Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

South Central Farm Eviction in Process Now!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Richard D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 10:00 AM
Original message
South Central Farm Eviction in Process Now!
Despite weeks of negotiations, getting funding to purchase the land, and really putting their hearts and lives on the line, the farmers and their supporters are being evicted from the South Central Farm right now. A true gem and beautiful example of what cooperation and working together can accomplish is going to be destroyed to build a fucking Walmart warehouse.


Please fax or email city hall ask Mayor Villaraigosa to continue peaceful negotiations for purchase of the 14 acres of farmland in urban South Central LA. The mailbox on the phone is full and no one is answering.

mayor@lacity.org


CITY HALL

200 North Spring Street, Room 303
Los Angeles, CA 90012

Mayor's Staff Roster
213/978-0600 (Phone)
213/978-0750 (Fax)


* * * * * * *

Press Release
SOUTH CENTRAL FARMERS
Tuesday June13
Media Contact Fernando Flores 909-605-3136 Leslie Morava (310) 428-9380
Harold Linde 323-382-7554






URGENT BREAKING NEWS


SOUTH CENTRAL FARMERS EVICTION HAPPENING NOW
5 A.M. SQUADRON OF HELICOPTERS & SQUAD CARS CAME TO EVICT FARMERS & PEACEFUL SUPPORTERS

WHEN: Tuesday June 13, NOW

WHAT: Eviction of South Central Farmers and Supporters
Darryl Hannah and John Quigley still inside the property, other peaceful protestors conducting nonviolent civil disobedience.

WHERE: South Central Farm
4000 S. Long Beach Ave.
Los Angeles, CA 90058
(Media enter on 40th Pl. through Long Beach Ave. Park on 41st )

WHY:
For over three weeks supporters have been onsite at the South Central Farm, the nation’s largest urban farm, which serves as a 14-acre oasis in the middle of L.A.’s concrete jungle. This 14-year-old community gem functions as an active farm for more than 350 families and fills a local need for fresh produce, green space and a safe haven in a poverty-stricken region of Los Angeles. The farmers, community volunteers and celebrity supporters are in a daily state of peril anxiously awaiting the farm’s fate.


“The South Central Farm is a gem in the Los Angeles landscape. It supplies local communities with fresh, organic produce, gives children a safe environment to play and learn in, and provides a successful example of urban sustainability for the rest of the world to follow…”
- Dr. Joseph Hurwitz, Rabbi Emeritus, Temple Isaiah, Palm Springs

###
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
oscar111 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. RECOMMEND BUTTON bott of orig post
hit it pls
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lochloosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Done!
Walmart is the Beast!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oc2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #2
45. and Horrowitz, the land owners.

http://www.contactmusic.com/new/xmlfeed.nsf/mndwebpages/hannah%20joins%20baez%20for%20urban%20farm%20protest_27_05_2006

Owner ROB HOROWITZ insists the best way celebrities could have helped the cause was by digging deep and helping fund non-profit group The Trust For Public Land's failed bid to buy the site. In a statement released yesterday (26MAY06), Horowitz said, "It would be nicer if all those theatrical people would have volunteered to make a contribution to the trust so they can buy the property. "None of them have offered. They have all refused to contribute. If they really wanted to help, that's the way they could have helped."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oscar111 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
3. I just sent my email.. anyone else yet?
such farms bring peace to dificult parts of town.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Soloflecks Donating Member (518 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Not prize-winning, but I did send one.
Right. Just let your citizens eat concrete. And after Walmart arrives they can help pay the welfare costs for all those workers who won’t be able to afford health insurance and whose minimum wage jobs won’t pay for both housing and groceries. And let’s not forget that Walmart has used illegals, is not environmentally aware, supports sweatshops, sells nothing made in America (their former slogan Made in America, hah), lowers property values, and gee, is there really anything good about Walmart except the illusion that it will fill your coffers with fresh tax dollars, I’m not in California, but it’s appalling to see the needs and wants of citizens of all the states being sacrificed for corporate interests.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oscar111 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
4. Walmart's action is just unbelievable. They ought to plan some
Edited on Tue Jun-13-06 10:15 AM by oscar111
better way to place a warehouse.

When i was in NY city, a visit to the green space of Central Park had a remarkably calming effect on my nerves.

Man was not meant to live in a concrete jungle. We evolved amid leaves, and we seem to need leafy trees to stay calm and cheery.

Many are those on the LW who have planned ways to end cities. A good idea. Some time in the future, let robots in the city factories do all the work, while man spends his time relaxing in the rural woodlands and enjoying good conversation over grape juice and cheese. { I am not a fan of booze, its drunk drivers and mean drunks}.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikeh420 Donating Member (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
29. not Wal-Mart
for once, I don't think Wal-Mart is behind this one, it's an individual person that owns the land, Ralph Horowitz. The land was STOLEN from him under dubious eminent domain (the way the City of L.A. generally does things, "below board", as opposed to "above board"). The deal with the city's developer/campaign contributor then fell through, so Horowitz bought the land back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #29
49. Hi mikeh420!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrPrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
5. Why can't poor people
get 14 acres of land to farm?

You'd think a few Hollywood liberals with 'walking 'round' money could have taken care of all this months ago, put their name on a plaque and proclaim a bright shiny future--but NO...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. They've raised the money . . .
. . . the owner just won't sell it to the farmers. Too much bad blood. Too much greed.

Just to clarify, it's not Walmart who owns the land, it's a developer named Ralph Horowitz.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. Horowitz...hmmmm. Is this guy a republicon?
Sure sounds like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. Sounds like a real slum lord.
Too bad I'm a thousand miles away and can't help. Best of luck to everybody there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oc2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #5
46. or that fat greedy fuck Horrowtz could just donate to the city?

Why reward fat greedy fuckers like Horrowtz?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
6. Where are the supporters of the "families who would lose their farms"
and the "eminent domain is evil" crowd when it's Wal-Mart using the iron fist wrapped in dollar bills versus a poor community?

Strangely quiet over there . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oscar111 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Evictions from family farms ENDED by Huey Long
a good idea then, and still is.

did you know ... AFAIK... every large town's police force has an "eviction squad" that does nothing but go around all day throwing families into the street, and leaving all their stuff on the curb for them to carry off if they can, and the trashman to get, if the evicted cannot carry it all fast? It is a crime IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. Depends on where you live
In CA the landlord is required to store any abandoned property that isn't obviously trash for several weeks after an eviction or any other termination of tenancy. In my experience the stuff is rarely picked up (actually when I was working as a property manager I don't think I ever had a tenant collect thier property after moving out, though I did have one come back and scream at me almost a year after her eviction for not having her stuff anymore.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
10. Why must so many good things be destroyed....
America is turning, more and more, into a nightmare for so many.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oscar111 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. "unpoliced areas of LA" ? true?
while you LA folks are here, pls verify or not..

are there parts of LA where the police have informally decided not to regularly patrol and control? Because gangs are so powerful in those areas and dangerous?

I seem to recall reading that years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikeh420 Donating Member (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #11
28. not sure
I don't think there are areas where the LAPD doesn't patrol, if anything these areas get more police presence not less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Throd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #11
38. Not true
I have spent time in some of LA's biggest shitholes. There are cops everywhere. Now what they do there is another question...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 03:37 AM
Response to Reply #11
41. I've only heard that about Terminal Island n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
13. Done - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bacchus39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
16. story
it appears the city used eminent domain to force Horowitz to sell to build an incinerator. the project fell through and Horowitz sued to get it back. He bought it back for 5 million.

he offered the farmers to purchase it for $16 million. they didn't come up with all the money.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060613/ap_on_re_us/urban_garden
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
High Plains Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. The farmers came up with $6 million, $1.2 million more than he
paid for it. Horowitz wanted to make a $10 million profit off the farmers. Fuck that pig.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. He wanted to sell it for its current value.
I sold my last house to a young couple for $355,000, even though I only paid $225,000 for it. Why? Because the market had climbed and the value of the house had increased since I purchased it. You could easily make the argument that I profited $130,000 off of a couple who really couldn't afford it. Does that make me a pig too?

Horowitz offered to sell the land for its current market value. Unless you can show that he was jacking the price over market just to screw with them, I don't see where he did anything wrong by asking $16 million for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #18
36. And the farmers came up with the full amount he was asking . . .
. . . as of several days ago. And he wouldn't sell it to them at any price. Hatred, pure and simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oc2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #18
47. He paid 5 million, and wants to sell it for 16 million. GREED IS GOOD

Horowitz is a greedy fucker, plain and simple. It not the farmers, the families and the people who live there for years going to come up with that kind of money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bacchus39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. the city is at fault here
I have no sympathy for Horowitz but its his land.

the city expropriated the land for the trash incinerator and then the project fell through they gave it to another agency. he sued and bought it back.

I blame the city.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikeh420 Donating Member (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #19
27. 14 acres is no small potatoes
This is a big chunk of land, not a single family home sized lot, it's 14 acres, (the average home sized lot is 1/8 to 1/5 of an acre). That's worth alot even in South Central. $16 million sounds fair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #17
35. In the last days,
the Annenberg Foundation agreed to donate/loan the remaining monies needed to match the 16 plus million that horoshit wanted. He refused just because he could and just because he really wanted to hurt the farmers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DesertRat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
20. Wow. Watching CNN now
33 people have been arrested already. Darryl Hannah is tied up in a walnut tree. The CNN anchors are laughing about it. F them!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flubadubya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. You're absolutely right, shame on CNN anchors (biased BS'ers)...
But "Darryl Hannah is tied up in a walnut tree" does make me chuckle a bit. :+
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 07:06 AM
Response to Reply #21
43. I would love to have a free swing at Kyra
I would make the most of it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
22. KPFK is doing special coverage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smokey nj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
23. Could the city have used eminent domain on behalf of the farmers
I'd say a community farm is far more beneficial than a Wal-fucking-mart warehouse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bacchus39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. that's what they did to take the land from Horowitz in the first place
the basis for taking the land as a public need for the gardeners would be dubious since the public benefit would not extend much beyond those who are currently utilizingng the property.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K-W Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #24
32. Public use, not public need is the standard.
Edited on Tue Jun-13-06 06:36 PM by K-W
Regardless, something need not effect the entire public to be public.

Preserving a community garden would certainly qualify.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #24
34. Not true
The farmers had plans drawn up to include a community center, two soccer fields, and a job training center as part of the master plan for the farms future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #23
33. The farm is right next door to a wrecking yard
And the entire area around it is used by warehouses, wrecking yards, shipping operations and it's right beside a stinky river of street run-off we laughingly call the "Los Angeles River". Sure the community farm is perhaps nicer than a wrecking yard, but the owner has a right to fair market value as well. I'd like to hear of a developer buying it for fair market value and selling leaseholds on the property for farming. That way everyone would win, but I bet then the farmers would not be willing or perhaps able to pay for the leaseholds.... it's not as black and white as it seems...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #33
37. Once again . . .
. . . the full amount Horoshits was asking was raised by the farmers. 16 million plus. But he wanted to destroy the farm and would not sell it to them at any price.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 03:38 AM
Response to Reply #23
42. Didn't that recently work to stop a Wally_world in MN?
I seem to recall reading something about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
25. Very sad!
:(

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikeh420 Donating Member (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
26. Why can't these so-called stars cut a check?
Why can't Darryl Hanna and her friends put their money where their mouths are? They could easily cut a check for this guy and keep the land as is. But if they did then they couldn't get all the P.R. thay are getting now hanging in trees. $16 Million is pocket change to these people. This Horowitz guy got screwed over by the City of L.A. once already when they STOLE his land, he just wants to make some money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlavesandBulldozers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. damn hollywood Lie-bruls
always out for PR, and don't really care one whit about anybody but themselves.

Am I right;) ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #30
39. No.
In this case at least you are totally wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #26
40. Many people cut checks . . .
. . . and the full amount of money was raised. The owner just refused to sell it to them at any price as he wanted basic, hateful revenge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oc2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #26
48. because greedy people like Horrowitz should not be rewarded.

If you can not see that, well, then your part of the problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Little Star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-13-06 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
31. I'm sure Hannity and Combs will be right on this, right! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oc2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
44. This is where it hurts that ARNALD will not stop this greedy developer.

If anyone wanted to know why you want a liberal democrat in ofice, its to stop the greedy bastards like Horowitz and company.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yollam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
50. Done.
I hope they win out. Time is short it seems...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC