Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CNN: Al Qaeda documents outline serious weapons program - January 25, 2002

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-11-06 03:18 PM
Original message
CNN: Al Qaeda documents outline serious weapons program - January 25, 2002
http://archives.cnn.com/2002/US/01/24/inv.al.qaeda.documents/index.html

ATLANTA, Georgia (CNN) -- The al Qaeda terrorist organization was building a serious weapons program with a heavy emphasis on developing a nuclear device, according to an exhaustive review of documents discovered in Afghanistan.

The apparent al Qaeda documents were found in a Kabul house reportedly used by al Qaeda operatives. Afghan police took CNN to the house soon after the Taliban withdrew from the city in November.

"I don't have any doubt that al Qaeda was pursuing nuclear, biological and chemical warfare capabilities. It's not our judgment at the moment that they were that far along, but I have no doubt that they were seeking to do so," U.S. Undersecretary of State John Bolton told CNN on Thursday. "It underlines just how serious the threat of the use of these weapons of mass destruction could be, and why it's such an important part of the global campaign against terrorism."

Investigations are continuing into the information found in al Qaeda camps in Afghanistan and into how close the group was to gaining nuclear and biological weapons capabilities, Bolton said.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2001/11/20/wbin120.xml

Al-Qa'eda's atom plans were spoof science

20/11/2001

DOCUMENTS found last week in an al-Qa'eda safe house in Afghanistan that purport to be instructions on how to build a nuclear weapon were shown yesterday to be based on a spoof scientific article.

The "plans" were discovered in a ruined house in Kabul after the Taliban fled the city, and included notes ostensibly showing how to create a nuclear device. snip

Jason Scott, of the internet newsletter rotten.com, said he had searched the internet for the phrases used in the documents, which were in English, and found they were the same as a well known 1979 spoof article. Among the tell-tale references were to "theory of operation - the device basically works".

The original, entitled How To Build An Atomic Bomb In 10 Easy Steps, described how to create a device for between $5,000 (£3,000) and $30,000 that "is a great ice-breaker at parties, and in a pinch, can be used for national defence".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-11-06 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. And yes someone did call me a conspiracy theorist when I called BS on this
Some people never learn.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-11-06 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. If you have proof, like you did above...
no one will call you anything, but on the ball.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-11-06 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. I know.....
I wish folks could understand that some of us have been watching these folks since Clinton impeachment and there is more evidence that they lie constantly than there ever is that they tell the truth. It's not being a conspiracy theorist when you've seen a pattern time after time with these people and when one knows how the Media operates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-11-06 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. (K& R) Wow! That is complete bullshit coming out of Bolton...
Edited on Sun Jun-11-06 03:27 PM by originalpckelly
And there was an article contradicting it, published in November the preceding year. WOW!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-11-06 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. At that time everyone was afraid to question Bush and his goons
Whatever they said was believed automatically. I posted a link and excerpts from the spoof article here on GD at the time this came out before the news organizations picked up on it. That thread was immediately removed by the moderators. That was the mind set even here back then. It was don't question our Crackhead in Chief or his minions. The monkey had a 90% approval rating because he stayed on vacation and let 3000 people die. I don't want to ever go there again.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niallmac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-11-06 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. Thank god John Bolton feels honor bound to correct his errors
about WMD/Al Queda etc etc...
NOT!

Hey, didn't I just post this about the MSM?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
biscotti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-11-06 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
7. They have made ,anything they say
Unbelievable! They have cried wolf way to many times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-11-06 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Yes but at least we know when they are lying now
If their lips are moving they are lying.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC