Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Perfect Stonewall by David Corn

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
im10ashus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-21-06 11:08 AM
Original message
The Perfect Stonewall by David Corn
Future presidents and press secretaries will owe much to George W. Bush and Scott McClellan—that is, if they ever want to mount a cover-up. A week after Karl Rove's lawyer announced he was no longer under investigation by special counsel Patrick Fitzgerald in the CIA leak case, it's rather clear that Rove and the White House pulled perfected the art of stonewalling. They—and this caper—will be an inspiration to spinners everywhere.

In July 2003, when columnist Bob Novak (first) and Time magazine (second) published stories disclosing that Valerie Wilson was a CIA officer—and cited administration officials as their sources—the White House responded with a simple denial. McClellan, who had just inherited the White House secretary press position from Ari Fleischer, said of this leak, "That is not the way this president or this White House operates." There was no wiggle room in that statement.

Months later, once the news broke that the Justice Department—acting in response to a CIA request—would be investigating the leak, the White House got more specific. Scott McClellan stated that any White House aide who leaked information on Valerie Wilson would be dismissed, and he asserted that neither Karl Rove nor Scooter Libby had been involved in the leak. Months after that, Bush reaffirmed that the leaker—if discovered—would be booted from his White House.

This was all unambiguous. It ain't us. It ain't Rove. It ain't Libby. And if we knew who had done this, he'd be run out of town. This straight talk got the White House all the way through the 2004 elections.

cont'd...

http://www.tompaine.com/articles/2006/06/21/the_perfect_stonewall.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RufusEarl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-21-06 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. Libby pardon!
I heard someone on Tee Wee saying that Libby will be pardoned and it will happen soon, i expect that this is correct information.

This is pure power, this is pure power! IMHO, Rove was never in trouble with fitz. At anytime Bu$h could and would pull the plug on Fitz, the end result of Rove walking was a given to me. Because it is pure power, it's evil power but power just the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
im10ashus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-21-06 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I wouldn't doubt Libby is pardoned soon.
Their gall has no limits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusEarl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-21-06 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. According to the Tee Wee guy
Libby has to much information to ever let him get on a witness stand, and the possibility of Cheney taking the stand is out of the question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidwparker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-21-06 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Sure. That then eliminates the probably of Rove committing pergury
on the stand.

That would be a good opportunity for Joe Wilson and his wife to sue for damages -- lost wages -- in a civil court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
im10ashus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-21-06 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I so hope Wilson sues them all.
And wins. Even that would be a vindication of sorts. Although I think they should all be hung by their toenails.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-21-06 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
6. Not "mis-speaks", not "out of context" not "misunderstood"
LIES. Frequent, often, repeatedly. DSM, Plame, wiretaps and court-orders, new Treasury secretaries. Provable, irrefutable LIES. Who is the reporter or talking head who will just call it like it is - as we all know it to be? Why does the media aid and abet? Why does anyone believe anything that this administration says? Why should they? Do they deserve even one ounce of credibility? No, they do not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
im10ashus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-21-06 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. "Who is the reporter or talking head who will just call it like it is"
David Corn. That's who. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-21-06 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. umm - good point! Seeing as he wrote a book with that title and all.
I guess I mean someone more immediately accessible to average Americans. They (we) really do understand the concept of "lie". Which is why many were so outraged at Clinton - he violated their trust because they did not believe that one could lie so openly and brazenly. Well - Bush has lied even more openly and more brazenly and about things that actually affect ALL of us - not just consensual adult sex.

Why are all the talking heads so delicate. Why don't they just come out and use that word LIAR. Republicans were never shy about using it with Clinton. It's not even sliming if it's TRUE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
im10ashus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-21-06 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. I think a lot of it has to do with the corporatization (sp) of our media.
GE, which is a huge war profiteer, owns NBC, can we expect fair and balanced coverage? I don't think so. It's a conflict of interest. It's sad that we have allowed these criminals to get away with so much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC