The Woman Behind the Reading List(President Bush’s English Teacher?)
By B. V. Dees
President Bush’s reported summer reading (which included “The Stranger” by Albert Camus) caused a minor stir among some Americans. The notion of a president reading existentialist novellas and “three Shakespeares” was arguably an unusual one. Nevertheless, when recently pressed further as to which were the three Shakespeare plays he had in fact read, the president confidently responded, “Julius Caesar, Romeo, and Juliet.”
Additionally, the identity of the person who assisted the president with compiling his reading list has been made public. She is Susan Taylor, an English teacher at Sam Houston High School in Plano, Texas.
We were recently able to conduct a brief interview with Ms. Taylor.
How did you come to help the president with his reading choices?I was approached by people working for the president. I was very happy to do it and, as I was not teaching summer school this term, I had the time. Why “The Stranger”?“The Stranger” is a book I assign to all my students. It also fit in very well with both of the president’s two most important ground rules: That the books assigned be neither “too long” nor “too faggy.”Looking over the list as it currently stands, it seems to be weighted toward books that are normally first read in high school, as well as towards books about baseball. Are there any special reasons for that?It’s quite refreshing that a man of the president’s age and station in life has remained down-to-earth enough to read with an open mind what some would characterize as “high school” books. Also, in fairness to the president, he attended Phillips Academy in Andover, MA (one of America’s premier boarding schools) in the early 1960s, before many of the works we think of today as staples of an American high school education became the mainstays on the syllabus that they now are. For example, “The Catcher in the Rye” was only published in 1951. However, the president has expressed an especially keen eagerness to tackle that one, particularly since he found out its protagonist is a youth dismayed by the “phoniness” of an exclusive eastern prep school from which he has just been expelled.Interesting.As for the baseball books, the president enjoys a reward after wrestling with classics like “Brave New World” or “The Old Man and the Sea.” As a teacher, I appreciate that a mix of such choices are necessary to keep up his overall enthusiasm for reading. The president has even strayed from his usual length preferences for the baseball books. He recently read a biography of Derek Jeter and didn’t once complain about its being well over 200 pages.What’s the next conquest to go on the president’s book shelf?Well, the regular school year starts again in September for me, so, unless he enrolls in one of my classes, the president will be on his own. I wish him well in whatever path he takes in life as he goes forth into adulthood.As further proof that the president has indeed been reading the large number of books he has claimed to be, Ms. Taylor provided a collection of book reports the president had written for her. The following are excerpts:
Lord of the Flies"Lord of the Flies by William Golding is the greatest book I have ever read. What it teaches us is that you have to be ready to pull yourself up by your own bootstraps and not hang around losers like Piggy the way Ralph did for too long. Ralph was at first considered the coolest guy but then everyone saw him with Piggy and that he had the wrong type of people for friends so they sided with Roger. Lord of the Flies teaches us that it is bad to wear glasses and be fat, unless you are Dick Cheney’s age when it doesn’t matter. This book is very sad, but it also makes me very glad because it shows how far we have come as a nation. Whereas if you have glasses and are fat back then, you would get a boulder rolled on top of you, but today you would just be voted off the island and not be eligible for the million dollars prize. So that is more kinder and gentler."
Brave New World"Brave New World by Aldous Huxley is the greatest book I have ever read. It teaches us that science is not good for human civilization because it makes nightmares out of reproduction and other stuff. It also shows us the 'noble savage' is noble even if the elitistical so-called elitists think they are more sophisticationed and better. In fact, the savage is better than everybody. So there. Brave New World by Aldous Huxley teaches us for example what happens in a country where stem cell research would happen. Everyone and his mother should read this book."
Frankenstein"Frankenstein by Mary Shelley is not the greatest book I have ever read. It is very disappointing. Boris Karloff’s Frankenstein is good because he talks to people on their own level, not above them, in words they can understand ('I love dead…hate living,' 'smoke good…fire bad,' etc.). This is very important. Mary Shelley makes Frankenstein seem snobby and elitistical and we do not sympathize with him. He sounds more like the faggy second mad scientist doctor with the white hair in Bride of Frankenstein. Perhaps it can be said that Mary Shelley had a tough act to follow in trying to do a book of the movie, but I say she should have known better than to mess with a classic. Karloff good…Mary Shelley bad!"
Julius Caesar"Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare is the greatest book I have ever read. It is the tragically historical play about Julius Caesar and his merry men and teaches us lessons that are as true today as they were in the days of William Shakespeare and his ancient Rome of old. 'To be or not to be' is the question and the answer for Julius Caesar is to not to be because he is killed and this is why this book is a tragedy and not a non-tragedy. It is especially tragical because Julius Caesar is killed last of all by Brutus. He could have lived through everything else but seeing Brutus of all people kill him is what makes him die because he trusted Brutus and thought Brutus would always be on his side. Then Brutus is also killed and once he is dead someone calls him, 'The Noblest Roman there was of them all,' but we are left to opine if this was not ironically sarcastic since he is dead and not alive the way a hero should be at the end."