Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"The media is not doing it's job"?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
salinen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 08:01 PM
Original message
"The media is not doing it's job"?
Yes they are. They have been hired by their corporate bosses to say what they've been told to say. The idea that they've been lax or lazy or afraid or unwilling to look partisan is pure stench. The entire world is up-to-date on the who these fascists are. Some Air America hosts say it, And it's true. But the corporotists want their version spread, and it's a lie. We, the lone defenders of the constitution, should consider the "media" similar to how the Iraqi's view the occupation. Enemies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. A group including Amy Goodman is trying to start
Edited on Sat Aug-26-06 08:09 PM by Eric J in MN
...a TV channel called "The Real News" which is based on individual donations instead of ads.

They are looking for hosts, people to appear on-camera.

If you know someone charismatic with journalism experience, send him or her the following:

http://www.iwtnews.com/node/3032


YOU COULD BE A HOST OF THE REAL NEWS!

We are conducting a global search for three on-camera news anchors for a pilot of our future news program, taping in November 2006.

We’re looking for exciting individuals who won’t take spin for an answer and who combine wit with substance.

Successful candidates have:

· Solid journalism experience (or equivalent)
· Proven interviewing abilities
· On-screen presentation skills
· A passion for seeking facts and pursuing truth

The Real News will be the flagship show of IWT, a non-profit world news service available on TV and the Internet. Our objective is uncompromising journalism, with no corporate or government funding and no commercial advertising.

The hosts of The Real News will be the face of this international network and reflect its values. They will represent, in age and background, the diversity of the real world.

To Apply

We require the following application materials:

- A cover letter telling us about yourself and why you think you would be a good host for The Real News.

- An up-to-date CV that includes your name, address, phone # and email.

- A short (1-2 minute) video demo of yourself that shows how well you write and present. This can be a personal editorial or news story (the kind of story you think should be on The Real News). Get creative!

- A demo of your other on-camera work

DEADLINE IS SEPTEMBER 15TH, 2006 (But we’re already looking at DVDs)

Send all materials via mail to:

The Real News
P.O. Box 53, Station B
Toronto, Ont.
M5T 2T2

Any questions, contact us at host@therealnews.com






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salinen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. How exciting
thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. They need a better name
marketing is important. Sex up the name a bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. They were originally called "Independent World Television."
Do you like the original name better than "The Real News"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-27-06 06:08 AM
Response to Reply #12
26. "The Real News is IWT's flagship show"
http://www.iwtnews.com/

The channel is still called Independent World Television.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-27-06 06:09 AM
Response to Reply #5
27. Title it "FREE SEX with a little news on the side"
Marketing, the underhanded study of how to play up to peoples base desires
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. Thanks for this. I just forwarded it to someone
who might be interested.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Bacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. How much are YOU willing to contribute for independent news?
Millions of people giving $25 to start an independent network up? I think that idea is FABULOUS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. I donated to "The Real News" before we got close to the election, and
Edited on Sat Aug-26-06 09:03 PM by Eric J in MN
...I'll donate again after the election, but right now I just want to donate to Democratic candidates like Patty Wetterling, who is in a close US House race in Minnesota:
http://www.pattywetterling.com


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Bacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-27-06 01:39 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. Understood!
I donated to them too, and just sent some $$ to Casey, Webb, Carter, Sherrod Brown and Ned
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. "journalists are not doing their jobs"
I believe the quote is inaccurate english, and that the real concern is that
news has become information without constructing a context, as lazy journalists
and ignorant editors let fly a misinformation media that lies through omission,
where derelict journalists do not report the truth, but rather PR for ratings.

THe ethics of ameircan journalism are a bit wanting, indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. You won't get an argument from the VAST majority of us ...
Fluff Pieces, Distractions and Overt Propaganda on 24/7 via the Television Cable News Networks.

In fact, the smarmy promoters are shamelessly proud of the CRAP they shovel at us, plus the bubble headed news-models are beaming in their soap opera stage ... so happy that their presence serves to spread to "us little people" INFOtainment and not boring NEWS that BBC provides.

The media INSULTS the American People 24/7 with this mindless CRAP. They actually think that they are getting away with it. It worked for Iraq, but now the Average American has ZERO respect for the USA news media - lock, stock and barrel. :grr: :puke: :grr:

We are being dumbed down and the programming isn't even of half-a**ed decent quality. But that's our one true viable hope: The people of the USA turn-OFF their news and glean it from "reputable sources."

Leave it to the Media to even SUCK at distributing the "made to order" Pentagon's Propaganda.

Thanks you corporate media LOSERS, your worthless programing decisions may just come back to bite you in the pocketbook ... especially since we're not buying into your NEW prepackaged OIL WAR promotions.

Hope springs eternal! :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salinen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. They'll take the loss on the media side
to enhance the sales of war machinery on the other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Yes, but without CANNON FODDER ...
The USA Military Industrial War Machine will NOT thrive.

Wait for it. It's coming soon.

Military personnel shortages, lots of them!

I know in my heart and soul that the average American has not been convinced that "perpetual war" is a positive for either This Nation or the World. Further, the detached powers that be are about to receive a wake up call should they even CONSIDER re-implementing the draft. Future protests will make the Vietnam dust-up look like a day at the park. I honestly believe that this Perpetual War meme is about to be torn to shreds by good ole Joe and Jane AMERICAN.

Enough! It's time to stop the killing and negotiate. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. I was reading a Time in my dentist office this afternoon and there
Edited on Sat Aug-26-06 08:38 PM by Clark2008
was a letter from a, probably, Republican, but not a fundie nut, that said he actually trusted his government more than the media now.

I'm a former reporter. I was a reporter for 12 years. It's all I ever wanted to do (and still would, excepting it's not a good profession if you actually want to raise children) and that letter sent shivers down my spine.

I cannot imagine trusting any government, even a Democratic one, over the media, but, you know, when I thought about it, I know I can't trust the media, either.

How sad how far we've come from what the Framers of the Constitution wanted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salinen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. Don't you think the media
and the government are the same entity?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Seems they are now, yes.
Which makes me even more sad.

I loved my profession, but it's nothing but an eye on the orgy of the power elite and entertainment industry now.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-27-06 07:14 AM
Response to Reply #9
28. I trust a populous with enough educated persons will eventually.......
rout the malignant growth known as corporations. Before solving a problem one must figure out what the problem is. Greed eventually always loses to the plurality but sometimes it just takes longer than other times
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salinen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-28-06 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. You're cute
but wrong. Greed always wins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Speck Tater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. The media is doing their job just fine, thank you.
Our society is structured in such a way that the ONLY job of the media is to make money for the stockholders, and that's exactly what they are doing. Even if it means turning "news" into just another form of entertainment to capture eyes for the sponsers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jerry611 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
8. Back in the old days, the media protected the president
Remember how they made it so that it looks like FDR wasn't in a wheelchair?

The media also did not used to put any emphesis in civilian casulties during war. In World War 2, we carbet bombed Nazi cities. The only dead reported was how many Nazis we knocked off. When we dropped the nuke on Hiroshima, one newspaper the next day read, "VICTORY!!"

So no, I don't see any difference really with the media of decades ago and the media today.

It's funny too because the right wing swears up and down that the media is obviously tilted and bias towards the left. Meanwhile the left claims it is tilted and biased to the right. So by many people's standards, that is exactly where the media wants to be...hated by both sides.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. But ideally societies progress.
Something like the internment of the Japanese in the US would hopefully be unacceptable today.

Similarly, lack of reporting on civilian casualties should be unacceptable to us today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jerry611 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. But without those civilian casulties, could we win the war?
Some say that if we didn't drop the bomb, we would have had to invade Japan. Imagine the loss of life in such a battle. Millions would die.

And Hitler didn't give a damn how many civilians die.

When you deal with those kind of people as your enemy, and they have that much power, the death toll in such a war with them is going to be astronomical. And it was. In world war 2, 55 million people died around the world. More than half were civilian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Batgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #8
21. Here is some good info re: media bias
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20030224/alterman2

"In a careful 1999 study published in the academic journal Communications Research, four scholars examined the use of the "liberal media" argument and discovered a fourfold increase in the number of Americans telling pollsters that they discerned a liberal bias in their news. But a review of the media's actual ideological content, collected and coded over a twelve-year period, offered no corroboration whatever for this view. The obvious conclusion: News consumers were responding to "increasing news coverage of liberal bias media claims, which have been increasingly emanating from Republican Party candidates and officials."

>>snip<<

"In the real world of the right-wing media, the pundits are the conservatives' shock troops. Even the ones who constantly complain about alleged liberal control of the media cannot ignore the vast advantage their side enjoys when it comes to airing their views on television, in the opinion pages, on the radio and the Internet.

Take a look at the Sunday talk shows, the cable chat fests, the op-ed pages and opinion magazines, and the radio talk shows....Across virtually the entire television punditocracy, unabashed conservatives dominate, leaving lone liberals to be beaten up by gangs of marauding right-wingers, most of whom voice views much further toward their end of the spectrum than any regularly televised liberals do toward the left. Grover Norquist, the right's brilliant political organizer, explains his team's advantage by virtue of the mindset of modern conservatism. "The conservative press is self-consciously conservative and self-consciously part of the team," he notes. "The liberal press is much larger, but at the same time it sees itself as the establishment press. So it's conflicted. Sometimes it thinks it needs to be critical of both sides." Think about it. Who among the liberals can be counted upon to be as ideological, as relentless and as nakedly partisan as George Will, Robert Novak, Pat Buchanan, Bay Buchanan, William Bennett, William Kristol, Fred Barnes, John McLaughlin, Charles Krauthammer, Paul Gigot, Oliver North, Kate O'Beirne, Tony Blankley, Ann Coulter, Sean Hannity, Tony Snow, Laura Ingraham, Jonah Goldberg, William F. Buckley Jr., Bill O'Reilly, Alan Keyes, Tucker Carlson, Brit Hume, the self-described "wild men" of the Wall Street Journal editorial page, etc., etc.? In fact, it's hard to come up with a single journalist/pundit appearing on television who is even remotely as far to the left of the mainstream spectrum as most of these conservatives are to the right.

>>snip<<

As a result of their domination of the terms of political discourse, conservative assumptions have come to rule the roost of insider debate. And they do so not only because of conservative domination of the punditocracy but also because of conservative colonization of the so-called center--where all action in American politics is deemed to take place."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orpupilofnature57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
10. Which works for Kkkarl and the WWF and Karr eating caviar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salinen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. At the grocery store checkout
the mags are all crap. On the T.V., the news is now crap. Common denomenators are winning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-27-06 02:26 AM
Response to Reply #18
23. yes, the tv news traitors' BS will be replayed over and over
after this country tanks, then begins to dust itself off.

they're on "film" afterall, and we loves the pretty pictures!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-27-06 04:35 AM
Response to Original message
24. The media is not doing its job. Leave out the apostrophe.
The freepers are not the only ones guilty of bad punctuation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salinen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-28-06 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #24
30. Noted
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-27-06 05:56 AM
Response to Original message
25. After compliantly trash-talking Clinton during his presidency,
it is genuinely pathetic to see the MSM kowtowing to this assclown.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-28-06 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
31. They expect that the critical thinkers are not going to listen
to them anyways, and will most likely get the truth via the internet. So they serve a tradition that serves up corporate marketing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC