http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/MoveOns_clout_threatens_Democratic_centrists_0801.htmlText with my comments interjected in ( ):
The clout of the online Democratic activist organization MoveOn.org, visible in the campaign of Ned Lamont to seize the Democratic nomination to the Senate for Connecticut, is provoking conflict with key members of the Democratic leadership, according to a report in today's Wall Street Journal.
A front-page story in the Journal illustrates how MoveOn -- with a budget of millions of dollars and a large membership base -- has advanced itself as a player in Democratic party politics. The article makes the case that the organization's support has been critical to the success so far of the Lamont campaign in launching an insurgency against a major Democratic senator, remarking that MoveOn's endorsement of Lamont "injected cash and volunteers into the antiwar candidate's crusade to unseat one of the staunchest Democratic supporters of the Iraq war."
But other Democrats fear that MoveOn's activities could harm the party as a whole. Party leaders fear that a leftward movement, concentrated heavily on Iraq, "would imperil moderate and conservative Democrats whose appeal in Western and Southern states is critical to winning back Congress. It could also alienate swing voters, who polls suggest are shifting back to the Democrats this year. Says moderate Louisiana Democrat Sen. Mary Landrieu, who supports Mr. Lieberman, 'I don't think it's a winning strategy or a smart strategy.'"
(First of all, screw Landrieu who sold us out on the Alito Supreme Court nomination by refusing to support Kerry's filibuster. Alito has turned out to be every bit as horrific as he was foreseen to be...I use the Alito nomination as a gauge to who is a true democrat and who is not. Those who stepped forward to support the filibuster fought for the long stated policy that the dems would oppose ANY nominee that threatened Roe V Wade. But, I digress....
Let's read the second part, again - important because it is pure cow poop.
"But other Democrats fear that MoveOn's activities could harm the party as a whole. Party leaders fear that a leftward movement, concentrated heavily on Iraq, "would imperil moderate and conservative Democrats whose appeal in Western and Southern states is critical to winning back Congress"
Leftist movement concentrating on Iraq? Imperil moderate & conservative democrats? WHAT THE *&^&? Do they not read the polls??? The MAJORITY of Americans don't approve of the war in Iraq and want the troops OUT. That is NOT a leftist position. It is a sane position that the DINOS fear because they have propped up Bush's insane Iraq policy. They do not want to deal with the political repercussions of their acquiescence to a unethical, strategically stupid, and financially disastrous war. A war they ALL should have oppossed in the first place!
I am fed up to high heaven with thoughtful, intelligent, informed citizens being portrayed as the far left, EVEN BY OUR OWN PARTY. We were RIGHT about Iraq. We are RIGHT about global warming. The so-called 'far left' are the most educated, informed, thoughtful, and responsible members of American society. And, the democrats would do well to embrace rather then run from us because we represent all of the TRUE values of the old democratic party. The one that truly fought for and cared about all the people.
The so-called 'centrists' of the democratic party have destroyed the once proud party of the people by attempting to be Republican lite. It they hadn't noticed, their strategy is NOT working....Let's continue with the article...)
This tug of war is similar to a push by conservative Republicans in the early 1990s to take over the party structure and elevate such social issues as abortion. That intraparty feud contributed to the re-election defeat of President George H. W. Bush in 1992 but helped fuel the conservative Republican takeover of Congress two years later.
(HOW INSULTING to compare the progressive communities efforts to restore sanity to the democratic party to the efforts of the neo-conservatives...And, the 'conservative' Republican take-over of Congress...I guess so, if conservative means fiscally reckless, scientifically ignorant, big government promoting religious extremists...back to the text)
The Connecticut showdown comes at a time when the Democratic Party is struggling to reposition itself after successive presidential-election losses. For all its momentum, MoveOn hasn't scored a major victory, despite its rapid mobilization of people and money around the world. Its members backed 2004 Democratic presidential contender Howard Dean, who lost in early primaries. It rallied behind the Ohio Senate candidacy of Democrat Paul Hackett, an antiwar Iraq veteran, who in February angrily quit the primary under pressure from party leaders anxious to clear the way for Rep. Sherrod Brown. And this summer MoveOn made voter-turnout calls for Democrat Francine Busby, who lost a high-profile House special election to replace convicted Republican Rep. Randy "Duke" Cunningham in San Diego.
A Lamont loss would take the edge off threats by MoveOn and online activists to punish candidates who defy the party's so-called "netroots." But a successful challenge to Mr. Lieberman could embolden an energetic and left-leaning wing of the Democratic party, which for the first time this year is weighing into congressional primary races.
(Oh. I see. Holding democrats who do not represent the people's interest is now punishment. It was once called responsible citizenry and political accountability).
"This puts the political class on notice that they have to pay attention to people outside the Beltway," says Eli Pariser, MoveOn's 25-year-old executive director.
(This last statement is okay, but fails to address that people IN the belt-way are against this war and agree with most of the so-called 'far left' positions.
INSANE.