Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Homeland Security money going to hotly contested Repug controlled cities.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
happydreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-17-06 02:56 PM
Original message
Homeland Security money going to hotly contested Repug controlled cities.
Edited on Sat Jun-17-06 03:15 PM by happydreams
....Predictably, local officials and congressional representatives from both the New York and D.C. areas are furious; New York's funding got cut by a staggering 40 percent. And the overall funding for 2005 was cut by $125 million, from $865 million to $740 million. I guess ol' George really doesn't think about me that much anymore......

You see, I can't help but notice that cities located in states where Republicans are struggling to hang on to power in the 2006 election did really, really well in the Department of Homeland Security's grant- allocation process—Louisville, Omaha, Milwaukee, Charlotte, Tampa, and St. Louis all got nice, hefty increases. (Louisville got $8.5 million? So did Milwaukee?) Tampa—Tampa?—got $8.8 million, and four other cities in Florida got even more. The exception was Ohio, where not one city got even $5 million. But the Republicans have Ohio pretty well sewn up....

more

http://www.seattleweekly.com/news/0624/geov-parrish.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-17-06 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. They gave up on New Mexico, I guess
because we've gone to 100% paper, optical scan ballots. Our budget was cut 30%, not that it was huge to begin with. Los Alamos isn't worth protecting, I guess.

Stupid was in town yesterday to stump for Heartless Heather Wilson, a pol so totally out of touch with her "home" state that she hasn't realized Stupid is her albatross. The headline this morning screamed that the visit raised a whopping $75,000. That means 15 people paid $5,000 a whack to have their pictures taken with the boy king. I'm surprised they admitted the take was so low.

I doubt he'll come here again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happydreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-17-06 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. Marvin Bush (boyking's brother)pulls alot of weight at Homeland Security
Edited on Sat Jun-17-06 04:07 PM by happydreams
It looks like the Bushies profit personally as well as politically. The aftermath of 9/11 sure has been good them.


Marvin P. Bush, one of George W. Bush's three younger brothers, is co-founder and partner in Winston Partners, a private investment firm in Alexandria, Va. Winston Partners in turn is part of a larger venture capital entity called the Chatterjee Group, headed by venture capitalist Purnendu Chatterjee. (Venture capital firms provide money to start-up businesses and other companies, usually in return for equity and some managerial say in the company.)

Through this and other business relationships, this Bush sibling is positioned to do very well in high-tech activities as a result of provisions of the Patriot Act.

.....H.R. 3162, called "The Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act" (or USA Patriot), was designed to prevent money laundering and requires banks to "know their customers."

Inevitably, many companies are aggressively marketing services to make businesses "Patriot Act"-compliant: that is, they sell computer systems to enable banks to argue successfully to Uncle Sam that they're not laundering money for terrorists. One of the most aggressive is Sybase Inc., which developed a "Sybase PATRIOT compliance Solution" months ago. Sybase, which said it wanted foreign banks as customers (it already had a deal with the People's Bank of China), landed Sumitomo Mitsui Bank in time for the October 2002 compliance deadline.....


much more

http://www.counterpunch.org/burns1205.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nosillies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-17-06 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. I had been wondering about this
Edited on Sat Jun-17-06 05:36 PM by amybhole
but haven't had the time to do the research. Thanks for the info.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 06:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC