|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
sarcasmo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-19-06 02:26 PM Original message |
No more legacy Presidents. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sammy Pepys (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-19-06 02:28 PM Response to Original message |
1. An amendment against legacy Presidents? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jawja (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-19-06 03:00 PM Response to Reply #1 |
19. Absolutely. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
toymachines (782 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-19-06 02:30 PM Response to Original message |
2. Grassroots Prez |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YOY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-19-06 02:30 PM Response to Original message |
3. as much as I love the idea (and I really love the idea) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sarcasmo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-19-06 02:35 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. With the Democrats controlling all three branches in 08. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YOY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-19-06 02:40 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. So what if some guy who happens to be a descendant of James Polk |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sarcasmo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-19-06 02:42 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. If you don't stop Legacy's do we get Jeb and then some drunk offspring |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YOY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-19-06 02:48 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. They're supposed to stop themselves in reality. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sarcasmo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-19-06 03:13 PM Response to Reply #15 |
22. Wasn't the current President a DRUNK at one time in his life? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YOY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-19-06 03:50 PM Response to Reply #22 |
26. Not while his family was under a microscope n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BOSSHOG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-19-06 02:32 PM Response to Original message |
4. What if Chelsea Clinton turns out to be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-19-06 02:35 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. What if power never leaves the hands of a small group of families |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sarcasmo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-19-06 02:36 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Thanks for making my point JVS. It's to much like a family Dictatorship. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BOSSHOG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-19-06 02:43 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. No one is prevented from seeking public office |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-19-06 02:52 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. But you can't be President because you didn't go to Yale is a defacto... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BOSSHOG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-19-06 02:58 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. I don't understand |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-19-06 04:10 PM Response to Reply #17 |
27. and you base this Yale requirement on the fact that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-19-06 05:39 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. 2004 had no non-Yale candidate leading at any time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-19-06 06:32 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. what about Edwards, Clark, Gephardt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-20-06 03:33 AM Response to Reply #31 |
32. If they were polling higher than Dean, I'd suspect that was when Kerry... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-19-06 02:34 PM Response to Original message |
5. AMEN |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warpy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-19-06 02:35 PM Response to Original message |
8. Oh, I'd like a couple of amendments |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sammy Pepys (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-19-06 02:44 PM Response to Reply #8 |
14. Heheh...well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warpy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-19-06 05:00 PM Response to Reply #14 |
28. First, this is my fantasy, so stop pooping on my parade |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WI_DEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-19-06 02:41 PM Response to Original message |
11. Some feel RFK would have been better than JFK and that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ck4829 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-19-06 02:49 PM Response to Original message |
16. Just say "NO!" to Dynasties! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-19-06 03:02 PM Response to Original message |
20. No FDR? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sarcasmo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-19-06 03:09 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. No relations period. The Legacy thing has to end with this current IDIOT. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-19-06 03:44 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. wow... a lot of vacancies.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sarcasmo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-20-06 11:12 AM Response to Reply #24 |
34. If you think about the insanity of the legacy is should include Governors. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xithras (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-19-06 03:15 PM Response to Original message |
23. How do you define legacy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leetrisck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-19-06 03:45 PM Response to Original message |
25. Does legacy really mean husband or wife |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sarcasmo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-20-06 11:12 AM Response to Reply #25 |
35. Rich is not the issue legacy is the issue and another Clinton would be a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Initech (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-19-06 05:42 PM Response to Original message |
30. I hear that! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KitchenWitch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-20-06 03:37 AM Response to Original message |
33. Until we get true campaign finance reform... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:17 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC