stephanie miller will be on Tucker show today fyi

He's not on her 'future husbands list' is he?

I abhor Tucker (which isn't what I usually call him) but I might have to try to watch in anticipation of a nice smackdown.

The boys and her were trying to come up with ways to "punk" Tucker during today's show.

"bring props" as in a sign to tell Keith that she loved him! :rofl: I wish she would do that. It would be must see TV for sure.

then Jim following up, i was howling in my car this morning.

Why am I so clueless? What show or shows am I not watching that I've never heard of her?

is carried on AAR and many progressive stations across the country. You will find a link to the stream for her show on the main page of the forums, on the right. Her show airs at 9 am til noon.

Jim is the best voice guy in the world and should not be missed. Stephanie is the daughter of Goldwater's running mate, but she is very progressive and the "liberal of the family". She is very funny and sharp too.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=315x8271

Stephanie w/ a fan. :rofl:

:loveya:

I don't listen to AAR. I don't believe it's carried here in the Kansas City area and I haven't bothered to listen to it on the internet.

photo. Heard you on her show today. She should get Bob, Harvey and Cliff on to talk about the suit. Wish the Dem Party would get involved in citizen driven attempts at correction like this and CA-50.

I want Claremont County 2004 ..... every single precinct went to bush ....
including the ones that went to Gore in 2000 and some that were majority
African American too.

the Time article was pretty damn good ... however a little late

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/31/washington/31ohio.html?ex=1314676800&en=0b908a5cc6f53723&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss

Ballot stuffing & more votes then registered voters.

Conyers truth seekers and the others who wish to sweep it under the perverbial rug:

"In January 2005, the Democratic members of the House Judiciary Committee issued a report finding “massive and unprecedented voter irregularities and anomalies” in the election.

In March 2005, the Democratic National Committee issued a report that said 2 percent of the Ohio electorate, or “approximately 129,543 voters,” had intended to vote but did not do so because of long lines and other problems at polling stations.

But the report said those and other frustrated voters “would not have erased Bush’s 118,000 vote margin in the state.”"

***
The DNC Report was a disappointing whitewash without a thorough review of the affidavits and other evidence collected by Fitrakis et al, while the Conyers/House Judiciary Dem Staff did. I don't understand why the other Dems didn't support Conyers' investigation. I will say those who take the time to thoroughly look at the collected evidence (Conyers, CBC, Boxer, RFK Jr, Mike Pap, Bob Koehler, Jim Lampley, and others,) come away with a fighting attitude. The MSM and the DLC, on the other hand, are quick to dismiss the evidence without a thorough review. Why not let them have their day in court to present all the evidence-isn't that the American way?

I LOVE her!! :loveya:

:D