|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
im10ashus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-17-06 10:54 AM Original message |
BREAKING: High court upholds Oregon assisted-suicide law 6-3 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrModerate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-17-06 10:56 AM Response to Original message |
1. With Scalia, Thomas, Roberts, and (soon) Alito as . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-17-06 10:58 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. That is why the DEMOCRATS MUST fillibuster alito |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrModerate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-17-06 11:00 AM Response to Reply #3 |
7. But they ain't gonna . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-17-06 11:34 AM Response to Reply #7 |
29. It ain't over tell the fat lady sings |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
question everything (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-17-06 11:17 AM Response to Reply #3 |
25. This is why the Democrats have to take back the Senate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-17-06 11:35 AM Response to Reply #25 |
31. I think the message is getting through |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-17-06 11:03 AM Response to Reply #1 |
14. Kennedy. That's part of why he wrote the majority opinion, I think. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tiggeroshii (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-17-06 10:57 AM Response to Original message |
2. does anybody ahve the names of all those who voted for it? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-17-06 11:01 AM Response to Reply #2 |
9. Well obviously everyone but Roberts, Scalia, and Thomas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SharonRB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-17-06 11:03 AM Response to Reply #9 |
13. I was posting my response as yours went up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tiggeroshii (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-17-06 11:12 AM Original message |
So even with Scalia, we'll still have a swing vote in kenendy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
question everything (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-17-06 11:20 AM Response to Original message |
27. Yes, Kennedy will be the next swing vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SharonRB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-17-06 11:03 AM Response to Reply #2 |
12. If Scalia, Thomas and Roberts dissented, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Straight Shooter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-17-06 10:58 AM Response to Original message |
4. As an Oregonian, I say to Roberts to butt out of my life. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
im10ashus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-17-06 11:00 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Good point. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrModerate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-17-06 11:02 AM Response to Reply #4 |
11. Roberts' butt is fully greased for insertion of the . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SharonRB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-17-06 11:00 AM Response to Original message |
6. The ruling is great news |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
im10ashus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-17-06 11:02 AM Response to Reply #6 |
10. I would have thought Roberts was a states' rights guy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Surya Gayatri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-17-06 11:10 AM Response to Reply #10 |
20. His conservative Catholic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
im10ashus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-17-06 11:13 AM Response to Reply #20 |
23. If Roe v. Wade is back on their docket. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Surya Gayatri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-17-06 11:19 AM Response to Reply #23 |
26. I'm afraid so, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elehhhhna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-17-06 11:00 AM Response to Original message |
8. let's call it "medically supervised" rather than "doctor assisted". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-17-06 11:03 AM Response to Reply #8 |
15. Not really. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Straight Shooter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-17-06 11:04 AM Response to Reply #8 |
16. Yes, that's a much better description. Thank you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Viva_La_Revolution (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-17-06 11:04 AM Response to Reply #8 |
17. unfortunately no. They don't supervise... they assist. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Saphire (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-17-06 11:06 AM Response to Original message |
18. So, Roberts was a good boy and did just what the right wanted? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-17-06 11:08 AM Response to Original message |
19. "States' rights" is your father's Republican Party. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
question everything (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-17-06 11:12 AM Response to Original message |
21. This is where Catholic Roberts votes his faith (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frustratedlady (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-17-06 11:12 AM Response to Original message |
22. I Wonder If That Decision Will Ease |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevedeshazer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-17-06 11:16 AM Response to Reply #22 |
24. Such a law did not exist in Louisiana, so no I don't think so. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
upperleftedge (93 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-17-06 11:31 AM Response to Reply #24 |
28. As an old guy from Oregon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevedeshazer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-17-06 02:01 PM Response to Reply #28 |
32. I agree completely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taguba (43 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-17-06 11:35 AM Response to Original message |
30. I guess states rights is not an "originalist" montra?? Only if it agrees |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 05:51 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC