Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

IT WAS NOT SCOTLAND YARD

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
BooScout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-10-06 09:40 AM
Original message
IT WAS NOT SCOTLAND YARD
Edited on Thu Aug-10-06 10:36 AM by BooScout
....That foiled the alledged terror attack. They were merely acting on information supplied to them by MI5 which is under the Authority of the Home Secretary John Reid.

Please get your facts straight before screaming at everyone else that they are wrong.

That is all...please return to churning out those Theories Du Jour.:tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-10-06 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. Roger that. Over and out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-10-06 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
2. Link?
Or is this part of your campaign for John Reid to be promoted to Lord Protector ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BooScout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-10-06 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. Muriel.............have you been taking my theories seriously again?
John Reid himself said it was a joint operation this morning on the news.

http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/s/220/220304_terror_plot_to_blow_up_planes_foiled.html

"...The Metropolitan Police and MI5 had mounted an undercover operation going back months. They decided to act today because they believed there was an immediate risk of attack, with several planes to the United States under threat...."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-10-06 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. No, no exactly seriously
:D which is why I wanted to know if you wanted this one taken seriously. MI5 is involved in this in some way, but that doesn't mean the police were "merely acting on information supplied to them by MI5". The police are capable of doing surveillance themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BooScout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-10-06 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Yes but in this instance they weren't....
MI5 was involved. That doesn't mean anything mind you.....BTW.....I am trying not to take anything too seriously these days. It makes my head hurt when I do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-10-06 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
3. No it wasn't.
"Liquid, you say?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emcguffie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-10-06 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. Just look at that resolution. Do we do that nowadays? NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xenotime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-10-06 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
4. Doesn't James Bond work for MI5?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-10-06 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. MI6 (and occasionally, the fictional MI7) (NT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-10-06 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. MI3


Now we're safe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-10-06 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
6. I thought the MI5 was that highway out of london
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BooScout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-10-06 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. No that's the M4
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norrin Radd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-10-06 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. How about an M25?
Orbital party?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BooScout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-10-06 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Meet me on the Magic Roundabout
Make sure to close your eyes once you enter.:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norrin Radd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-10-06 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. I'm mad chuffed for that! n/t
Edited on Thu Aug-10-06 08:18 PM by Progs Rock
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC