|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 06:03 PM Original message |
"95% of taxes in this country are paid by rich ($100k per annum) people" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rabrrrrrr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 06:05 PM Response to Original message |
1. I believe that's pretty close to the truth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yupster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 06:23 PM Response to Reply #1 |
9. But it's only income tax |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 07:05 PM Response to Reply #1 |
21. That makes sense, but they also have most of the money. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stargazer99 (943 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 07:14 PM Response to Reply #21 |
26. Iris has got it right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 07:23 PM Response to Reply #26 |
30. damn, Stargazer99! Welcome to DU! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maxrandb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-23-06 08:08 AM Response to Reply #26 |
72. I also firnly believe that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FUGW (237 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 07:08 PM Response to Reply #1 |
24. Dude even if you make $250K a year that does not make you rick. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stargazer99 (943 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 07:16 PM Response to Reply #24 |
27. Making less than $12,000 annually |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 07:31 PM Response to Reply #24 |
36. Maybe this will help you: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fordnut (207 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-23-06 07:19 AM Response to Reply #36 |
71. Exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rabrrrrrr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 07:49 PM Response to Reply #24 |
39. It might not make you rick, but it would put one in the top 5% of income |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fishwax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 08:46 PM Response to Reply #24 |
51. You must be kidding. 250k puts you near the top 1% of all earners |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TroglodyteScholar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 11:14 PM Response to Reply #24 |
61. $250k/yr doesn't make you rich? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SquireJons (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 07:55 PM Response to Reply #1 |
40. What BS, I'd like to see some actual numbers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rabrrrrrr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 08:22 PM Response to Reply #40 |
46. Ah, here we are: the top 5% pay 50% of the taxes; |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rabrrrrrr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 08:27 PM Response to Reply #1 |
47. I was slightly wrong - 95% of taxes are paid by those earning >$50K |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomWV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 06:05 PM Response to Original message |
2. Easiest Argument To Counter There Is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wilms (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 06:10 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. That wouldn't prove anything. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kenny blankenship (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 06:09 PM Response to Original message |
3. If true, would only indicate how much of the wealth they've gobbled |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 06:09 PM Response to Original message |
4. Sales taxes? Property taxes? Excise taxes? Social Security taxes? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ravy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 06:31 PM Response to Reply #4 |
13. And a disproportional amount of the other taxes you listed!!! (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JAYJDF (322 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 06:10 PM Response to Original message |
5. Apples. If he has 7 apples and taxes takes away one, he goes without |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 06:58 PM Response to Reply #5 |
18. Ding ding ding Winner! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueJac (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 06:10 PM Response to Original message |
7. Don't worry......... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 06:19 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. This is what "What's the Matter with Kansas?" is about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 07:02 PM Response to Reply #8 |
19. Nope when it is this ingrained, it has been inculcated by family. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nicole (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 06:25 PM Response to Original message |
10. $100K per annum is not rich |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Midlodemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 06:27 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. No it isn't. In some areas, it is a liveable wage. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-23-06 07:02 AM Response to Reply #11 |
70. If you get out of Manhattan you can.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stargazer99 (943 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 07:20 PM Response to Reply #10 |
28. I would love to suffer so badly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nicole (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 07:48 PM Response to Reply #28 |
38. I didn't say they were suffering, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fujiyama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 10:44 PM Response to Reply #38 |
59. They're not just "better off than many" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nicole (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-23-06 03:32 AM Response to Reply #59 |
66. That would depend on where they lived |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SquireJons (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 08:05 PM Response to Reply #10 |
44. OK, that's income tax |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FogerRox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 06:30 PM Response to Original message |
12. The top personal income tax rate used to be 92% thru to about 1961 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
taught_me_patience (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 06:51 PM Response to Original message |
14. But the rich own 99% of the wealth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 07:03 PM Response to Reply #14 |
20. A little high there, more like 65% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
taught_me_patience (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-23-06 01:16 AM Response to Reply #20 |
63. not talking about the top 1% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jackpine Radical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 06:54 PM Response to Original message |
15. If this statement is true, it is probably only true for income tax. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 07:06 PM Response to Reply #15 |
23. Robbery with pencils! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RB TexLa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 06:55 PM Response to Original message |
16. first, I bet you would be hard pressed to find anyone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fujiyama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 10:39 PM Response to Reply #16 |
58. My guess is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 06:56 PM Response to Original message |
17. Then the IRS wouldn't be concerned about the pittance we submit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FUGW (237 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 07:06 PM Response to Original message |
22. Just tell him to vote Rep. and they will see to it that he will ease |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 07:08 PM Response to Reply #22 |
25. What do you suppose his chances are statistically of becoming |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kat45 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 08:36 PM Response to Reply #22 |
48. Sadly, a lot of folks DO think that someday they will be rich, and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 07:21 PM Response to Original message |
29. $200,000 = $120,000 vs. $20,000 = $18,000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SammyWinstonJack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 07:23 PM Response to Original message |
31. Delusional? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JAYJDF (322 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 07:28 PM Response to Original message |
32. Is this mind slavery? I mean geez, the working poor worried |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JAYJDF (322 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 07:29 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. Oh oh, PS, this dude is probably making minimum wage and is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SammyWinstonJack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 08:03 PM Response to Reply #33 |
43. Of course he is! The moran! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SammyWinstonJack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 07:30 PM Response to Reply #32 |
34. Brainwashing big time! Delusional at best. Envy plays a big part. Greed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grannylib (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 07:30 PM Response to Original message |
35. Income tax, maybe...factor in payroll taxes, sales tax, state/local tax |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SammyWinstonJack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 07:58 PM Response to Reply #35 |
42. All the red state morans hear, is Fed taxes and in some cases, states |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grannylib (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 08:08 PM Response to Reply #42 |
45. Yeah, unfortunately... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pitohui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 07:48 PM Response to Original message |
37. this is easily countered |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 07:56 PM Response to Reply #37 |
41. He didn't invent it on the spot. It's a common right wing talking point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pitohui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 11:19 PM Response to Reply #41 |
62. let him prove he didn't just make it up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSdemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 08:37 PM Response to Original message |
49. Even if true, they still seem to be do rather well don't they? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoPasaran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 08:40 PM Response to Original message |
50. And the problem with that is??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
novalib (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 08:47 PM Response to Reply #50 |
52. The Problem With That Is THIS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
idgiehkt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 08:48 PM Response to Original message |
53. "but it got too complicated for him." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DiverDave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 09:02 PM Response to Original message |
54. I made 1100 last week |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MODemocrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 09:56 PM Response to Original message |
55. We should be so lucky to have such a huge income |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WHAT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 10:02 PM Response to Original message |
56. Well, they should move to better climates... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kenny blankenship (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 10:05 PM Response to Original message |
57. Would he be happier if the lower 95% paid 95% of the taxes and the top 5 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-22-06 10:50 PM Response to Original message |
60. I like to agree with them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-23-06 01:30 AM Response to Original message |
64. They also hold 95% of the wealth. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
radwriter0555 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-23-06 02:12 AM Response to Original message |
65. Why is that a bad thing? It's a GOOD thing when the tax burden is being |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-23-06 06:22 AM Response to Original message |
67. Did you happen to ask why he wasn't in Iraq? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blogslut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-23-06 06:38 AM Response to Reply #67 |
68. lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JAYJDF (322 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-23-06 02:56 PM Response to Reply #67 |
73. oh man, wish I thought of that. And don't forget to tell him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
B Calm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-23-06 06:53 AM Response to Original message |
69. You'd think they could afford to pay the remaining 5% too, (after |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 07th 2024, 04:14 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC