Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kerry amendment: TSA must comply with federal contracting laws

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-12-06 05:28 PM
Original message
Kerry amendment: TSA must comply with federal contracting laws
Every effort to dismantle the BS structure put in place in the name of Bush's "war on terror" is a step in the right direction.

Kerry Measure Adds Accountability to TSA Contracting

1 hour, 23 minutes ago

To: National and Business Desks, Transportation Reporter

Contact: Kathryn Seck, 202-224-9431, for Sen. Kerry, or Alex Formuzis, 202-224-7340, for Sen. Lautenberg

WASHINGTON, July 12 /U.S. Newswire/ -- Sen.
John Kerry (D- Mass.) secured an amendment to the
Homeland Security Appropriations Bill today that will repeal the Transportation Security Administration's (TSA) exemption from federal contracting laws. The provision, cosponsored by Sens. Olympia J. Snowe (R-Maine) and Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.), adds increased transparency and accountability while also helping to level the playing field for smaller firms who want to compete for contracts.

"America's safety and security has to be the number one priority. TSA has a long record of contract mismanagement, and they should no longer receive special treatment. Our safety and security are in their hands," said Kerry. "Washington shouldn't be fleecing American citizens to protect them. We need to put an end to multi-billion dollar no-bid contracts. My amendment will hold TSA to the same rules as every other federal agency and increase contracting opportunities for small businesses."

"The
Department of Defense isn't exempt from contracting laws, and the TSA shouldn't be, either. The TSA can protect travelers without wasting tax dollars," said Sen. Lautenberg.

Nearly every other federal agency, including the Department of Defense, must abide by the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), which includes the Competition in Contracting Act and the Small Business Act. Because of the urgent need for airport screening equipment in the aftermath of 9/11, the TSA was exempted from these regulations.

Yet over the last five years, TSA's contracting record has been harshly criticized by the agency's inspector general and the General Accountability Office -- giving no justification for a permanent exemption from the FAR.

For instance, in 2003 Boeing received $82 million to cover $39 million in costs -- a 210 percent return -- for its "cost-plus-a- percentage" contract that it awarded in violation of federal law. In 2002, a contract awarded outside the normal process tripled to $3 billion after a computer networking company failed to complete the task and over-billed the government for 117,000 man hours. The TSA also allowed one contract to expand from $104 million to $741 million because they insisted on recruiting airport screeners in lavish hotels like the Waldorf-Astoria.

The Kerry-Snowe-Lautenberg amendment strikes the section of the U.S. Code that currently exempts TSA from the FAR and requires the agency to comply within 180 days.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/usnw/20060712/pl_usnw/kerry_measure_adds_accountability_to_tsa_contracting144_xml




So there are other capable companies!


US Army to end contract with Halliburton: report



Wed Jul 12, 12:02 PM ET

WASHINGTON (AFP) - The US Army reportedly will not renew its contract with Halliburton, the oil service giant formerly run by Vice President
Dick Cheney.

Army spokesman Randy King told The Washington Post Halliburton had done "an outstanding job," as the chief defense contractor in
Iraq but
Pentagon chiefs had decided they did not want "all our eggs in one basket."

He said the Texas-based, the US military's biggest contractor in Iraq, would be replaced when its contract comes up for renewal at the end of September.

After that the work will be split among three companies with a fourth firm hired to oversee the work of the other three.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060712/ts_alt_afp/usiraqmilitary_060712160219


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-12-06 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nice to see legit work can happen in DC and not just more GOP giveaways
Edited on Wed Jul-12-06 05:54 PM by blm
for their cronies. At least, for SOME of the time.

Pathetic that we have to cling to every small victory for what's right in this country, and regret how little of it is being done in DC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-12-06 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Agree, and now it's almost August! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ginnyinWI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-12-06 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. K&R for Dems who fight on relentlessly! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-12-06 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. Finally, we may see contracts awarded frairly.
This is an important step forward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 04:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC