Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fighting Coulter using her own methods

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
GaYellowDawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 11:45 AM
Original message
Fighting Coulter using her own methods
If we attacked Coulter using her own methods, I imagine it would sound something like this. Make your own decision as to whether you'd like to have something like this speak for you (personally, I found it very tiring to keep up the same amount of venom that energizes her):

This week, Ann Coulter appeared on the Tonight Show. Is anyone as tired of seeing this horse-faced lunatic as I am? They say that the camera adds 15 pounds. If that's the case, she must disappear when she turns sideways. Why in the world would this broad wear a short cocktail dress? The only thing that stops it from hitting the ground when she stands up? The fake boobs. Her boobs are about as genuine as her fact-checking. Add that to the pasty white face, the hair that comes straight from a bottle, and all those jutting bones, and it's a nasty combination. Sexy? Anyone who finds her sexy must have a touch of necrophilia, because she's a walking skeleton.

It figures conservatives would find her sexy. Death is a turn-on for conservatives. When W starts talking about "killin' the terrists," he gets this gleam in his eyes that makes you think something else is happening below the podium. As much killing as Bush has been responsible for, it's no wonder that W's secret paramour, Victor Ashe, accepted an ambassadorship out of the country. He probably hadn't been able to sit down since 9/11.

But back to Coulter. She's got this habit of attacking the manhood of liberals. Apparently, if you don't get a stiffy from blood on your hands, you don't fit her definition of manhood. No wonder she loves W. The Secret Service wouldn't ever let her fulfill her fantasies - after all, those jutting hipbones could give him a couple of nasty stab wounds.

Enough about her appearance. I don't want to make my readers too sick to continue! Coulter has demonstrated her sheer stupidity in her latest NYT "bestseller" (and how easy it is to be a bestseller when your publisher buys your books and reports them as genuine sales). Setting aside the fiasco with the comments on 9/11, Coulter spends a chapter attacking evolution. She claims the fossil record contradicts evolution.

The only people who agree with her are either ignorant, Bible-thumping, scientific illiterates who couldn't reason their way out of a paper bag, much less discern what a scientific theory is, or people who are smart enough to know better but profit in some fashion from the illiterates (like selling books). Then she says that evolution can't be disproved. It'd be pretty simple, Ann. Find just ONE fossil that contradicts it out of the millions found. Find DNA evidence that contradicts it. Can't do it, can you? Of course, the picture becomes a little more clear when you realize that she consulted William Dembski for her material. For those of you who don't know, Dembski and friends have such a weak case that even a conservative Christian judge laid the hammer on them in Dover, PA. Simple lack of evidence for their position. No wonder Ann got into hate speech for a living. You have to be competent instead of hateful to be a lawyer.

What a loser. Hard to believe she sells many more books than her publisher buys. It's heartbreaking to think that there are trees that are no longer alive because her crap has to be printed on paper. Someone ought to take action to save these trees and take her out. Since she's not too much more than a Nazi in leather, perhaps someone could slip a cyanide capsule into her stash of diet pills. Of course, at this point, it wouldn't take a very big dose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. She probably wears a short cocktail dress to mow her lawn
That's all she ever wears. Night, day, in between - she apparently has no other clothes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. In all fairness,
if you had knobby knees, wouldn't you want to show them off?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
3. I love it! Maybe scratch the last 2 sentences from the 2nd paragraph and
at the end, after "it wouldn't take a very big dose" write in caps "JUST KIDDING!" For plausible deniability. (Didn't it work for Coulter?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
4. Has she ever mentioned her dear friend Barbara Olson?
if so she needs to stop going on national TV and whining about not being able to go on national TV and whine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrModerate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
5. This one's pretty good, and -- If I must be honest . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GaYellowDawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Actually, it's a LOT funnier!
I was trying to ape Coulter's style in going after her. And let's face it - Ann Coulter's not funny, so it looks like I've accomplished what I set out to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
6. If you really want to fight her, ignore her
I know, I know. It sounds like backing down, running away. But it's not at all.

Ignoring her pisses her off to no end. Score one!
Ignoring her causes her to be even more over the top than the last time in order to get a little publicity (translation moola to continue doing it) Score two!
Ignoring her causes her editors, publishers, and publicist money which they in turn will not stand for. She'll be toast! Score three!
Ignoring her enrages her, marginalizes her to the edge of the cliff, and casts her into oblivious. HOME RUN!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. One slight correction
She's number one at Amazon, but her book isn't even on the NYTimes bestseller lists, if posters here are to be believed. And the Times marks those titles that are selling due to bulk sales.

Otherwise, quite telling. Not quite like Coulter, though, because I believe you used actual facts that could be proven, and I bet the words were your own, not cut and pasted from another's work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
8. isn't she doing the exact same thing she is accusing the 9-11
widows of? She's making money off their husbands death!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
9. Are you related to the Rude Pundit?
That sounds similar to his description of her. He is a "little" more graphic in his description of her though!

Well said!!

:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
10. Some more of Coulter's methods copied herein...
"It's a shame that the terrorists didn't target her Condo while she was busy at home, polishing her adam's apple."

"We should target Ann and all of Ann's fellow pundits, whom all seem to share one defective brain. We can offer them the option of either converting to Liberalism, or taking a long walk off a short pier. In other words: death by drowning.

In addition, should they chose life, they will be required to submit to a minimum of three years of intensive therapy."

Well, That was a filthy and dismaying exercise. How the fuck do the Annies of America do it day in and day out? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Oh I forgot...
it's "satire". A big, sophisticated, Right-Wing-Manhattanite's joke!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
13. Mel Brooks on Hitler:
Veteran entertainer Mel Brooks created his hit musical The Producers to take a swipe at Nazi dictator Adolf Hitler.

Brooks who saw first-hand the devastation caused by the Fuhrer’s well oiled fighting machinery in Europe during WWII, and spent the subsequent year de-mining places in Germany and Belgium, said that the only way to get back at the Nazi leader was to make him a subject of ridicule.

"Hitler was part of this incredible idea that you could put Jews in concentration camps and kill them. "How do you get even? How do you get even with the man? "There's only one way to get even - you have to bring him down with ridicule, because if you stand on a soapbox and you match him with rhetoric, you're just as bad as he is,” Contactmusic quoted Brooks as saying.

"But if you can make people laugh at him, you're one up on him. One of my lifelong jobs has been to make the world laugh at Adolf Hitler," he added.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. I absolutely love that story from Brooks.
Thanks for putting it up here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carolinalady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
15. Why give her the courtesy of a fight? Her books are selling
on-line for 20 cents apiece. The best way to spay the bitch is to continue to encourage her irrelevancy. Anytime someone takes her stupid ideas on, it just fans the flame for talk show hosts. Let her argue with herself and go to the poor house with the ahmem....income she is making off this new worst seller.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC