Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

gynophobia - a disorder among conservatives

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 02:33 PM
Original message
gynophobia - a disorder among conservatives
gynophobia or gynephobia (jyn-uh-FO-bee-uh, gyn-) noun

The fear of women.



Today's word in Visual Thesaurus: http://visualthesaurus.com/?w1=gynophobia

-Anu Garg (gargATwordsmith.org)

"Precluding women from such positions of leadership is not theologically
substantiated, but a clear manifestation of misogyny and gynophobia."
Kudakwashe Chirambwi; Church Should Welcome Women Into Leadership;
The Herald (Harare, Zimbabwe); Nov 5, 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. I thought this was just "THE patriarchy"
now I am so confused :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. I wrote this up on Georgie last year
Gynophobia: A morbid fear of women

George Bush had an opportunity to meet with Cindy Sheehan today, or even answer her questions. Simple questions really, arising from Bush's comments last week that soldiers in Iraq & Afghanistan died for a "noble cause" in the "war on terror", once again linking Iraq and 9/11. Cindy's two questions that are baffling the War President: What is noble about the cause, now that we know there were never WMD in Iraq? If the cause is noble, why aren't the twins in Iraq? Of course, he didn't do either.

Today it was about "sending the wrong message" to terrorists, despite the fact that they are increasing in number as a result of the Iraq war. He avoided Cindy's questions, just like he's avoided Cindy herself.

That's nothing new though, I can't think of a President who has exhibited more difficulty in dealing with women than George Bush has. When he can't avoid women altogether, he chooses mockery and denigration instead. Who can forget the Letterman appearance where he used Maria Pope's sweater to clean his glasses? Secretary Rice is relegated to "Condi", Laura is a "lump", the twins have the "whining" pool, he even flipped off Karen Hughes.

Last November, Bush refused an invitation to speak to a joint session of the Canadian Parliament. Since Canada had just politely received Vincente Fox of Mexico, it is unlikely there would have been anything but a mannerly reception. The only real threat to that possibility was Carolyn Parrish, a strong critic of Bush who called him a warlike man after the 2004 election. This vocal member of the House of Commons has also been a strong critic of the war, labeling the nations supporting Bush's war the "coalition of the idiots".

He's been confronted about his habit of avoiding female reporters, as well, on more than one continent even. In his June 1 press conference, he asked a question of only 1 woman. He followed up during a stop in Denmark, by blundering a question to "Reuters man, Toby"; who happens to be a woman.

In 2003, Helen Thomas was relegated to the third row of a Presidential press conference for daring to utter 3 little words a few day earlier, specifically that George Bush was the "worst President ever". Yes, Ms. Thomas, then 82 years old, and 3 little words were enough to send the "decisive" and "courageous" President Bush into a complete meltdown. For 57 years, Ms. Thomas had been a staple at White House press conferences, closing them with her traditional "Thank you, Mr. President.". It was the first press conference since JFK that hadn't included one of her questions.

Then there was Irish reporter, Carole Coleman, who dared to actually do her job and ask probing questions in a ten minute interview last June. Bush's response was not just to avoid Ms.Coleman in the future, but to file a formal complaint with the Irish Embassy in Washington. The complaint, that she interrupted Bush, couldn't have been received as anything more than "she was mean to me."

His ultimate disrespect for women may well be in his treatment of Carla Faye Tucker. Not enough to simply reject her appeal for clemency; it was reported in Talk magazine that in a subsequent interview, he pursed his lips in mimicry of Tucker, and said in a simpering voice, "Please, please don't kill me." It is telling that of all the clemency requests he received, he chose to mock the one from the first woman to be executed in Texas in 100 years.

It is obvious that meeting with Cindy was discussed at length and various options considered, otherwise Stephen Hadley wouldn't have been dispatched on the first day of her vigil. What hasn't been asked is who made the decision for Stephen to go, and why him? Was it "compassionate conservatism", an attempt to heed Cindy's call to have "the courtesy and the integrity and the compassion" to talk to her. Or was it just another case of gynophobia for the Coward of Crawford.


http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2005/8/11/201436/095
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Excellent! I hadn't seen this!
Thanks for bringing my attn to it. Heh...it's so damn true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I thought it was
Maybe if Arianna wrote it... :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 04:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC