So far nobody in the press is asking what role did the "infiltrator"

play in devising the "terror plot".

With a few notable exceptions it is the stenography corp.

A real plot, or an agent provacateur?

I would have to assume.

9 of the 911 hijackers remain unidentified to this day... I've come to realize that most likely these were the infiltrators we commonly see in all the terror plots - both real and fake -- that have surfaced over the past 5 years.

I'm sure this is why we still don't know who those 9 people were. The infiltrators have constistently become the ringleaders in all these wild schemes.

Epiphane time.

NT

the 'government'.

We don't know who those 9 people were... not one single clue and all inquiry as to who they were has been resolutely pushed aside. So, with a critical thought, you have to wonder and ask why.

9 people, completely unaccounted for, involved in the worst mass murder or terrorist attack ever made against a developed nation, and no one wants to know precisely who all the perpetrators were? That makes no sense.

When people are killed in a murder in a house in a neighborhood, no stone is left unturned to track down the perpetrators, find out who those specific people were, and what their motive was.

And no one ever took credit or made any statement about why that deed was done. (No, bin laden didn't take credit, he stated that he knew about 911 but didn't take part. Bin Laden has always taken credit for his deeds)

can you link me to information about the "unaccounted for 9". Obviously I've missed something important.

Thanks.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1559151.stm

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&rls=DVXA%2CDVXA%3A2006-01%2CDVXA%3Aen&q=hijackers+alive

Keep in mind that 5 years later, almost all the media stories have long been archived. I had several from CNN in my cache for years, but they're now gone. Sites like whatreallyhappened.com still have them archived, and it's a good site.

You should read for yourself and make up your own mind. A lot of stuff out there is wild tin foil hat stuff, but it's all based on reality.

...devoted to go on a mission in which they were guaranteed to die if it succeeded.

and all the more reason to get agents in there if the stakes are that high.

weapons?

When MI5 says they have an "agent" inside, it's cover for electronic surveillance.

When MI5 says they have "surveillance intelligence", it's cover for an actual agent.

For obvious reasons they don't want to publicize the actual means of methods. We may never find out, it's against the law in Britain to release or leak state secrets, and it will land you in jail, even after you have left the government.