Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

No rush to certify Mexican election

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-14-06 06:59 AM
Original message
No rush to certify Mexican election
It may come as a surprise to many Americans to hear that there is no winner yet in the Mexican presidential election. Although most news sources in the United States rushed to declare conservative Felipe Calderón the victor last week, when the completed vote count showed him with a 0.6-percent advantage, the race has not officially been called. With the work of Mexico's vote-counting body now done, the country's Federal Elections Court is responsible for verifying the count, resolving any outstanding disputes and announcing an official winner.

Part of Calderón's campaign strategy has been to behave as if the election is a done deal, and he is already president. We shouldn't play into this game by misunderstanding Mexico's electoral process or prematurely insisting on a victor.

Unlike the United States, Mexico has an extended lame-duck period after its elections. The next president will not take office until December. Moreover, Mexican law gives the Federal Elections Court until the first week of September to reach its decision. The court has the power to open ballot boxes, to mandate a vote-by-vote recount and even to order a new election. A full recount is now one of the central demands of progressive candidate Andrés Manuel López Obrador's campaign, with significant support in the wider electorate.

By taking advantage of the time afforded it and creating as much transparency as possible in its review, the Federal Elections Court can work to restore public confidence in the country's democratic institutions - something diminished by perceptions of irregularities in last week's vote-counting.

On Monday, López Obrador filed a challenge with the court alleging numerous problems with the election. While U.S. observers might feel inclined to see López Obrador's challenge as a case of sour grapes, most Mexicans recognize it as a legitimate part of the process. Given a long history of electoral fraud in the country, the candidate would be foolish not to question irregularities.


http://www.newsday.com/news/opinion/ny-openg144816289jul14,0,1553268.story?coll=ny-viewpoints-headlines


Read the rest of the article where they discuss Bush's congratulatory call to a candidate who is not a confirmed winner yet. And the article discusses what Obrador is contesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-14-06 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. Good editorial, thanks
The Mexican elections system is in a delicate place, but it is a well thought out system and far better than most in the world for election protection. Nobody should rush to judgment, as Bush did, from either side. In a vote this close, anything could come of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-14-06 07:21 AM
Response to Original message
2. I've seen many congratulatory calls to US presidential candidates before
the electoral college votes have even been sent to Washington to be counted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-14-06 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
3. Good article. Thanks for posting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC