Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Billionaire Scion Tom Friedman.......The "World is NOT Flat for HIM!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 05:46 PM
Original message
Billionaire Scion Tom Friedman.......The "World is NOT Flat for HIM!
Edited on Mon Jul-31-06 05:49 PM by KoKo01
Billionaire Scion Tom Friedman/ SIROTA BLOG

I’ve documented repeatedly how New York Times columnist Tom Friedman parrots the propaganda of Big Money, using his column to legitimize some of the worst, most working-class-persecuting policies this country has seen in the last century - all while bragging on television that he doesn’t even bother read the details of the policies he advocates for. I have always believed Friedman’s perspective comes from the bubble he lives in - that is, I have always believed he feels totally at ease shilling for Big Money and attacking workers because from the comfortable confines of the Washington suburbs he lives in and the elite cocktail parties he attends, what Friedman says seems mainstream to him. But I never had any idea how dead on I was about the specific circumstances of Friedman’s bubble - and how it potentially explains a lot more than I ever thought.

As the July edition of the Washingtonian Magazine notes, Friedman lives in "a palatial 11,400-square-foot house, now valued at $9.3 million, on a 7½-acre parcel just blocks from I-495 and Bethesda Country Club." He "married into one of the 100 richest families in the country" - the Bucksbaums, whose real-estate Empire is valued at $2.7 billion.

Let’s be clear - I’m a capitalist, so I have no problem with people doing well or living well, even Tom Friedman. That said, this does potentially explain an ENORMOUS amount about Friedman’s perspective. Far from the objective, regular-guy interpreter of globalization that the D.C. media portrays him to be, Friedman is a member of the elite of the economic elite on the planet Earth. In fact, he’s married into such a giant fortune, it’s probably more relevant to refer to him as Billionaire Scion Tom Friedman than columnist Tom Friedman, both because that’s more descriptive of what he represents, and more important for readers of his work to know so that they know a bit about where he’s coming from.

Mind you, I don’t think everyone needs to publish their net worth. But Friedman’s not everyone. He’s not just "doing pretty well" and is not just any old columnist. He’s not just a millionaire or a multimillionaire - he’s member of one of the wealthiest families in the world, and is one of the most influential media voices on the planet, who writes specifically about economic/class issues. If politicians are forced to disclose every last asset they own, you’d think at the very least, the New York Times - in the interest of basic disclosure - should have a tagline under Friedman’s economic columns that says "Tom Friedman is an heir to a multi-billion-dollar business empire."

More about how the "Wealthy live" who REPORT OUR NEWS and write BOOKS and DESTROY DEMOCRACY}...here at...

http://www.davidsirota.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Demit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. If he's only married into the fortune, that doesn't make him a scion.
Nor is there any evidence from Sirota's piece that he is even an heir. Admittedly I read it fast, and I certainly am no fan of Tom Friedman, but having just observed Sirota's making a mistake in reading a NYT story detail then going off on a (wrong) riff about it, I have to question his data on this one. I hate being given false info--there's enough that's bad out there without getting stuff wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Ain't it Great Though...that Friedman has so much money to Travel....
and write books about how "since the world is flat" we Americans should "accept lower wages" so that the "emerging Third World" will feel "comfortable."

So...forget GM Salaries/Union Salaries that gave American's a "living wage" or "above" and that allowed our kids to go on and get higher education.

Friedman speaks from his 11,700 square foot house that rivals FDR and Rockefeller times of the "GILDED AGE" and expects us to think whatever he says isn't BULL CRAP from the "Folks on the Mountains" telling the "Flood Zone" how to accept their "lot in life?"

You see NO PROBLEM with this...Fiedman's Lifestyle? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 06:21 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. I believe I explained the problem I see in my post. Don't be antagonistic.
I said I was no fan of Friedman's--and that's based on his writing and his ideas. They are bullshit without even knowing what his lifestyle is.

My problem is with Sirota's sloppiness. It undermines his credibility as a reporter of facts.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. I love that Friedman the "darling of Middle and Right....is EXPOSED
living in a house that's SO BIG FOR HIM...one wonders if the built in "intercom" can allow him to talk to his wife and kids?

FAT CAT FRIEDMAN who wan't ALL OUR WAGES HERE IN AMERICA TO BE FLAT...just so he can write books while his RICH WIFE CUCKOLDS HIM!!!

HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA! the HYPOCRACY OF THAT JERK.

Let's move on to both Russer and Matthews and their "GE PROVIDED" MANSIONS on Nantucket...shall we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. dupe....looky here
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x1779534

let me say once more how much I LOATHE that bloated little bindlestick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. Tom = market fetishist.
Edited on Mon Jul-31-06 07:38 PM by Odin2005
The Free Market Fundies worship the Almighty Free Market so devoutly it's rediculous. I was listening to BBC Radio on the internet and the story on the collapse of the Doha talks was one big Free Trade circle jerk (that isn't suprising, the UK has historically worshiped free trade more then any other nation), one economist takling to the anchorman sounded like he was saying that the collapse of free trade that resulted from the aftermath of WW1 caused WW2 and that free trade fostors world peace. How deluded can these people get? :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I wish I could find that great article posted about how collapse of talks
was a "good thing." It was an article talking about how WTO not getting
DOHA approved was a relief for all the people of the world who thought that the WTO's idea of "Free Trade" was huring them economically.

I'll look for it..but don't have time to do it tonight. It was one of the most uplifiting articles I've read recently and for DU'ers who have "populists" for the "little person" sympathies it would make you smile.

Who cares what the BBC and Bush and Blair and the rest think. It was a win for those who've been picketing the WTO for years!

Now, if we can just pick ourselves up by our "bootstraps" and throw off the "Think Tanks" and "Globalists" who think they know better than "We the People" we might have a start to remaking a better world. At least it's a goal to work for since we know who screwed things up in "warp speed" and don't have to wait years to read about it in the history books too late to do anything about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC