Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Forbes Article on Working Women=Bad Marriages Debunked

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 10:24 PM
Original message
Forbes Article on Working Women=Bad Marriages Debunked
AGAIN
_ _ _ _ _

Here's the aricle, posted on DU a couple days ago:

http://www.forbes.com/home/2006/08/23/Marriage-Careers-Divorce_cx_mn_land.html?partner=ninemsn

_ _ _ _ _

Here's where it's totally debunked (HOW many eons will we have to keep debunking this bullshit anyway?)

...

The newest chimera's head comes from Forbes.com, in the form of an article last week by editor Michael Noer with a headline "Don't Marry Career Women" and subtitled "How do women, careers and marriage mix? Not well, say social scientists." The article was accompanied by a slide show purporting to show the "social science" on which the piece was based.

The way this story played out tells us a lot about the workings of today's media, the Internet and the 24-hour continuous news cycle. It may also herald a major new media power source: Femalebloggers Inc.
Forbes Retreated from Story

Forbes quickly took down the slide show. The solo Noer article was repackaged as a point-counterpoint commentary with Forbes staff writer Elizabeth Corcoran. Disagreeing.

Her commentary (obviously turned around on a dime) was anecdotal. So the result was a guy taking over the commanding heights of "science" and the woman offered a flimsier personal rebuttal.

Meanwhile, Slate media critic Jack Shafer weighed in, with a story headlined "Forbes' Female Trouble. So what if career women are divorces waiting to happen?"

Shafer rightly said the original Forbes piece was largely junk and noted "the Web site entries appear to be a holding pen for crap Noer couldn't shoehorn into his overstuffed thesis."

...

Contradicting the Forbes Thesis

We have just completed a major new analysis of data from our study of dual-earner couples that was sponsored by the National Institute of Mental Health. The data, not yet published, utterly contradict the Forbes thesis that men will be unhappy if they marry career women.

Our study--which looks at men's marital happiness--finds that among dual-earner couples, as she works more, his marital quality goes up. Why so? Probably for a number of reasons.

...

One longitudinal study of 500 couples by the University of Wisconsin-Madison's Janet Hyde found that for both men and women, the highest sexual satisfaction was among couples who both worked and experienced high rewards from their jobs. A good job, it seems, is good for your sex life.

...

MUCH MORE

http://www.womensenews.org/article.cfm?aid=2869
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. Worked while wife went to school. Now she out-earns me by a brazillion $
Well, maybe not a brazillion, but she does well enough. That last paragraph in the OP's post...not going to go into detail :evilgrin: but there is a LOT of truth in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-30-06 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Heh...
...Well speaking from the women's side of it - yea, I know! It def makes a difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC