Michelle Malkin: New York Times ENDANGERS US ALL!

The New York Times (proudly publishing all the secrets unfit to spill since 9/11) and their reckless anonymous sources (come out, come out, you cowards) tipped off terrorists to America's efforts to track their financial activities.

Guess what? It isn't the first time blabbermouth journalists have jeopardized terror-financing investigations since Sept. 11, according to the government.

I remind you of the case of the Treason Times, the Holy Land Foundation, and the Global Relief Foundation. As the New York Post reported last September, the Justice Department charged that "a veteran New York Times foreign correspondent warned an alleged terror-funding Islamic charity that the
FBI was about to raid its office -- potentially endangering the lives of federal agents." Times reporter Philip Shenon was accused of blowing the cover on a Dec. 14, 2001, raid of the Global Relief Foundation...

"Much more is needed?" Right. And when the Bush administration came through, the Times stabbed them, and us, in the backs. The lesson is clear. When terror strikes, don't believe a word the know-it-all Times prints. They are opportunistic, hindsighted hypocrites who endanger us all.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/uc/20060628/cm_uc_crmmax/michelle_malkin20060628

:puke:

What a sad bag-o-wind she is, maybe if she had a penis her housband would like her more.

She really is an ugly person. I'm not talking about her looks but everything that makes up Michelle Malkin is just plain ugly.

It seems especially sad when women buy into the anti-human policies of the extreme right wing. I feel the same way when I see how the emetic Clarence Thomas has betrayed his race. These people are simply awful. Historians in the future will wonder why the hell we put up with them.

to go to the local Wal Mart ever since the NY Times printed their story.

her upper parts from her rear. Of course, this action didn't endanger us all.

http://www.gregpalast.com/detail.cfm?artid=103
FBI and military intelligence officials in Washington say they were prevented for political reasons from carrying out full investigations into members of the Bin Laden family in the US before the terrorist attacks of September 11.

US intelligence agencies have come under criticism for their wholesale failure to predict the catastrophe at the World Trade Centre. But some are complaining that their hands were tied.

FBI documents shown on BBC Newsnight last night and obtained by the Guardian show that they had earlier sought to investigate two of Osama bin Laden's relatives in Washington and a Muslim organisation, the World Assembly of Muslim Youth (WAMY), with which they were linked.

The FBI file, marked Secret and coded 199, which means a case involving national security, records that Abdullah bin Laden, who lived in Washington, had originally had a file opened on him "because of his relationship with the World Assembly of Muslim Youth - a suspected terrorist organisation".

:scared:

He outlined a plan to track and deal with potential terrorists banking: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/09/print/20010924-4.html


For a few years I've known for a fact that the US gov has been tracking all large financil transactions and anyone who has had any large amounts of money come in would probably know as well if they were paying attention at all. When we had to accept a nice size workmen's comp settlement the bank had to know where the money was from and what was the reason for the large amount of money. When we sold our house last year we had to sign a statement stating basically that we are not terrorists trying to move funds around and it wasn't just us but the person who bought our house as well. According to our lawyer it was required by the government since 9-11.

The fact is that this is OLD and certainly not "secret". NYT's should issue a "correction" about it's being "secret" and expose BushCo and CONs like this Malkin creature for being the LIARS and SPINNERS that they are.

So, "ALL" is the wrong word Michelle. I am in no more danger today than i was before the Times (and her precious Wall Street Journal) printed this information.

Wrong again, Malky. But, then she's probably used to being wrong by now. She is wrong so often.
The Professor

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x2701232

Just in case you missed it.

TC

If the New York TIMES is far from perfect it is nevertheless one of the best newspapers in the world. Every Sunday, for example, I can read a long and brilliant column by Frank Rich that negates anything Michelle Malkin might have to say on any subject.

When Republicans are in deep do-do they attack "the liberal media" generally and the New York TIMES particularly. In times past, George Wallace, when he wished to stall History and stir up the locals against meaningful reform, referred to the press as "the liberal Jew media," by which he meant the New York TIMES.

This Sunday I will continue to ignore every single syllable that comes out of Michelle Malkin's mouth and pick up yet another copy of the TIMES to see what Frank Rich has to say about Guantanamo and other topics.