Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"The Single Most Important [Media] Policy Debate"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
im10ashus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-21-06 03:11 PM
Original message
"The Single Most Important [Media] Policy Debate"
"This innocuous-looking document initiates the single most important public policy debate that the FCC will tackle this year," Federal Communications Commissioner Michael Copps explained Wednesday, as the commission issued the "Notice of Proposed Rulemaking" that initiates the next big fight over media ownership rules in the United States.

"Don't let its slimness fool you," added Copps. "It means that this Commission has begun to decide on behalf of the American people the future of our media. It means deciding whether or not to accelerate media concentration, step up the loss of local news and change forever the critical role independent newspapers perform for our country."

The commission's decision to issue the notice marks the beginning of an epic battle in the long struggle over whether to loosen ownership rules in a manner that would allow individual media companies to effectively take control of mass communications in cities across the country. But the precise nature of the fight was left unclear by FCC chairman Kevin Martin, who is guiding the rulemaking process.

Martin, a Bush administration appointee who is closely tied to a White House that wants to rewrite media ownership rules in a manner that will allow for a dramatic new wave of consolidation of ownership at the local level, is expected to use the process that began Wednesday to try and advance the agenda of the media conglomerates that in 2003 sought unsuccessfully to eliminate long-standing barriers to media monopoly. In a strategic shift, Martin is not proposing specifics rule changes at the start of the process. Rather, he is inviting comment on the broad issue of media ownership with the goal of then proposing and implementing specific rule changes after the public comment period is finished.

cont'd...

http://www.thenation.com/blogs/thebeat?bid=1&pid=94578
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-21-06 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. The FCC must be held more accountable to the will of the people
As it stands, the office of president holds more sway over it than do people. There's got to be structural reforms, in my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
im10ashus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-21-06 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. They have been hijacked by Bushco.
It's part of their control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-21-06 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. No- actually Clinton was a HUGE part of this
Edited on Wed Jun-21-06 04:04 PM by depakid
Through his utter and complete failure to regulate via the FCC. He's the one responsible for the destruction of radio through the Telecomminications Act. He also appointed Republican "free" market libertarian Micheal Powell to the commission.

The irony is that the corporate media never gave the guy a break from day one- and still, he (and other sell out Dems) consistently pandered to them.

And- they're still at it- they gave this far current right commissioner a total pass, releasing a hold- not even attempting to slow this down (or air the issues out) through a formal hearing and a vote.

"The U.S. Senate on Friday (May 26) unanimously confirmed COMPTEL lawyer Robert McDowell as the fifth member of the FCC.

McDowell’s nomination had been on hold for some time; his confirmation gives FCC Chairman Kevin J. Martin a Republican majority, which he has not had since he was appointed chairman in early 2005.

http://www.newtelephony.com/news/65h261231387026.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC