners who are now dead and who will be dead because they don't like the idea of even further U.S. meddling in the ME.

How about the fact that Russia is now pretty much pissed at our moves, and if we keep it up with Iran, China may be next. Winning a war on terror is like trying to put out a grassfire with gasoline. There can only be a war on injustice, or GW had better be ready to do a whole lot of unnecessary killing in the next couple of years. Quite simply, they are tired of our sh*t.

After all, even if IRAQ is problematic for him, the WOT is still his biggest claim to power...

sinful skirts of his war whore.

nuf said!

:thumbsup: :hi:

do nothing but hang out and get killed by al Qaeda.

Middle-class and lower- jobs program, Republican style.

The only Education you can count on the State actually helping out with - Brutal ECONOMIC realities that grow out of "Savage In-Equalities", i.e. the mechanism that controls the ignorant and un-skilled and sends them to kill or be killed for Big Businesses that purchase "our" government.