Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New Jersey Demands Data on Phone Call Surveillance and Is Sued by U.S.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 10:53 AM
Original message
New Jersey Demands Data on Phone Call Surveillance and Is Sued by U.S.
New Jersey Demands Data on Phone Call Surveillance and Is Sued by U.S.

By DAVID W. CHEN and MATT RICHTEL
Published: June 16, 2006

TRENTON, June 15 — The New Jersey attorney general has issued subpoenas to five telephone companies to determine whether any of them violated the state's consumer protection laws by providing records to the National Security Agency. Experts say it is the first legal move by a state to question the agency's program to compile calling records to track terrorist activities.

On Wednesday, the United States filed a lawsuit to block the subpoenas, setting up a legal showdown pitting the state's authority to protect consumers' rights against the federal government's national security powers.

"People in New Jersey and people everywhere have privacy rights," the state's attorney general, Zulima V. Farber, said on Thursday. "What we were trying to determine was whether the phone companies in New Jersey had violated any law or any contractual obligations with their consumers by supplying information to some government entity, simply by request, and not by any court order or search warrant."

This latest confrontation over the invocation of national security began last month, when Ms. Farber issued the subpoenas to the companies — AT&T, Verizon, Qwest, Sprint Nextel and Cingular Wireless — to determine whether they had turned over the phone records to the federal government without a court order, in possible violation of state laws.

more at:
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/16/nyregion/16subpoena.html?_r=2&oref=slogin&oref=slogin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. When you really think about this, this is perhaps one of the things
that should cause us the greatest concern. The implications of the outcome of this are considerable.

We need a regime change here in America, and quickly!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kber Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
2. effen a New Jersey!
Seriously though, nice to be first in this way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
3. How can someone sue to stop information from being released?
This is a new one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. National security, of course
Now, who are they keeping information from? The feds know all this information; so do the phone companies. The terrorists know all they need to know: Don't use your phone to plot your next bomb strike. So, who's being kept in the dark about what the feds and the phone companies have colluded to do? The taxpayers, basically.

Welcome to George W. Bush's America, Red Staters, where despite the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution, you are no longer secure from government intrusion in your person, property or papers. Feel safer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Thilly me. They draw that damned National Security lie like a fake badge
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. Every Freaking State In The Union
should be doing this...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
7. Kicked and Recommended...
it's about tim someone did something!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
8. kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carolinalady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
9. Hillary calls for privacy bill of rights today-no link heard on CNN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 05:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC