Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wanted: A Real Debate On Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 11:43 AM
Original message
Wanted: A Real Debate On Iraq
Recent developments in Iraq have been good, bad, and muddled, by any objective account. The election of a real, legitimate, internationally recognized government in Iraq is an unambiguously good thing; so too was the death of al Qaeda's evil point man in Iraq, Abu Musab al-Zarquawi. The continuing level of violence in Iraq, and continuing concerns about the sectarian influences on Iraqi security forces, have been bad. What's really muddled is the overall progress of Iraq towards any kind of sustainable democracy, and the precise role U.S. forces can play in hastening the transition and withdrawing from the country without inviting chaos or compromising our own interests.

http://www.dlc.org/ndol_ci.cfm?kaid=131&subid=192&contentid=253910
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. The DLC wants a real "debate" but loads the deck.
"Our view is that the situation in Iraq demands a rejection of both the administration's stay-the-course approach and any fixed withdrawal deadline. We differ from most Republicans who continuously search for ways to vindicate the administration's long series of failures in Iraq, and from some Democrats who want to give up and abandon Iraq to the furies of today's contending sectarian factions. But most of all, we think the Congress and the country deserve a real debate on Iraq, not a spin-oriented reaction to the latest news -- good, bad or muddled -- from Baghdad. And Democrats have the obligation not only to hold the administration accountable for its many failures in Iraq, but also to demand a clear strategy for success."

"demand a clear strategy for success." That's kind of like demanding Custer present a "strategy for success" after the Little Big Horn.


The "debate" is between those who want to get out now and those who want to hang around until thrown out by the Iraqis.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC