Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Lancet: Iraqi Civilian Deaths: 300,000 estimated

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 12:53 PM
Original message
The Lancet: Iraqi Civilian Deaths: 300,000 estimated
http://www.hinduonnet.com/fline/stories/20060616000605900.htm

ON December 12, 2005, President George W. Bush visited Philadelphia. At a gala event, a reporter had the nerve to ask: "Since the inception of the Iraqi war, I'd like to know the approximate total of Iraqis who have been killed. And by Iraqis I include civilians, military, police, insurgents, translators." Bush replied, "How many Iraqi citizens have died in this war? I would say 30,000, more or less, have died as a result of the initial incursion and the ongoing violence against Iraqis." The journalist thanked him, and Bush continued, "I'll repeat the question. If I don't like it, I'll make it up." The guests and journalists laughed and burst into applause.

<snip>

In late 2004, the British medical journal The Lancet reported that "by conservative assumptions, we think about 100,000 excess deaths or more have happened since the 2003 invasion of Iraq... . Most individuals reportedly killed by coalition forces were women and children." While the resistance also targeted innocent civilians, The Lancet argued, "eighty-four per cent of the deaths were reported to be caused by the actions of Coalition forces." On February 8, 2006, Les Roberts (the lead author of the The Lancet's report) said that the number of Iraqi civilian deaths had now risen to 300,000. According to the Baghdad-based journalist Dahr Jamail, "the Baghdad central morgue alone accounts for roughly 30,000 bodies annually." In mid-July, Dr. Liqa Makki, a former Baghdad University journalism professor, reported, "The director of the Forensic Medicine Department said publicly some months ago that his department was receiving 70 bodies a day. But he was reprimanded and a statement was published in the Iraqi press prohibiting the announcement of any kind of body count."

If Iraqi human rights organisations continue to bother the forensic workers at the morgues, the U.S. press followed the Iraqi prohibition to the letter. Rarely does the U.S. press report on Iraqi casualties, which is what made the question to Bush so remarkable. His joke reveals his callousness and the media silence tells us a little of the press release culture of contemporary journalism. Too many reporters have become stenographers of powerful institutions, unwilling to take on establishment wisdom.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think it's important
that people have a realistic figure in mind.

This is what I would expect from what we hear about what is going on - that it would be at least this bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. KICK KICK KICK KICK
THIS IS WHAT SHOULD BE TALKED ABOUT IN CONGRESS AND ON THE TV BOX


KICK THIS IS IMPORTANT OVER A 1/4 OF A MILLION PEOPLE KILLED IN THE NAME OF THEIR FREEDOM

WTF!!!

SORRY ABOUT THE CAPS BUT THIS IS IMPORTANT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. I believe it.
And I'd guess we'd see at least a million dead Iraqis before the whole thing's through.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. Dem leaders here is your silver bullet
here is your issue

do I have to spell it out in the sand


Pro life my ass
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greenman3610 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. no
most people are simply racist and these
numbers don't mean anything to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leeroysphitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. 300,000 DEAD and for what?
Edited on Fri Jun-16-06 01:09 PM by leeroysphits
This is WHY you don't get into a god damned WAR unless you have ABSOLUTELY no other choice. This is what we've been trying to convey to the brain dead flag waiving yahoos for the past 4 god damned years.

If you voted for Bush this blood is on YOUR hands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Iraq is in much worse shape today than when we invaded.
They had already suffered through 10 years of sanctions, followed by this terrible war.

America, are you really this dumb, mean and greedy? Please tell me in November that you aren't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. Because Saddam was a butcher who killed....um...300,000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
8. KICK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
9. If this casualty figure is any near close to being correct,
that puts Bush up in the league with Hitler, Stalin and Mao Se Tung for being the most homicidal leaders of all time.

We have lost 300,000+ Iraqis, 2500 Americans, 10,000 Americans wounded, a trillion dollars and Iraq is in worse shape today than before the attack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
11. They don't care
They don't care about Americans, and they certainly don't care about Iraqis.....:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
12. They don't give a damn about the Iraqis...
Edited on Fri Jun-16-06 04:01 PM by butterfly77
If you listen to any of their talking points yesterday they care about how they will look to the so called terrorists (which really are the Iraqis) and the world. Doesn't the world have tv and haven't the world lost people over there and don't the Iraqis know that their family, friends and neighbors are being killed?

They say collateral damage but if this were happening here this would be another story. At this rate, will there be anyone left to govern? How can this be better than Saddam,. This is the republicons slogan " we killed them to save them " Isn't dead still dead. I am going to ask this question again. What does get the job done mean? Does anyone really believe this is a war? I remember when one of the campaigns for president the repugs said that kerry,clinton and democrats wanted a police action where troops would be patrolling what is the difference? Bush also said that he didn't believe in nation building (bull!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
14. more sadness
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
15. Heh heh heh.
GIGGLING MASS
MURDERER
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
16. 300,000
Fugging hell -this is genocide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
17. Please listen Congress. Please listen people. Please listen.
Real Shock & Awe: After 15 Years War, Sanctions 1,000,000 Iraqis Dead

In 15 Years (1991-2006), the US has caused/contributed to 1,000,000 Iraqi deaths

Persian Gulf War: 150,000
Gulf War Aftermath: Many thousands
UN Sanctions: Primary cause of 600,000 deaths
Iraq War: 250,000

The Persian Gulf War did not have to happen: Hussein did not invade Kuwait until after he had received an assurance from April Gillespie that the "US had no opinion on Arab-Arab conflicts." Even if he had invaded, alternatives to war were available.

The Gulf War Aftermath Encouraged by American radio broadcasts to rise up against their ‘dictator’, the Kurds of northern Iraq rebelled against a nominally defeated and certainly weakened Saddam Hussein in March of 1991. Fear of being drawn into an Iraqi civil war and possible diplomatic repercussions precluded President Bush from committing US forces to support the Kurds. Within days Iraqi forces recovered and launched a ruthless counteroffensive including napalm and chemical attacks from helicopters. They quickly reclaimed lost territory and crushed the rebellion. By the first week of April, 800 to 1,000 people, mostly the very young and the very old, were dying each day. link Al Franken has said that many 100,000's of Kurds and Shia were slaughtered, but I do not have a printed source.

UN (US/UK Sanctions) The United Nations Security Council has maintained comprehensive economic sanctions on Iraq from August 1990 until March 2003. Sanctions in Iraq hurt large numbers of innocent civilians not only by limiting the availability of food and medicines, but also by disrupting the whole economy, and reducing the national capacity of water treatment, electrical systems and other infrastructure critical for health and life. The oil-for-food program provided an average of $200 per year for each of 23,000,000 Iraqis - well below the international poverty level. In the UN Security Council, countries urged the US and UK to allow the sanctions to be lifted, but the US/UK would not allow this.

Iraq War A Johns Hopkins University study published in the British medical journal The Lancet in October, 2004. // The figure of 100,000 had been based on somewhat "conservative assumptions", notes Les Roberts at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, U.S., who led the study. That estimate excludes Falluja, a hotspot for violence. If the data from this town is included, the compiled studies point to about 250,000 excess deaths since the outbreak of the U.S.-led war. // Eman Ahmad Khamas.... said: "This occupation has destroyed Iraq. Americans don't know that tens of thousands of Iraqis are in prisons. Americans don't know how many have been killed. Lancet reported 100,000 in 2004, not counting Falluja. Now it is something like double this number."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-17-06 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. CONGRESS . . . DOESN'T . . . . CARE . . . !!!!!! . . .
and neither do a large hunk of the American population . . . unless you're talking about AMERICANS, casualty figures are just numbers . . .

for some (e.g. Tony Snow), even if they're Americans it's just numbers . . .

this country has lost its soul . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-17-06 06:59 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. What you believe is/becomes reality. Hence,
I DO believe that the people care, they just don't know it yet.

And I should've never posted "Please..." I should've posted "Listen!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-16-06 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
18. I say the media has played along in dehumanizing Iraqis. "Not humans"
I think it's an old fascist trick...
Point out an 'outgroup' and whip up hate. Dehumanize the enemy/outgroup, and kill kill kill your way to power and wealth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-17-06 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
20. I remember back in 12/04 it was estimated at 100,000.
This was published in the Guardian, and I posted that article last week on DU when someone was using the 40,000 figure from the IBC. I also reminded the OP about Tommy Franks saying "We don't do body counts".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never_get_over_it Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-17-06 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. Think the 2004 report came out just before the election
because when I found out my nephew voted for the freak in OH - I left him a SCREAMING and I MEAN SCREAMING message how could he have possibly voted for a man who was responsible for the death of a 100,000 people - oh my GOD was I pissed at that kid.

I had tried VERY HARD before the election to convince him that he couldn't possibly vote for someone who had caused such destruction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-17-06 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #21
24. I stand corrected! You're right! It came out at the end of 10/2004 here's
the article

http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,1338749,00.html
100,000 Iraqi civilians dead, says study

Sarah Boseley, health editor
Friday October 29, 2004
The Guardian

About 100,000 Iraqi civilians - half of them women and children - have died in Iraq since the invasion, mostly as a result of airstrikes by coalition forces, according to the first reliable study of the death toll from Iraqi and US public health experts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-17-06 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
23.  I wonder what the USA is doing with all those dead Iraqi people?
I sure hope we aren't throwing their bodies into mass graves.

Come to think of it Bush never mentions Saddam's mass graves any more.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 05:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC