Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Israel Violates Law on U.S. Weapons in Mideast"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 09:23 PM
Original message
"Israel Violates Law on U.S. Weapons in Mideast"
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/0718-07.htm
Published on Tuesday, July 18, 2006 by the Inter Press Service

Israel Violates Law on U.S. Weapons in Mideast


by Thalif Deen

UNITED NATIONS - Israel is in violation of U.S. arms control laws for deploying U.S.-made fighter planes, combat helicopters and missiles to kill civilians and destroy Lebanon's infrastructure in the ongoing six-day devastation of that militarily-weak country.

The death toll, according to published reports, is over 200 people -- mostly civilians -- while the economic losses have been estimated at about 100 million dollars per day.

"Section 4 of the (U.S.) Arms Export Control Act requires that military items transferred to foreign governments by the United States be used solely for internal security and legitimate self-defense," says Stephen Zunes, professor of politics at the University of San Francisco.

"Since Israeli attacks against Lebanon's civilian infrastructure and population centers clearly go beyond legitimate self-defense, the United States is legally obliged to suspend arms transfers to Israel," Zunes told IPS.

(snip)



According to the article, this view of the illegality of what Israel is doing with arms obtained from the US is shared by others. A senior research associate with the Arms Trade Resource Center at the World Policy Institute in New York said,


"As Israel jets bombard locations in Gaza, Haifa and Beirut, killing civilians (including as many as seven Canadians vacationing in Aitaroun), it is worth remembering that U.S. law is clear about how U.S.-origin weapons and military systems ought to be used," Berrigan told IPS.... "In light of this clear statement {in the U.S. Arms Export Control Act}, the United States has an opportunity to stave off further bloodshed and suffering by demanding that its weaponry and military aid not be used in attacks against Lebanon and elsewhere, and challenging Israeli assertions that it is using military force defensively."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BillZBubb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm sure they got a waiver from Busholini.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Yes, I'm sure the Chimperor would defy this law, but the fact that it
exists needs to be known. It gives some leverage to stop ignoring this law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. So, will the U.S. stop arms sales
or arms gifts to Israel?

I won't hold my breath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CuteNFuzzy Donating Member (444 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-19-06 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
14. of course not
The victims are of no concern to those who profit from the killing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnOhioan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. Thanks for posting
Edited on Tue Jul-18-06 09:29 PM by AnOhioan
I am pretty sure though that the chimp and company will ignore this law too. And more civilians die, and more radicals created, and so on, and so on, and so on.

It is just so tragic and sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlamoDemoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. Who in congress dares to question this violation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. Why do you think they keep calling it self-defense?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
7. K&R.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
8. I suppose those thousand rockets that Hezbollah shot at them were all
perfectly legal.

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-19-06 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #8
22. Probably not, but you don't have the world's only Super Power
and banks of Western media defending their actions against civilians, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
9. I believe the illegality UNDER US LAW of what Israel is doing to Lebanon
needs to be part of the discussion. Even aside from questions of morality, those who say "it's none of our business" are factually wrong as well.

I doubt most Americans know that they are paying for what Israel is doing to the civilians and infrastructure of Lebanon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
10. Sorry, no dice even if it's against the law. AIPAC got to our party...
...platform:

The Democratic Party is fundamentally committed to the security of our ally Israel and the creation of a comprehensive, just and lasting peace between Israel and her neighbors. Our special relationship with Israel is based on the unshakable foundation of shared values and a mutual commitment to democracy, and we will ensure that under all circumstances, Israel retains the qualitative edge for its national security and its right to self-defense. Jerusalem is the capital of Israel and should remain an undivided city accessible to people of all faiths.


  AIPAC plays a very tight game.

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Yes, the political influence has been relentless. Here's a recent WaPo
article on it:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/12/AR2006071201627_pf.html

A Beautiful Friendship?


In search of the truth about the Israel lobby's influence on Washington
By Glenn Frankel
Sunday, July 16, 2006; W13

(snip)

Thanks to the work of the lobby and its allies, Israel gets more direct foreign aid -- about $3 billion a year -- than any other nation. There's a file cabinet somewhere in the State Department full of memoranda of understanding on military, diplomatic and economic affairs. Israel gets treated like a NATO member when it comes to military matters and like Canada or Mexico when it comes to free trade. There's an annual calendar full of meetings of joint strategic task forces and other collaborative sessions. And there's a presidential pledge, re-avowed by Bush in the East Room, that the United States will come to Israel's aid in the event of attack.

On Capitol Hill the Israel lobby commands large majorities in both the House and Senate. Polls show strong public support for Israel -- a connection that has grown even deeper after the September 11 attacks. The popular equation goes like this: Israelis equal good guys, Arabs equal terrorists. Working the Hill these days, says Josh Block, spokesman for the premier Israeli lobbying group known as AIPAC, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, "is like pushing at an open door."

Not everyone believes this is a good thing. In March two distinguished political scientists -- Stephen Walt from Harvard and John Mearsheimer from the University of Chicago -- published a 42-page, heavily footnoted essay arguing that the Bush administration's support for Israel and its related effort to spread democracy throughout the Middle East have "inflamed Arab and Islamic opinion and jeopardized U.S. security."

The professors claim that our intimate partnership with Israel is both dangerous and unprecedented. "Other special interest groups have managed to skew foreign policy, but no lobby has managed to divert it as far from what the national interest would suggest," they argue. They go on to say that the war in Iraq "was due in large part to the Lobby's influence," and that the same combine is "using all of the strategies in its playbook" to pressure the administration into being aggressive and belligerent with Iran. The bottom line: "Israel's enemies get weakened or overthrown, Israel gets a free hand with the Palestinians, and the United States does most of the fighting, dying, rebuilding and paying."

(snip)


All too many Dem politicians have been swayed too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-19-06 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Thank you very much for posting that! Interesting read! n/t
PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-19-06 02:32 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Here's another interesting read on the power of the AIPAC lobby
in US politics, from the New Yorker magazine in 2005:
http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/050704fa_fact

There are some extremists in the Likud who have wanted the US to take out Iran for them for a long, long time. They want it very badly and have damn near set it all up: another major war, US vs. Iran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackNewtown Donating Member (703 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-19-06 03:08 AM
Response to Reply #10
17. The facts on the Israeli and Arab lobbies. You decide
Here are the figures for 2004:

pro-Israeli PACs:

Party Split:
Dems:
Repubs:
Others: $3,760,996
$2,190,124
$1,000

Total contributions to All Candidates: $5,952,120

http://www.opensecrets.org/industries/summary.asp?Ind=Q05&recipdetail=A&sortorder=U&Cycle=2004

pro-Arab PACs: $109,000

http://www.opensecrets.org/pacs/lookup2.asp?strid=C00194225&cycle=2004
http://www.opensecrets.org/pacs/lookup2.asp?strid=C00346239&cycle=2004

Top receipents of money in 2004

Pro-Israel:
Money to Congress

Election cycle: All Cycles 2006 2004 2002 2000 1998 1996 1994 1992 1990

List: Summary Top 20 Members All Senators All Members of the House All Senate Candidates All House Candidates Sort by Amount Sort by Name Sort by State

Candidate
Amount

Bush, George W (R)
$262,766

Daschle, Tom (D-SD)
$245,075

Specter, Arlen (R-PA)
$235,200

Lieberman, Joe (D-CT)
$231,050

Wyden, Ron (D-OR)
$162,950

Boxer, Barbara (D-CA)
$142,110

Murray, Patty (D-WA)
$130,745

Mikulski, Barbara A (D-MD)
$127,125

Lantos, Tom (D-CA)
$124,600

Deutsch, Peter (D-FL)
$119,400

Feingold, Russell D (D-WI)
$113,703

Brownback, Sam (R-KS)
$98,600

Berkley, Shelley (D-NV)
$98,044

Dodd, Chris (D-CT)
$97,150

Schumer, Charles E (D-NY)
$96,000

Bennett, Robert F (R-UT)
$95,750

Bayh, Evan (D-IN)
$95,250

Reid, Harry (D-NV)
$94,200

Frost, Martin (D-TX)
$92,654

Inouye, Daniel K (D-HI)
$91,200


Pro-Arab, doesn't come in a list based on $$$ contributed but here is the data. http://www.opensecrets.org/pacs/lookup2.asp?strid=C00346239&cycle=2004

2006

Pro-Israel: All Candidates: $1,754,504
Incumbents Only: $1,703,032

http://www.opensecrets.org/industries/summary.asp?Ind=Q05&recipdetail=A&sortorder=U&Cycle=2006

Pro-Arab: $4,000 in total

http://www.opensecrets.org/pacs/lookup2.asp?strid=C00194225&cycle=2006


Pro-Israel:
Money to Congress

Election cycle: 2006

List: Summary Top 20 Members All Senators All Members of the House All Senate Candidates All House Candidates Sort by Amount Sort by Name Sort by State

Candidate
Amount

Clinton, Hillary Rodham (D-NY)
$83,818

Kyl, Jon (R-AZ)
$79,750

Stabenow, Debbie (D-MI)
$77,406

Kirk, Mark (R-IL)
$66,664

Nelson, Ben (D-NE)
$65,500

Conrad, Kent (D-ND)
$63,600

Lieberman, Joe (D-CT)
$63,000

Talent, James M (R-MO)
$61,010

Nelson, Bill (D-FL)
$60,111

Santorum, Rick (R-PA)
$57,000

Berkley, Shelley (D-NV)
$44,000

Menendez, Robert (D-NJ)
$43,611

Lugar, Richard G (R-IN)
$39,710

Hoyer, Steny H (D-MD)
$37,250

Feinstein, Dianne (D-CA)
$33,500

DeWine, Mike (R-OH)
$33,000

Engel, Eliot L (D-NY)
$32,000

Ros-Lehtinen, Ileana (R-FL)
$30,500

Carper, Tom (D-DE)
$29,650

Cardin, Ben (D-MD)
$29,192

Pro-Arab: $4,000

http://www.opensecrets.org/pacs/lookup2.asp?strid=C00194225&cycle=2006


The interesting thing is that virtually every Senator gets a substantial amount from AIPAC when they are up for election. The data for all Senators in 2004.

Candidate
Amount

Daschle, Tom (D-SD)
$245,075

Specter, Arlen (R-PA)
$235,200

Lieberman, Joe (D-CT)
$231,050

Wyden, Ron (D-OR)
$162,950

Boxer, Barbara (D-CA)
$142,110

Murray, Patty (D-WA)
$130,745

Mikulski, Barbara A (D-MD)
$127,125

Feingold, Russell D (D-WI)
$113,703

Brownback, Sam (R-KS)
$98,600

Dodd, Chris (D-CT)
$97,150

Schumer, Charles E (D-NY)
$96,000

Bennett, Robert F (R-UT)
$95,750

Bayh, Evan (D-IN)
$95,250

Reid, Harry (D-NV)
$94,200

Inouye, Daniel K (D-HI)
$91,200

Shelby, Richard C (R-AL)
$83,900

Grassley, Chuck (R-IA)
$73,500

Bunning, Jim (R-KY)
$71,150

Murkowski, Lisa (R-AK)
$68,850

Dorgan, Byron L (D-ND)
$63,390

Lincoln, Blanche (D-AR)
$60,149

Voinovich, George V (R-OH)
$54,100

Bond, Christopher S 'Kit' (R-MO)
$44,450

Crapo, Mike (R-ID)
$40,577

McCain, John (R-AZ)
$38,000

Chambliss, Saxby (R-GA)
$31,750

Campbell, Ben Nighthorse (R-CO)
$22,951

Coleman, Norm (R-MN)
$10,000

Kerry, John (D)
$10,000

Conrad, Kent (D-ND)
$6,250

Clinton, Hillary Rodham (D-NY)
$6,000

Feinstein, Dianne (D-CA)
$6,000

Talent, James M (R-MO)
$6,000

Kyl, Jon (R-AZ)
$5,000

Stabenow, Debbie (D-MI)
$5,000

Santorum, Rick (R-PA)
$4,000

Durbin, Dick (D-IL)
$3,500

Lautenberg, Frank R (D-NJ)
$2,728

Dole, Elizabeth (R-NC)
$2,300

Graham, Bob (D)
$2,000

Leahy, Patrick (D-VT)
$2,000

Stevens, Ted (R-AK)
$2,000

Biden, Joseph R Jr (D-DE)
$1,500

Johnson, Tim (D-SD)
$1,500

Carper, Tom (D-DE)
$1,250

Cornyn, John (R-TX)
$1,000

Domenici, Pete V (R-NM)
$1,000

Kennedy, Edward M (D-MA)
$1,000

Edwards, John (D)
$500

http://www.opensecrets.org/industries/summary.asp?Ind=Q05&cycle=2004&recipdetail=S&Mem=Y

Look at the 2006 list and you see the likes of Clinton and Kyl skyrocket since they are running this year.

Pro-Israel:
Money to Congress

Election cycle: All Cycles 2006 2004 2002 2000 1998 1996 1994 1992 1990

List: Summary Top 20 Members All Senators All Members of the House All Senate Candidates All House Candidates Sort by Amount Sort by Name Sort by State

Candidate
Amount

Clinton, Hillary Rodham (D-NY)
$83,818

Kyl, Jon (R-AZ)
$79,750

Stabenow, Debbie (D-MI)
$77,406

Nelson, Ben (D-NE)
$65,500

Conrad, Kent (D-ND)
$63,600

Lieberman, Joe (D-CT)
$63,000

Talent, James M (R-MO)
$61,010

Nelson, Bill (D-FL)
$60,111

Santorum, Rick (R-PA)
$57,000

Menendez, Robert (D-NJ)
$43,611

Lugar, Richard G (R-IN)
$39,710

Feinstein, Dianne (D-CA)
$33,500

DeWine, Mike (R-OH)
$33,000

Carper, Tom (D-DE)
$29,650

Burns, Conrad (R-MT)
$28,500

Akaka, Daniel K (D-HI)
$26,500

Ensign, John (R-NV)
$22,000

Allen, George (R-VA)
$20,500

Kennedy, Edward M (D-MA)
$13,000

Lott, Trent (R-MS)
$13,000

Snowe, Olympia J (R-ME)
$13,000

Thomas, Craig (R-WY)
$11,000

Martinez, Mel (R-FL)
$10,000

Bingaman, Jeff (D-NM)
$6,500

McConnell, Mitch (R-KY)
$6,010

Johnson, Tim (D-SD)
$6,000

Stevens, Ted (R-AK)
$5,000

Cantwell, Maria (D-WA)
$4,844

Vitter, David (R-LA)
$4,500

Baucus, Max (D-MT)
$4,000

Coleman, Norm (R-MN)
$4,000

Biden, Joseph R Jr (D-DE)
$2,100

Durbin, Dick (D-IL)
$2,000

Inhofe, James M (R-OK)
$2,000

Sessions, Jeff (R-AL)
$2,000

Chafee, Lincoln D (R-RI)
$1,500

Collins, Susan M (R-ME)
$1,000

Hatch, Orrin G (R-UT)
$1,000

McCain, John (R-AZ)
$1,000

Reed, Jack (D-RI)
$1,000

Specter, Arlen (R-PA)
$1,000

http://www.opensecrets.org/industries/summary.asp?Ind=Q05&recipdetail=S&sortorder=A&Cycle=2006

Politically, there is no incentive in not supporting AIPAC's positions.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pyro858 Donating Member (120 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
11. Israel is God's Country
The law doesn't apply to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jara sang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #11
29. delete
Edited on Fri Jul-21-06 02:33 PM by Jara sang
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jara sang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. delete again
Edited on Fri Jul-21-06 02:45 PM by Jara sang
sorry just woke up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-19-06 02:49 AM
Response to Original message
16. Israel is claiming Iran is behind all the violence:
Clearly, these radical elements of the Likud want the US to attack Iran (and the neocon dogs in the US are howling along with them):

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/5192990.stm
Last Updated: Tuesday, 18 July 2006, 22:35 GMT 23:35 UK

Israel claims Iran link to crisis


Hezbollah's capture of two Israeli soldiers last week was timed to divert attention from Tehran's nuclear programme, the Israeli PM has claimed.

Ehud Olmert said that the cross-border raid in which the two soldiers were taken and eight others killed was co-ordinated with Tehran.

(snip)

Israel has frequently blamed Syria and Iran for arming and backing Hezbollah, but Mr Olmert's comments were the first explicit claim of Tehran's direct involvement in the capture of the soldiers, correspondents say.

Mr Olmert said the timing of the incident was not an accident, and the international community at the G8 summit in Russia had fallen for it - discussing Lebanon rather than Iran's nuclear programme.

(snip)




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-19-06 03:09 AM
Response to Original message
18. We'll just veto any UN Sanctions...
like we always do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-19-06 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. The US has already blocked a UN call for a cease-fire, the only nation
out of 15 on the UN Security Council to oppose it:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x2392488

US Ambassador to the UN (and when will this monstrous recess Bush appointee be removed from office?) John Bolton says that there is "no moral equivalence" between the deaths of Lebanese civilians under Israel's devastating attack on that country's people and infrastructure is and the deaths of civilians due to the actions of terrorists:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x2395781

The Vatican disagreed with Bolton's moralistic pronouncements. Said the Vatican Secretary of State: "The right of defence on the part of a state does not exempt it from its responsibility to respect international law, particularly regarding the safeguarding of civilian populations."
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x2389737
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mr blur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-19-06 03:50 AM
Response to Original message
19. TOON:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-19-06 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
21. Our tax dollars are going to Bomb Lebanese Civilian Targets. When
is someone going to do something about this? Can we get a lawsuit against the government for violating laws of how our tax dollars are used? This isn't the only instance of Bush using our money for purposes that it wasn't intended that are against the law. He invaded a sovereign country without Congress giving him War Powers.

How much more of this will we take?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-19-06 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #21
25. Not just US tax dollars
Edited on Wed Jul-19-06 11:12 AM by slackmaster
I could tell you about another industrial North American democracy that supplies advanced intelligence-gathering technology and equipment to the Israeli defense forces, eh? But then I'd have to shoot you.

:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosemary2205 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-19-06 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
23. "Legitimate self defense"
Considering there's a bit of a tussle over whether Israel is defending itself or not - I do believe Commondreams may be pushing that "illegal" label a little bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-19-06 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
24. There's that nagging subjective word "legitimate" again
It always comes down to a personal opinion about what constitutes legitimate self-defense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-19-06 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. It's up to the defender to make the case and garner support.
Edited on Wed Jul-19-06 11:43 AM by rucky
And there are some pretty clear guidlines in the Geneva Conventions and other rules of law that will support actions (or not).

In this case, both sides feel they're justified in their actions, but they haven't even tried to make the case to the international community - much beyond saying that they're right and the other guy is wrong. It's immature, pathetic and disrespectful that both sides don't answer critical questions with anything but a raised middle finger.

But really, why should they, when they get *unconditional* support from their backers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-19-06 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
27. Here is what is paid for by our taxes:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x2399146
thread title (July 19, 2006): LAT: Dazed Refugees Flood Beirut: Lebanon faces vast humanitarian crisis

"Isolated by its crippled airport, blockaded seaports and bombed roads, Lebanon has seen its food and medical supplies dwindle to dangerously low levels. Officials are struggling to accommodate the massive waves of the displaced and reach people left in warfare-racked areas. They are also keenly aware that even towns that have escaped the bombings will soon run out of basic commodities...."

The number of displaced Lebanese is estimated in the LAT article at 500,000. So far. That will increase markedly as food and basic necessities run out. Israeli bombings have hit roads, ports, bridges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
28. One more kick. And these murderous attacks on Lebanese civilians
and infrastructure will not even promote Israel's security. Hezbollah's success sprang originally to Israel's earlier actions in Lebanon - so what new rounds of anti-Israel terrorism will this spawn? You can bet they will come.

My own opinion is that the governments of Israel and the US KNOW this and are deliberately inciting an attack by Syria and/or Iran. Elements in these governments have wanted war with Iran for a long time. It's the only thing that makes sense to me - becasue these attacks do NOT defend Israel from terrorism, they will stimulate more of it. Maybe this incitement is what is all about after all. That's what I believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jara sang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
31. Careful posting anti-Israel information, you will be labeled anti-semite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
32. Yeah, and the UN told Hezbollah to disarm a long time ago.
So?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
33. Well, we can trust our "leaders" to step right in and stop it.
Can't we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 03:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC