Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ruling Against Wiretaps Further Sharpens Partisan Divide

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-18-06 09:06 PM
Original message
Ruling Against Wiretaps Further Sharpens Partisan Divide
(snip)
The National Republican Senatorial Committee challenged Democratic candidates to "stand up in opposition to a liberal judge," while the RNC released an Internet advertisement painting the Democrats as soft on defense. The ad shows prominent Democrats decrying warrantless wiretapping, abusive interrogations, ballistic missile defense and the war in Iraq through the opening of a cave, meant to represent the vantage point of terrorists monitoring the opposition party.

"Democrats say they want to talk about national security and the war on terror . . . while terrorists are watching," the narrator intones.

With that burst of activity, Republicans appeared ready to make Taylor's decision on wiretapping the 2006 equivalent of a Massachusetts judge's legalization of same-sex marriage in 2004: a rallying cry for the Republican base.

"They never miss an opportunity to play divisive politics on national security," said Rep. Rahm Emanuel (Ill.), chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. "The one casualty Americans would accept in the war on terror is partisanship, and that's the one thing George Bush won't give up."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/18/AR2006081800109.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-18-06 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. The title of this article is exactly why so many approve of it.
The ruling was against WARRANTLESS wiretapping, not wiretapping.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-18-06 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Excactly "WARRANTLESS wiretapping"
I remember polls on the MSM where they left that part out

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-18-06 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. It's in the first paragraph of his article.
but looks like he conveniently left it out of the title. I sent him an email

A federal judge's ruling that the National Security Agency's warrantless wiretapping is unconstitutional set off a flurry of political responses yesterday, as Republicans tried to keep control of the national security debate amid signs that their own party's ranks may be breaking under the pressure of the Iraq war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-18-06 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. Dems need to come out swinging on this
Make it clear that Democrats support the Constitution. Democrats support the rule of law. Democrats support wiretaps with warrants. Democrats support all things that enable democracy to thrive and survive.

Republicans don't support the Constitution. Republicans ignore any and all laws that are "inconvenient". Republicans believe the government has the right to spy on all citizens without warrants or cause. Republicans support tactics that were used by Hitler and Stalin.

Who are the real patriots?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rubberducky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-18-06 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Agreed!!!
If the dems don`t come out swinging, that`s when they will be seen as weak. Just keep cavin` to the repugs, and we will be sunk. No need to wonder why. The repugs will continue diggin the graves will the dems just keep waiting to be thrown in?? If the dems don`t get a good strong voice out there the party is over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-18-06 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. cause the dumb mtf jerks that support this dweeb want a king..
they somehow missed the history class that explains how this country was formed and for what reason it was formed..they missed the class on getting rid of a ruling king!

and Rahm..get you head out of your ass and confront these mtfers!

come on Rahm..stand up and be counted..and stand up for our constitution..get out of your closet and raise holy hell!

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC