Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Borrow and spend Gov't going broke. Wants to raise the debt-limit.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-30-05 12:13 PM
Original message
Borrow and spend Gov't going broke. Wants to raise the debt-limit.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20051230/pl_afp/uspoliticseconomy_051230161316

Those "fiscally responsible" Republicans have outspent the credit card again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-30-05 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Dammit! I want my debt limit raised, too. What do you think the
chances are of that happening?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patriotvoice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-30-05 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Individual: Close to 0%, Government: Close to 100%
Reason: Individuals have, probably, defaulted on a debt at least once. The government never has. One day, it will, and that will be the start of the brutal downward spiral.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merwin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-30-05 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. What's the point of a debt limit if you can raise it whenever you want to?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-30-05 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. A very good point you have here. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patriotvoice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-30-05 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. To give the appearance that politicians care how much they spend.
Congress deciding when to raise its debt-limit embodies absolutely no check and balance on which our government was founded. I suppose one could argue that the President has to sign it into law, affording an Executive check on a Legislative measure, but in reality, both the Executive and Legislative branch always benefit from a larger credit card; they can do more with less push back. So, it seems the check and balance is vacuous.

I believe the problem is that it's in the interest of every politician to have a larger budget, so no intra-politic system of checks and balance will effectively work. To handle it in the current system, we'd have to continue to not vote for "spenders" (regardless of whether they're "taxers"), but we can only do that after the spendings happened, and often after the debt ceiling is raised, so there's no way to effectively lower the spending.

I wish people would understand that "tax and spend" is better than "spend," but neither is smart. I wish people would demand that budget and spending being part of campaign platforms. Their really doesn't seem to be an fiscal conservative faction at work anywhere in the government, and -- you guessed it -- I wish there was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-30-05 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. The goal of this EVIL regime is to bankrupt the USA nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-30-05 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
7. Well, we could sell Texas to China if they were dumb enough
to buy it and we threw in Oklahoma and Kansas and our first-born children. Naaah..they'll just wait to foreclose on what we owe them now and take it all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-30-05 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
8. This rethug Congress reminds me of that old joke .....



"I can't be overdrawn. I still have more checks."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC