Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fitzgerald did not close the door entirely (firedoglake)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 11:39 AM
Original message
Fitzgerald did not close the door entirely (firedoglake)
............First of all, now Luskin is saying that he received a FAX from Fitzgerald. So, we’ve heard phone call (in the television reporting), letter (NYTimes) and now FAX from Time Magazine’s Mike Allen.

Second, there is this paragraph:

Luskin had just received a fax from Patrick Fitzgerald, the special counsel in the case, saying that he was formally notifying Luskin that absent any unexpected developments, he does not anticipate seeking any criminal charges against Rove. (emphasis mine)


Translation: if I get solid evidence that your client lied to me, all bets are off.

Fitzgerald did not close the door entirely — no prosecutor ever does, since you never know what will turn up in the next document dump or investigative interview — so in order for Rove to be entirely in the clear for the long haul, he’d best have told the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. Can the same be said for Dick Cheney and others in the case? Time will tell.

Is Fitzgerald likely to charge Rove at this point? No, or he wouldn’t have sent the fax. But the investigation ends when Fitzgerald says it has and, frankly, there has been no announcement to that effect. (Nor will there be until, at the earliest, the end of the Libby matter. And won’t that be some fun testimony…) And everything points to the fact that things are continuing, since Fitzgerald’s spokesperson, Russell Samborn, is still in no comment mode, among other things.

But if evidence is found which shows that Rove lied or in some way obstructed the case? Well, that’s a FAX of a different color.

http://www.firedoglake.com/category/cia-leak-case/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. Link to the Time article mentioned:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. I wonder if she read my post yesterday? :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. it looks mighty similar!
good catch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. I know I did
It had me thinking on this all night
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I did, too,
and have the honor of sending this one off to the greatest.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Have you come up with any conclusions?
I always look out for your insight...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. yes these posts pretty much sum up what I am thinking
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=364&topic_id=1421768&mesg_id=1421768

my thoughts/response to this

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=364&topic_id=1421768&mesg_id=1424989

and then this by leveymg which includes emptywheel coupled that with what FDL is saying and everyone seems to be coming to the same conclusion, also there are some good thinkers chiming in on this

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=364&topic_id=1425523&mesg_id=1425523

in fact I don't know what else I could add to this thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Sabra
that WAS a really interesting thread.

You ask the best ?s...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Kpete
Thanks, much appreciated. BTW, :yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
6. I got part of this right, but who can get all of it in one pass?
Edited on Wed Jun-14-06 11:57 AM by Patsy Stone
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=364&topic_id=1415401&mesg_id=1415450

It seemed more than a little off that Bob wouldn't have plastered this letter all over the damn place.

I heart FDL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleRob Donating Member (893 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
8. FDL is always the best source for Fitz related info - N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
11. absent any unexpected developments
I'm willing to bet that there really is a sealed indictment for Rove, and if Rove even thinks about double-crossing Fitz, ole Fitz will not hesitate to formally indict Rove.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
speedoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Can someone please define "IIPA". Thanks, nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Intelligence Identities Protection Act -- Here:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Intelligence Identities Protection Act of l982 ("IIPA")
you could google for more info, my knowledge is limited.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC