|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Philosoraptor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-30-06 02:44 PM Original message |
So the Supreme Court has ruled that W Must Adhere to Geneva Convention? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
htuttle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-30-06 02:49 PM Response to Original message |
1. That's the long and short of it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-30-06 02:49 PM Response to Original message |
2. A friend of mine is an attorney, and he feels the ruling from the SCOTUS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Philosoraptor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-30-06 02:51 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. I wonder how many times the U.S. has broken the laws in 4 years? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
htuttle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-30-06 02:51 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. He can still be charged years or even decades later |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
halobeam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-30-06 03:07 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. Isn't that it in a nutshell? They will change the rules, to get him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Philosoraptor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-30-06 03:12 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. I know W will do whatever he damn well pleases. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sable302 (597 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-30-06 03:20 PM Response to Reply #6 |
12. we ratified the Geneva Conventions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hugin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-30-06 03:30 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Nah, it's a "Convention" not a "Treaty"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sable302 (597 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-30-06 03:16 PM Response to Reply #2 |
10. one thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hugin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-30-06 03:18 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. It was served up yesterday... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-30-06 02:55 PM Response to Original message |
5. Not sure what the Supremes did but The Constitution classifies... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hugin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-30-06 03:11 PM Response to Original message |
7. They'll turn around and say The Constitution talks about "treaties" and... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-30-06 03:15 PM Response to Original message |
9. you got it but doesn't the US not recognize the world court? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 07th 2024, 02:13 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC