Does "fringe" vs "moderate" imply a population distribution curve?
Edited on Wed Aug-09-06 12:08 PM by wuushew
I believe that the term fringe is another metaphor for describing a small segment of a larger population. Despite education it is human nature to avoid appearing the odd man out in social groups.
A fringe might be 1 out of 10 or one out of a 100. I suppose statistically anything less than 5% or more than 3 standard deviations from the mean might be considered a valid description of a statistically non-mainstream view.
But since leftist thought is by nature the one that represents the the largest number of people especially in economic matters how can a party of the left ever be out of step with the larger population?
Does Amerika attempt to balance political representation between to strains of supposedly equal ideologically or do voters wish numerically accurate representation?
Politicians appear to imply the former while saying the latter since anti-war sentiment is massively prevalent in the general voting population.
Is it all bullshit and semantics or can the term be pinned down without becoming derogitory?
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.