Kerry-Feingold Amendment Up Next - Cspan-2

wrangling now over procedure . . . Sen. Kerry on now . . .

Warner bitching now

To see the Chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee bitching about the little details when his fellow Senators are trying to end a war :(

Did Levin come up for a vote yet?

didn't hear those objections during the flag debate or the gay marriage debate

that's his baby

That's what that was all about and that's why this amendment wasn't scheduled until 5 pm today.

Warner trying to obstruct him

What's up with spending all of this time arguing about time?

the Levin presentation lulled me to sleep.

.

anyone else?

"You don't do it (go to war) by repeatedly misleading the American people."

:thumbsup:

:cry:

with contempt

amendment is on the floor

:toast:

says it all

Guess what, Warner, we got nothing but contempt for you

back at him

Apparently Holy Joe will later treat us with a speech, oh goodie :eyes:

and Iraq was not on the list in November 2001.... :shrug:

He is building the case that the Iraq War was unnecessary and that he is very proud of voting against it. He is making the lucid point that the war on Terror had nothing to do with Iraq and that the arguments that we need to stay in Iraq because of the threat of terrorism is false. Nice argument and he is presenting if well.

.

increased terror

"...so we don't have to have that moment of silence for # 10,000." God, that is a horrible thought, but entirely possible if the insanity continues. :cry: :scared:

and that is why I like him so much....

He has reminded his listeners that this was a false war that was aimed at a group and a threat that didn't exist. America is wrong to keep pursuing this course because it does detract from the actual threat of terrorism.

Sen. Feingold is also attacking the idiotic idea that we have to stay in Iraq because our troops died there. War cannot justify more war.

What if we could save lives in Iraq by leaving?

absolutely right....

us to fuel their hatred....

:applause:

Sometimes I think we know him too well.

who should speak and for how long. WHY do they appear so damned confused at the moment? Because Dems have the floor? They obviously don't even care to listen to this.

The Admin proposed a war against the wrong target.

Iraqis must take over the security of their own country.

The US cannot win this war. This is up to the Iraqis.

Militarily.

.

ugh break

why doesn't he just change parties already?

The passion in the opening debate should make it a recognized, defendable alternative.

Date certain is commitment to leave. Anything else as Sen. Feingold said, is an open-ended commitment.

:hi: :loveya: :hug: :pals: :grr: :puck:

Bastard!

this dh out of office......

Lieberman's going to have to eat every one of his words.

support these amendments? Why does he have to make a speech on it???

Lieberman thinks people will vote for him because he is a great man of principle even though they totally disagree with him. There is no other explanation for it.

It's the only reason that I can think of

You're happy to send other people's sons & daughters, husbands & wives to die for a pack of lies and your war profiteer buddies




STFU Joe :grr:

:hi: :loveya: :hug: :pals: :grr:

:hi: :loveya: :hug: :pals: :grr:

Ned Lamont statement on the Levin/Reed Amendment

Currently, our troops are stuck in a bloody civil war in Iraq, with no exit strategy. The violence continues unabated and the continued presence of our forces with no sign of a reduction fuels the insurgency and further destabilizes the region. President Bush and his allies believe American troops should stay in Iraq indefinitely – he said that it would be an issue for “future Presidents and future governments of Iraq.”

“I support the Levin-Reed Amendment on U.S. Policy in Iraq, and I urge Senator Lieberman to do the same.

“It represents the minimum needed, but will build a Democratic coalition to establish and stick to a plan to end the war.

“The three main provisions of the Amendment – expediting the
transition of U.S. forces to a limited mission, a phased redeployment of U.S. forces, and requiring the administration to submit to Congress its plan for continued redeployment beyond 2006 – are all critical to
ensuring that the we move forward from our current failed strategy.

“This is an issue that needs to be dealt with by the current President
and the current government of Iraq. ‘Stay the course’ is not a
strategy for any real victory, and it is time that the President and Congress recognize that fact and take the steps needed to ensure true safety and security for the region and for America

http://www.nedlamont.com

REPEATEDLY you stupid mofo

:puke:

:puke: :puke:

:puke::puke::puke:


could this guy be any more full of himself?

He said, "we need to stay until the Iraqis can stand for themselves... and they have shown they are standing for themselves... so we need to stay because they have shown they are doing it"

:crazy:

but who gives a rat's ass what the Iraqi's want, apparently not them....

THEY HAVE ASKED US TO!!!

He's defending Bush and said the Iraq War is now a necessity! Faints... :crazy:

Please Ct, bring in Ned Lamont!

"Joementum has lost his tiny mind!"

there's nothing redeemable left.

:rofl:

Warner is licking LIEberman's boots for his performance

is dragging.

it would be much appreciated. I've got to chill.

mation?

:hi:

:hug: