Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pat Buchanan BRAND NEW Column (30-minutes old) - HARD HITTING!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
New Government Donating Member (241 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 08:11 PM
Original message
Pat Buchanan BRAND NEW Column (30-minutes old) - HARD HITTING!
Without getting into the Buchanan pros and cons, his new column ("No, This is Not Our War") was just emailed to me and was posted on the web thirty minutes ago. I am quite shocked Worldnet Daily allowed this on their site. He had written a piece that made it clear where he stood a couple of days ago, but this new one is - honestly - as hard-hitting and on-target as anything written on the current Midlle East War.

If we could refrain from the, "But Pat one time said (fill-in-the-blank)." I know he has said and done some things that none of us would agree with. He has also done and said things that nearly ALL of us would agree with. So, leaving Pat's history out - read this with an open mind and I expect most will agree that this new piece becomes the new must-read column on this issue. No Democrat, Republican, Green, Socialist, Communist, Islamist, nobody could have said this any better. Warning: Pro-Israeli supporters of Israel's actions will hate this with a passion:

http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=51164

------------------------
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. so now we are linking to WND?


* from the homepage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. On no!!!! Banned Coulter..... Hey, I like the sound of that. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Government Donating Member (241 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Read the editorial and you'll see why.
It's the only place the editorial is on the web. It pushes a VERY progressive and non-intervention path for the US. It is VERY HARD on this administration. Policing where "acceptable" information comes from is a sign of weakness and fear. Read it - and then gripe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. At Least He's Not Linking Stormfront
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Government Donating Member (241 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. Oh, PLEASE.
What is this with the policing of information? That's a big problem with our divided society today:
"Our sites": Perfect, all good and correct information.
"Their sites": Evil, all bad and incorrrect information.
Aren't you bigger than that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. Watch him on MSNBC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluerum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. Hardly hard hitting. More like stating the obvious.
Edited on Thu Jul-20-06 08:20 PM by bluerum
One wonders if these Christians care about what is happening to our Christian brethren in Lebanon and Gaza, who have had all power cut off by Israeli airstrikes, an outlawed form of collective punishment, that has left them with no sanitation, rotting food, impure water and days without light or electricity in the horrible heat of July.


There are probably a few muslims and people of other assorted religious stripes besides christian in Lebanon but that small detail seems not be worth pointing out for the B man.

on edit: added excerpt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. I think Pat sums it well: christians are worth more than the rest of the
world. Nothing new here. The same old racist he has always been.



One wonders if these Christians care about what is happening to our Christian brethren in Lebanon and Gaza,




I am not surprised that you cant see that, but unfortunately, it is not about what he said once, it is about who he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. No kidding. I choose this sentence because it is typical of Buchanan.
Careful, someday, you will see something Bush says that you like and will say Bush is great, the way you go.

Even when the facts in an article are correct, you can still use them for an agenda that is dangerous. This is my problem with this editorial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. I Didn't Notice That.
Pat has been introducing the word "Christian" into his arguments lately.

I think he's doing this to whip up anti-Israel sentiment.

Perhaps Israel deserves to be criticized but that's an awful way to slime them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. Pat Buchanan has always said his agenda was the christian occident.
He thinks the US should be a Christian Empire. He has an history of racist remarks and, even if by now he has learned how to be PC, all you have to do is to listen to him past his Bush criticism to realize his agenda is far from a progressive agenda. The ennemy of our ennemy is not necessarily our friend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. He's Also A Racist, Misogynist, and Homophobe



I hope nobody here isn't brazen enough to ask me to document my claims.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
WhollyHeretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #26
43. Stop the damn whining
You must be pretty dense not to expect criticism when you praise and post articles by a well known racist, homophobe, misogynist, and anti-semite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #43
49. Attack the argument, not the arguer
I could give a rat's 4$$ about his moral failings. An argument stands or falls on its own weight, not the morality of the person making it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostInAnomie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. That is some of the lamest cherry picking I have ever seen.
Did you even read the article of just skim over it looking for something to take out of context?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. OK, if you like Buchanan, feel free. I know there are a number of
people who seem to want to ignore who Buchanan is. Sorry that I cant go over his past.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Government Donating Member (241 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. Are you an official with the "Purity Police"????
People like you scare the hell out of me.
Allow thoughts to stand on their own! The Purity Police require 100% adherance to all past, current and future views of the "vanguard."

---
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. I could not care less what you think. I just state what I think of him.
Apparently, somewhere, it disturbs you. Too bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SPKrazy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #22
42. Purity Police?
PP?

Pat is a racist, homophobic, fascist, Jew hating bigot.

He could care less about any of it except that he hates Israel
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #14
24. Can I Link davidduke.com and Stormfront
Their "takes " are no different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Government Donating Member (241 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. That is so completely ridiculous ----- nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostInAnomie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #24
40. I wouldn't care what you link.
Edited on Thu Jul-20-06 09:06 PM by LostInAnomie
If it is crap then I will call it crap on its merits. My values aren't so hypersensitive that I can't bear to read something out of fear it might offend me.

My guess is that you didn't even bother to read the article. You are just posting non-sequiturs and hoping for kudos from like minded individuals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Government Donating Member (241 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
10. Snippets
For those who snap to Kool-Aid judgement:

On American TV, former Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu says the ruination of Lebanon is Hezbollah's doing. But is it Hezbollah that is using U.S.-built F-16s, with precision-guided bombs and 155-mm artillery pieces to wreak death and devastation on Lebanon?

~

No, Israel is doing this, with the blessing and without a peep of protest from President Bush. And we wonder why they hate us. "Today, we are all Israelis!" brayed Ken Mehlman of the Republican National Committee to a gathering of Christians United for Israel.
~

"Why wait?" Well, one reason is that the United States has not been attacked. A second is a small thing called the Constitution. Where does George W. Bush get the authority to launch a war on Iran? When did Congress declare war or authorize a war on Iran? Answer: It never did. But these neoconservatives care no more about the Constitution than they cared about the truth when they lied into war in Iraq.
~

No, Kenny boy, we are not "all Israelis." Some of us still think of ourselves as Americans, first, last and always And, no, Mr. Kristol, this is not "our war." It's your war.

--------------------





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DELUSIONAL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
11. My world is upside down -- I agree with him.
No, Kenny boy, we are not "all Israelis." Some of us still think of ourselves as Americans, first, last and always
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
12. OMG...Now we're embracing Pat Buchanan???*&^%$#@
DU has gone over the edge.

I will not click on that link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Government Donating Member (241 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #12
28. So, you only read "accepted" material? That you KNOW you'll agree with?
That's lazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. NO, it's called preserving my sanity..thank you very much.
Pat Buchanan is a racist. I don't pollute my brain with his shit.

http://www.salon.com/news/feature/1999/09/04/pat/print.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #28
36. Here: Indulge yourself.
Immigrants and People of Color
"There is nothing wrong with us sitting down and arguing that issue that we are a European country." (Newsday, 11/15/92)

Buchanan on affirmative action: "How, then, can the feds justify favoring sons of Hispanics over sons of white Americans who fought in World War II or Vietnam?" (syndicated column, 1/23/95)

In a September 1993 speech to the Christian Coalition, Buchanan described multiculturalism as "an across-the-board assault on our Anglo-American heritage."

"If we had to take a million immigrants in, say Zulus, next year, or Englishmen, and put them up in Virginia, what group would be easier to assimilate and would cause less problems for the people of Virginia?" ("This Week With David Brinkley," 1/8/91)

Remarks about Jewish Population
Referred to Capitol Hill as "Israeli-occupied territory." (St. Louis Post Dispatch, 10/20/90)

During the Gulf crisis: "There are only two groups that are beating the drums for war in the Middle East -- the Israeli defense ministry and its 'amen corner' in the United States." ("McLaughlin Group," 8/26/90)

In a 1977 column, Buchanan said that despite Hitler's anti-Semitic and genocidal tendencies, he was "an individual of great courage...Hitler's success was not based on his extraordinary gifts alone. His genius was an intuitive sense of the mushiness, the character flaws, the weakness masquerading as morality that was in the hearts of the statesmen who stood in his path." (The Guardian, 1/14/92)

Writing of "group fantasies of martyrdom," Buchanan challenged the historical record that thousands of Jews were gassed to death by diesel exhaust at Treblinka: "Diesel engines do not emit enough carbon monoxide to kill anybody." (New Republic, 10/22/90) Buchanan's columns have run in the Liberty Lobby's Spotlight, the German-American National PAC newsletter and other publications that claim Nazi death camps are a Zionist concoction.

Buchanan called for closing the U.S. Justice Department's Office of Special Investigations, which prosecuted Nazi war criminals, because it was "running down 70-year-old camp guards." (New York Times, 4/21/87)

Buchanan was vehement in pushing President Reagan -- despite protests -- to visit Germany's Bitburg cemetery, where Nazi SS troops were buried. At a White House meeting, Buchanan reportedly reminded Jewish leaders that they were "Americans first" -- and repeatedly scrawled the phrase "Succumbing to the pressure of the Jews" in his notebook. Buchanan was credited with crafting Ronald Reagan's line that the SS troops buried at Bitburg were "victims just as surely as the victims in the concentration camps." (New York Times, 5/16/85; New Republic, 1/22/96)

After Cardinal O'Connor criticized anti-Semitism during the controversy over construction of a convent near Auschwitz, Buchanan wrote: "If U.S. Jewry takes the clucking appeasement of the Catholic cardinalate as indicative of our submission, it is mistaken. When Cardinal O'Connor of New York seeks to soothe the always irate Elie Wiesel by reassuring him 'there are many Catholics who are anti-Semitic'...he speaks for himself. Be not afraid, Your Eminence; just step aside, there are bishops and priests ready to assume the role of defender of the faith." (New Republic, 10/22/90)

The Buchanan '96 campaign's World Wide Web site included an article blaming the death of White House aide Vincent Foster on the Israeli intelligence agency, Mossad -- and alleging that Foster and Hillary Clinton were Mossad spies. (The campaign removed the article after its existence was reported by a Jewish on-line news service; Jewish Telegraphic Agency, 2/21/96.)

In his September 1993 speech to the Christian Coalition, Buchanan declared: "Our culture is superior. Our culture is superior because our religion is Christianity and that is the truth that makes men free." (ADL Report, 1994)

On Gays
In a 1972 memo to Richard Nixon, Buchanan referred to one of George McGovern's leading financial contributors as a "screaming fairy." (Newsday, 2/8/89) Buchanan has repeatedly used the term "sodomites," and has referred to gays as "the pederast proletariat." (Washington Post, 2/9/92)

"Homosexuality involves sexual acts most men consider not only immoral, but filthy. The reason public men rarely say aloud what most say privately is they are fearful of being branded 'bigots' by an intolerant liberal orthodoxy that holds, against all evidence and experience, that homosexuality is a normal, healthy lifestyle." (syndicated column, 9/3/89)

In a 1977 column urging a "thrashing" of gay groups, Buchanan wrote: "Homosexuality is not a civil right. Its rise almost always is accompanied, as in the Weimar Republic, with a decay of society and a collapse of its basic cinder block, the family." (New Republic, 3/30/92)

"Gay rights activists seek to substitute, for laws rooted in Judeo-Christian morality, laws rooted in the secular humanist belief that all consensual sexual acts are morally equal. That belief is anti-biblical and amoral; to codify it into law is to codify a lie." (Buchanan column in Wall Street Journal, 1/21/93)

On AIDS, Buchanan wrote in 1983: "The poor homosexuals -- they have declared war upon nature, and now nature is extracting an awful retribution (AIDS)." (Los Angeles Times, 11/28/86) Later that year, he demanded that New York City Ed Koch and New York Gov. Mario Cuomo cancel the Gay Pride Parade or else "be held personally responsible for the spread of the AIDS plague." "With 80,000 dead of AIDS, our promiscuous homosexuals appear literally hell-bent on Satanism and suicide," Buchanan wrote in 1990 (syndicated column, 10/17/90). In the 1992 campaign, he declared: "AIDS is nature's retribution for violating the laws of nature." (Seattle Times, 7/31/93)

On Women
"Rail as they will about 'discrimination,' women are simply not endowed by nature with the same measures of single-minded ambition and the will to succeed in the fiercely competitive world of Western capitalism." (syndicated column, 11/22/83)

"The real liberators of American women were not the feminist noise-makers, they were the automobile, the supermarket, the shopping center, the dishwasher, the washer-dryer, the freezer." (Right from the Beginning, p. 149)

"If a woman has come to believe that divorce is the answer to every difficult marriage, that career comes before children ... no democratic government can impose another set of values upon her." (Right from the Beginning, p. 341)

On Democracy
Attacking what he considers the "democratist temptation, the worship of democracy as a form of governance," Buchanan commented: "Like all idolatries, democratism substitutes a false god for the real, a love of process for a love of country." (Patrick J. Buchanan: From the Right, newsletter, Spring/90)

In a January, 1991 column, Buchanan suggested that "quasi-dictatorial rule" might be the solution to the problems of big municipalities and the federal fiscal crisis: "If the people are corrupt, the more democracy, the worse the government." (Washington Times, 1/9/91) He has written disparagingly of the "one man, one vote Earl Warren system."

In Right from the Beginning, Buchanan refers to Spanish dictator Francisco Franco as a "Catholic savior." He called Franco, along with Chile's Gen. Pinochet, "soldier-patriots." (syndicated column 9/17/89) Both men overthrew democracy in their countries.

Buchanan devotes a chapter of his autobiography -- "As We Remember Joe" -- to defending Senator Joe McCarthy. He advocated that Nixon "burn the tapes" during Watergate, and he criticized Reagan for failing to pardon Oliver North over Iran-contra.

Buchanan, shortly before he announced he was running for president in 1995: "You just wait until 1996, then you'll see a real right-wing tyrant." (The Nation, 6/26/95)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
areo64 Donating Member (30 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
15. World Net Daily runs antiwar stuff?!
I know it's a paleoconservative like Buchanan, but I think the point still stands that I'm very surprised by WND!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
populistdriven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
19. K&R because repukes fighting repukes is good
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
21. Good for Pat Buchanan!
He is on the money when he takes on PNAC and their fellow drones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
23. When Buchanan and Nader are on the same side - holy mackerel
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
29. OUCH
On AIDS, Buchanan wrote in 1983: "The poor homosexuals -- they have declared war upon nature, and now nature is extracting an awful retribution (AIDS)."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Government Donating Member (241 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. So
Edited on Thu Jul-20-06 08:44 PM by New Government
With your logic, if you read something, they have to have NEVER said anything you disagree with? You demand 100% political purity? If not - light the bonfires? That kind of thing DEMANDS comparisons to 1933 Germany. The books may have even said the, "right thing" according to the Reich - just authored by the "wrong person." Do you really want to go down that road? Do you want to know every single damning quote from anyone you read an article from? And you wonder why some of us call that kind of political purity - lunacy? You might want to visit:
http://www.ushmm.org/museum/exhibit/online/bookburning/burning.php
And yes, it's the same thing!


-------
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. I'm Just Adding Texture
White House advisor Buchanan urged President Nixon in an April 1969 memo not to visit "the Widow King" on the first anniversary of Martin Luther King's assassination, warning that a visit would "outrage many, many people who believe Dr. King was a fraud and a demagogue and perhaps worse.... Others consider him the Devil incarnate. Dr. King is one of the most divisive men in contemporary history." (New York Daily News, 10/1/90)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Government Donating Member (241 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. Great Texture - Look at your avatar
Do you pull out your dossier on every public person so that you only read material that is written by people who have been PERFECT human beings? Or, individuals who have only written what YOU believe 100% of the time? Some "texture".........I would call it character assassination. I could find some quotes from your avatar (Bobby Kennedy) that would make your blood boil. Are you forgetting your hero ORDERED the wiretapping of Martin Luther King? See what a mess you get into when seeking political purity?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. Some people are able to look at an entire life and to
Edited on Thu Jul-20-06 08:57 PM by Mass
decide whether they will trust a person or not. Other will simply quote anybody, whoever this person and the agenda is, because the person happens to say something that they like.

I think that there is no accident that DemocratSinceBirth and I have the same avatar. We are able to realize that Buchanan is still the same Buchanan he was 10 or 20 years ago who is globally a racist conservative, while RFK, whatever his mistakes, is globally a progressive.

Now, I dont care if you like Buchanan. I happen to dislike him and think I have the right to say so without being attacked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #34
38. I Have No Problem With Criticizing Israel
I just think one needs clean hands upon entering this debate.

The words of an avowed racist, homophobe, anti-semite, xenophobe, and misogynist has no moral standing in this debate because his motives are suspect.

Buchanan emphasizes the religion of the antagonists?

Why



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. I agree totally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. RFK Wasn't A Cardboard Saint But He Didn't Say This:
"There were no politics to polarize us then, to magnify every slight. The "negroes" of Washington had their public schools, restaurants, bars, movie houses, playgrounds and churches; and we had ours."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #30
44. Why should I listen to anyone who says this?
In 1990, Buchanan spewed out another hate-filled sound bite: "With 80,000 dead of AIDS, 3,000 more buried each month, our promiscuous homosexuals appear literally hell-bent on Satanism and suicide."

People who call me a Satanist don't merit being listened to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #44
48. Buchanan Is A Piece Of Work.
I couldn't find the quoute but when he was applauding the Hardwick v GA decision he said there's "no right to sodomy" in the Constitution.

Maybe he hates the IDF because gays can openly serve in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
37. Wow. Pat, I agree with you on this on.
Nice when someone like Pat wake up, even if only briefly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pretzel4gore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
39. forget it's buchanon...instead say 'bigshot rightwing boor,
longtime bushevik, ex nixon speechwriter' and soon says....'the ongoing lebanon atrocity is the work of some really horrible bastards' etc....
i mean who gives a fukk about buchanon? what's at issue is getting the political force ontrack to stop the murder of innocents in the ME; everything else is bush's shit.
in canada, the fukkin pigmedia is spending all their time making crocodial tears about the '50 thousand' canadians trapped in lebanon, and barely a word about the nushmonkees creating the mess to begin with, as if the mess is a natural disaster; it's interviewing some guy in a bar time again, as fukking usual.....
simone weill was right: evil as it exists in reality truly is boring, a humdrum waste of time (while portrayed in fiction, evil is, otoh, compelling and exciting etc)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
45. It was weird.
I was watching Bob Shrum and Pat Buchanan on Hardball and I was cheering Buchanan and wishing Shrum would shut up. Is it the end of the world yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
46. Yuk, .....I read it but, yuk Anne the dark queen staring at me? yuk, puke
Edited on Thu Jul-20-06 09:19 PM by IChing
Ok, now that I threw up, my take on Pat's line.


Anytime the right attack the right I'm for it, we eat our own enough around here. So here is the quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Today, we are all Israelis!" brayed Ken Mehlman of the Republican National Committee to a gathering of Christians United for Israel.
"No, Kenny boy, we are not "all Israelis." Some of us still think of ourselves as Americans, first, last and always"

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now where is my flag? I need something to wrap myself around after throwing up..........and I need to wipe my chin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
47. I hate having to agree with him, but he's actually right.
His analysis is spot on. He also kept a sane mind when it came to the illegal invasion of Iraq.

Buchanan is a Republican. It's good to be reminded they aren't extinct yet.

What we are dealing with is America's first (and hopefully last) Neo-Conservative president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
50. Locking
This is not the proper contesxt for linking to a highly partisan conservative site.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC