Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"We like to eat whale meat"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Cetacea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 06:30 AM
Original message
"We like to eat whale meat"
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000101&sid=atOBZqyZCvJg&refer=japan

Fuck the Japanese government. They have been trying to reverse the International Ban on Whaling since it's inception. Looks like they may succeed this year. Fucking cannibals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 06:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. Cannibals? I do not think that word means what you think it means. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cetacea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 06:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. ok then. Genocide
They know perfectly well how closely the whale brain resembles our own. They also know that it is more complexly developed than ours and that they feel pain.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. They are not trying to wipe out whales
Then there would be no more whales to eat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. We weren't trying to wipe out a lot of animals.
They're gone just the same.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. The point being
Genocide has a definition. It is eliminating a group completely or at least trying to. Pedantic point but I am a small man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 06:38 AM
Response to Original message
2. Well, they're not cannibals, actually...
but I get your drift.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cetacea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 06:45 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. If sentient, intelligent beings that do not bare any outward
resemblance to us, came to earth and we ruthlessly slaughtered them, then what would be a proper term be for that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 06:46 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. A ruthless slaughter.
Edited on Fri Jun-16-06 06:47 AM by Bluebear
Cannibalism refers to a lifeform that consumes its own kind. But I don't want to dilute your message, more power to you. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cetacea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 06:50 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Agreed , wrong usage. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 07:55 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I thought your initial use of the word was very clear. I took it to
mean that whales are so close to use genetically that it was "cannibalism" in a more general sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OwnedByFerrets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 08:01 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Yes,
My wife and I were talking about this yesterday. I cant believe that in 2006 we still have a whale killing industry. It really saddens the heart. Its also sad that the polar bears HAVE turned to cannibalism to survive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cetacea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. You are correct. Thanks.
I guess one could call then "neurological cousins".
(more so in the case of dolphins).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Far_Rider Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
10. Norwegians love whalemeat.
"Intelligent food for intelligent people".
I'm sorry to say that this does not apply to all my countrymen. Some of them are still blinded by their political bias and complete lack of knowledge or grasp for reality.

But whalemeat is still pretty good though. Healthy, nutrisious, and we help keep the ecologiacal balance in the sea. Here's the deal. Both men and whales eat fish. Whaling is fobidden because of exhausting the numbers of whales. More fish will come. No more whaling: Our natural competitor will eat a lot more fish. Both whales and men will take a lot more fish than will be born. result: no more fish in the sea for either whales or men. How to cope with this problem? How to get the Natives on the North West Coast of the American continent to stop from doing what they have done for 1000s of years? Do anyone have a legal or even a moral right to try to prohibit them from hunting whales? I won't put myself into that position. I hope others here on the forum will agree with me.

Grand Elf Mayhem
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. It's all about the balance
Unfortunately, this country is about excess in all things.

I'm betting you get flamed for your sense of balance, just before the flamer goes out for a hamburger... without thought to the pretty brown eyes of a cow... or all the forests that are destroyed for cow pastures... or all the extra methane that puts in our atmosphere... and the lack of greenery, now cut down for the pastures, to balance the methane.

I'd be interested to hear more about Norwegian whaling, from a balanced perspective. Interestingly enough, this is a subject I've been discussing at great length recently with some ecologically minded Norwegians.

Welcome to DU, Far_Rider.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarimer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. Killing whales is NOT environmentally sound
Most species live a long time, are slow to mature and reproduce (20 years or more in some species); it is extremely easy to overfish them. Overturning the whaling ban would be ecological diaster because the Japanese at least are notorious for overfishing EVERYTHING. They are detroying ecosystems in other countries just to feed their seafood habit. Whaling is completely unecessary and disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #10
16. Hi Far_Rider!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC