Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I have a German friend who's married to an Israeli. We talked about

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 09:22 PM
Original message
I have a German friend who's married to an Israeli. We talked about
the Middle East situation a couple of years ago when she was here on a visit, and came to the agreement that the answer was this:

The US should take 50% of the money it sends to Israel for military stuff, and use the other 50% to build factories in Palestinian areas (West Bank, Gaza). Making basic stuff that gets bought frequently: Paper towels, rubber gloves, dishwashing soap, brooms windshield wipers, and so on. Maybe mp3 players, too.

Short shipping distances should make their stuff price-competitive in Israel.

After ten years of this kid of trade, no more wars.

After all, you don't go to war against people you do business with, generally. The Israelis would be reluctant to blow up factories that make the stuff they buy, and on the Palestinian side, if Cousin Ahmed is getting ready to do a suicide bombing, his family will alert the cops, because they can't make any money from blown-up customers.

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. That must be the sanest thing I've heard in 20 years.
If I were old enough to remember that. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. Hey, I can''t remember yesterday, but I remember that conversation,
so we must have come to a conclusion that makes sense.

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
evlbstrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. We bought oil from Iraq.
And yet, we blew it up.
Apples to oranges in some respects. But it exposes the flaw in the premise. At least when one side is psychotic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. I agree with that
You'd think a political party that wraps itself in commerce and prides itself in self-sufficiency would get the basic common sense in homegrown economies. But no, they're so accustomed to corporate subsidies that they can't think of any other way to exist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. That is a really good idea
Spend the money on positive stuff, helping people get what they need, make what they need. Improve living conditions for all, involve all sides in it. Very good idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ravenseye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. I've been saying that for awhile
In numerous posts here too...

If someone has a good job, a healthy family, and a happy life, they don't strap explosives to their chest or shoot rockets randomly into a neighboring country.

It's in Israel's best interests to economically develop Palestine and Lebanon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. No, it's in OUR interest to develop Palestine and Lebanon. We have
the money; Israel doesn't.

Sthe $250 million a DAY we're pissing away in Iraq would build a LOT of factories and schools.

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enough Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. So sane, so humane, so simple.
Only one problem here -- no money for the war industry. What a beautiful dream.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy M Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
7. If only it would happen. It seems so logical that it makes you....
wonder why something like that wasn't done long ago. What a great way to spend the billions now spent on death and destruction. I truly believe there could be peaceful solutions. Unfortunately, the black gold in the Middle East will prevent the US from wanting the solution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. That's the problem. It's too simple. Bureaucrats don't get paid for
Edited on Tue Aug-01-06 09:50 PM by Redstone
carrying out simple, effective plans. Do they?

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy M Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. No they don't. They're always afraid we won't need them...
anymore. That's why they sit around making up some of the ridiculous laws they come up with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. And then the procedures for complying with those laws...
Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
8. I love it!
In fact, I wish the U.S. would stop ALL military aid to everybody, especially military aid to Third World countries that can't feed their people.

Military aid is a sick legacy of the Cold War, when both the U.S. and the USSR were arming their respective allies for proxy wars, and yet this military aid was too often used by these countries to repress their own people instead of to fight any external enemy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. No, the reality is that we'd still have to give Israel the 50% for a while
until the economic relationship was up and running. Then we could phase it out.

Just reality.

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
10. While I agree with your sentiment and back when I used to
vote republican, (pre 1980) I thought, loudly, the same thing, the benefit of experience has made a mockery of such simplicity.
The existence of a valued trade partner might stay the hand of some local warlord, but there is no record of it's having prevented any wars.
Moreover, the sad fact is that global gluttony is at such a fevered pitch and competitors are so anxious to usurp local supply lines that there are records of wars started and carried on with the specific purpose of quelling both global and local competitors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. I do hope your screen name doesn't denote what I think it does.
Please tell me it doesn't.

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. What would that be?
Eastern Standard Time?
ESTablished?
Energy Saving Trust?

I don't have a dog in this fight, of course, but I was just wondering what you think it means. If you don't want to say it aloud, you can IM me.

Seriously, I'm at a loss.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. EST, as in "Werner Erhard's" thing. Though I think that was actually
supposed to be lowercase "est." I don't remember precisely.

I went to high school with "Werner Erhard."

So, is that what it is, or is it something else? Just curious.

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. I can't answer for that person, but, yes, Werner Erhard's thing
was lower case.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. It was lowercase, and utter bullshit. I went to high school with
Mr "Erhard."

That's not his real name, of course.

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adriennui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
19. a good, practical idea
when countries are intertwined economically they have to get along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC