Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anthrax letters. What happened to that story?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Jara sang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-22-06 03:34 PM
Original message
Anthrax letters. What happened to that story?
You never hear about it. When the media does mention it's always as a footnote to a September 11th story.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-22-06 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Because the MSM would have to admit we were attacked again after 9-11.
I bet most 'Murikans have forgotten about the anthrax attacks and murders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-22-06 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. INSIDE JOB
Everybody who has followed that one knows it. The strain of anthrax was not only traced back to the gummint, it was traced back to a specific lab, the high level containment bioweapons lab at Ft. Detrick. The FBI has shut that lab down twice, going over it, but has been completely stonewalled by the CIA bioweapons group that runs it.

There is no way weaponized anthrax can be handled safely outside a high level containment facility. Once it's exposed to air, it will quickly volatize throughout the area, causing massive environmental contamination and illnesses. We didn't see that, did we? The targets were all very specific: a photographer who embarrassed the Bush twins, Democratic Congressmen, and Tom Brokaw.

They were quick to howl that it HAD to have been an Iraqi plot, that Hussein had been given anthrax by Poppy in the 80s. Unfortunately, the strain was different and Iraq's attempts to weaponize the stuff using bentonite to decrease the unwanted qualities of the exterior coating on the bacteria had gone nowhere.

The right was very nearly able to shut Congress down. They did shut down the House, but the Senate had already gotten a bare
Democratic majority thanks to Jeffords, and they were unable to do the job completely. The Democrats wouldn't cave.

There you have it: a weaponized agent that was traced to a containment lab and couldn't have been handled outside it, targets who were chosen because of their threat to the Bush family empire, and the first executive branch coup attempt.

Inside job. Oh, yeah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-22-06 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. Cheney probably quashed the investigation...
After he destroyed all the extra viles of anthrax laying around his office. :tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-22-06 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. When people ask themselves what happened to
the Democratic Party, one answer is found on the envelopes of those letters.

George Monbiot, more than four years ago:

In December, the Washington Post reported that genetic tests showed that the variety used by the terrorist was a sub-strain cultivated by scientists at the US army's medical research institute for infectious diseases (USAMRIID) at Fort Detrick, Maryland. That finding was publicly confirmed two weeks ago, when the test results were published in the journal Science. New Scientist magazine notes that the anthrax the terrorist used appears to have emerged from Fort Detrick only recently, as the researchers found that samples which have been separated from each other for three years acquire "substantial genetic differences".

...

Last week, I phoned the FBI. Why, I asked, when the evidence was so abundant, did the trail appear to have gone cold? "The investigation is continuing," the spokesman replied. "Has it gone cold because it has led you to a government office?" I asked. He put down the phone.

Had he stayed on the line, I would have asked him about a few other offenses the FBI might wish to consider. The army's development of weaponized anthrax, for example, directly contravenes both the biological weapons convention and domestic law. So does its plan to test live microbes in "aerosol chambers" at the Edgewood Chemical Biological Center, also in Maryland. So does its development of a genetically modified fungus for attacking coca crops in Colombia, and GM bacteria for destroying materials belonging to enemy forces. These, as the research group Project Sunshine has discovered, appear to be just a tiny sample of the illegal offensive biological research programs which the US government has secretly funded. Several prominent scientists have suggested that the FBI's investigation is being pursued with less than the rigor we might have expected because the federal authorities have something to hide.

The FBI has dismissed them as conspiracy theorists. But there is surely a point after which incompetence becomes an insufficient explanation for failure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zeemike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-22-06 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. It went down the memory hole
Never to be seen again. And so what, it was only liberals that suffered from it, plus a few postal workers, and they are cheep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-22-06 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
6. The FBI was told to 'stand down' on that crime.
Just like NORAD was told to 'stand down' while 911 was happening. Massive crimes that will never be solved due to 'conflict of interest' issues in the Executive Branch. That it was the Dem leadership makes it obvious as to why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThoughtCriminal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-22-06 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
7. Every Target was considered an Enemy by RW's
Motive
Motive
Motive

I don't know if it was an "official" assasination or just a freeper janitor at the lab, but the FBI looked everywhere except the obvious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Check12 Donating Member (445 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-22-06 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
8. I hate it that when wingnuts say we have not been attacked
since 911 and they go unchallenged! First is it a lie, we were attacked after 911
It's never been proved that those attacks were related to 911, they remain unsolved just like Osama is still at large, and by stating this publiclly it brings those very weird events back into focus.

Dems need to have rapid response on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-22-06 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
9. And why was the WH taking Cipro 2 weeks before the 1st attack?
Someone have a cystal ball at the WH? Cipro is an antidote not a preventitive drug to avoid infection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-22-06 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. How long have we been asking that question here on DU?
Years? It was even reported they were taking Cipro before the Anthrax attacks...guess the FBI can't investigate their boss. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-22-06 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
11. why aren't leahy and daschle talking about it?! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 01:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC