Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reuters now reporting Iraqi PM to present reconciliation plan to Assembly

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-24-06 07:46 AM
Original message
Reuters now reporting Iraqi PM to present reconciliation plan to Assembly
Edited on Sat Jun-24-06 07:48 AM by flpoljunkie
Iraq PM to Present Reconciliation Plan to Assembly

By REUTERS
Published: June 24, 2006

Filed at 8:07 a.m. ET

BAGHDAD (Reuters) - Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki was expected to present a national reconciliation plan to parliament on Sunday aimed at defusing the Sunni insurgency and tackling sectarian violence, political sources said.

The plan, which could be Maliki's boldest political move yet, sets out to remove powerful militias from the streets, open a dialogue with rebels and review the status of purged members of Saddam Hussein's Baath party.

Political sources said a key element of the 28-point blueprint would be to draw rebel groups into the process of implementing hoped-for agreements on such questions as defining ''terrorism.''

One important question will be how far Maliki, a Shi'ite Islamist who took office on May 20, would be willing to go to bring Sunni Muslim insurgents to the negotiating table.

more...

http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/world/international-iraq.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-24-06 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. I've never been to that part of the world, but "removing militias" from
the streets doesn't sound to me like a weekend project.

To be frank, it doesn't sound like a project with a high likelihood of success either.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-24-06 08:01 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Withdrawal timetable also now discussed as issue "likely to be raised."
Edited on Sat Jun-24-06 08:03 AM by flpoljunkie
Insurgent groups have always demanded a U.S. troop withdrawal or a timetable, so that issue is likely to be raised.

President Bush has refused to give a timetable, despite an unpopular war which has killed more than 2,500 U.S. troops. At least 13 died in combat this week.

http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/world/international-iraq.html

Not quite the information we were getting from the London Times article yesterday...

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,7374-2239088,00.html

The draft marks the first time the Iraqi Government has endorsed a fixed timeline for the withdrawal of coalition forces from Iraq, a key demand of the Sunni insurgency.

“We must agree on a timed schedule to pull out the troops from Iraq
, while at the same time building up the Iraqi forces that will guarantee Iraqi security and this must be supported by a United Nations Security Council decision,” the document reads.

One insurgent group involved in the discussions told The Times that the timetable for withdrawing foreign troops was key. “We are not against the formation of the new Iraqi goverment, but with certain conditions, which are to put a timetable for the pullout of US Troops," Abu Fatma, from the Islamic National Front for Liberation of Iraq, said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-24-06 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Our foreign policy may be a real obstacle for the Iraqi government's
own perceptions of how it wants things to unfold.

If it's been a bloody mess so far, it might yet get worse.

Good thing we have a Russian expert as Secretary of State, huh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-24-06 08:26 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Why is this story being ignored by the M$M, other than on the wires?
Edited on Sat Jun-24-06 08:29 AM by flpoljunkie
And will it be mentioned at all on the Sunday News shows?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-24-06 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Very good question, flpoljunkie. I don't always have the tv on so
Edited on Sat Jun-24-06 08:31 AM by Old Crusoe
a lot of what I get comes from the web or radio.

Even when MSM covers a story they hand it to someone like Paula Zahn, which is almost like dropping it down a trash chute.

The stories often have longer, stronger legs on the blogs than they do on a tv news cycle.

Bush leaves Baghdad after another showing photo-op, the Senate rejects two Democrat resolutions to withdraw troops, and the head of the new Iraqi government begins talk of timetables.

Thank GOD we arrested those homeless guys in Miami in that warehouse. I feel safer already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-24-06 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
4. So, the ones that tortured and beheaded 2 soldiers recently get amnesty
and 19 GOP Senators are loving it!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-24-06 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Times article writes more about the very thorny issue of amnesty in Iraq.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,7374-2239088,00.html

But one big potential obstacle is whether the US would be willing to grant an amnesty to insurgents who have killed US soldiers but who are not members of extreme groups such as al-Qaeda. The Bush Administration is thought to be split on the issue.

“This is very hard for us, particularly at a time when American servicemen are facing prosecution for alleged war crimes — and others are being captured and tortured,” a senior US official said.

With 2,500 US soldiers having died in Iraq, to grant an amnesty would be a “huge political football” before the November mid-term elections in the US,he said. But he added: “This is what we did after the Second World War, after the Civil War, after the War of Independence. It may be unpalatable and unsavoury but it is how wars end.”

The Government intends to form a committee to distinguish between groups that can be considered legitimate resistance and those that are beyond the pale. “For those that defended their country against foreign troops, we need to open a new page . . . They did not mean to destabilise Iraq. They were defending Iraqi soil,” said Adnan Ali, a senior member of the Dawa party of Nouri alMaliki, the Prime Minister.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-24-06 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
8. Aimed at defusing the Sunni insurgency? So I am totally mistaken
in the impression that the Kurds and the Shi'ites have been fighting the US and each other too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-24-06 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
9. Aljazeera reporting something quite different on this story...
A politician says the Iraqi government will present a 28-point national reconciliation plan to parliament on Sunday that will grant some fighters amnesty and ask for approval of steps for Iraqis to take over security from US soldiers.

Mahmoud Othman, a senior Kurdish politician, said on Friday the plan also would include a timeline for preparing Iraqi forces to take over security from US forces.

That would fit with the overall US-led multinational force's strategy to transfer security to Iraqi forces in certain regions while withdrawing to larger regional bases to stand ready to help in case of emergency.

A final stage would involve the drawdown of US soldiers from those bases.

"There is no finite and UN-approved timeline for the withdrawal of foreign troops, but there is a timeline to accomplish the readiness of Iraqi security forces to take over security in the country," Othman said.

http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/5172A610-5C55-4A84-8F75-59E7FD862B45.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC