So the ABC crapumentry was meant to set up Clinton weeks later?

Rex

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Sep-26-06 03:58 PM
Original message

So the ABC crapumentry was meant to set up Clinton weeks later?

Was that what it was all about and why ABC was so desperate to get it aired and in the classroom? So Disney and Fox are now chums?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

aquart

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Sep-26-06 04:07 PM
Response to Original message

1. For what purpose, dear?

It was meant to absolve the Republicans and taint the Democrats. Clinton is merely collateral damage.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Rex

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Sep-26-06 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #1

8. For the purpose of trying to focus blame for 911 on Clinton and

not on Bush.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

NVMojo

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Sep-26-06 04:09 PM
Response to Original message

2. It seems like a Rovian tactic/plan

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

applegrove

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Sep-26-06 04:14 PM
Response to Original message

3. I actually saw the Disney Movie Pirates. Which was very critical about

Edited on Tue Sep-26-06 04:15 PM by applegrove

corporations (Trading co. in the middle of the last millenium). Makes you wonder even more. If Disney did Pirates II... which made corporations evil & then does this "path to 9.11".
Makes one think there is no agenda at all with the corporation..just with the producers of the films. In which case polarized country makes for polarized products from corporations. That cannot be good?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

The Deacon

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Sep-26-06 04:15 PM
Response to Original message

4. It Was A Serious Artistic Endeavor By One Of Our Best

Young scriptwriters - the fact it appeared just months before the election & on ABC (All Bush's Cronies) Network was totally coincidental.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Wilber_Stool

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Sep-26-06 04:17 PM
Response to Original message

5. My guess is that

the movie would slam his administration and then fox would offer him time and he would be all contrite and apologetic.
Who would have thought, as I said earlier, that if you poke a Big Dawg with a stick and then let him out of his cage, he would bite you on the ass.
It wasn�t a very good plan.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Rex

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Sep-26-06 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #5

12. Has me wondering; all the kool-aid drinking by the Big Dog lately

some sort of ruse, to sucker in someone like Fox. So he could unload like he did. People often forget Clinton is a Rhodes Scholar. Unlike Bush's Ivy MBA, I hear you have to EARN the title of Rhodes Scholar.

Hats off to our last officially elected President Bill Clinton! :toast:

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

SammyWinstonJack

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Sep-26-06 04:21 PM
Response to Original message

6. If so, looks like it backfired on them. I really think that Clinton got

the better of Wallace and faux nooze, hence all the spin currently going on. Just my humble opinion.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

AZBlue

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Sep-26-06 04:22 PM
Response to Original message

7. I doubt that was the plan. Wallace just took advantage of the opportunity

eom

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Rex

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Sep-26-06 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #7

9. But it would make sense. We all know that the PNAC crowd likes to

Edited on Tue Sep-26-06 04:31 PM by Rex

plan things well in advance. I think it is Bush who throws a monkeywrench in their plans, because of his huge failure rate.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

originalpckelly

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Sep-26-06 04:32 PM
Response to Original message

10. It was the October suprise...

a few weeks early.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Rex

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Sep-26-06 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #10

11. I wonder what stage III is for the October Surprise.

Too bad for them, Clinton didn't play their game! HAHA! Big Dog didn't just get his nickname for no reason.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

SoCalDem

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Sep-26-06 04:42 PM
Response to Original message

13. Yeppers.. It was to revive the anti-Clinton rhetoric.. It's a Trifecta

1. shifts the blame from junior
2. defuses Clinton help for dem candidates (questions to him use up all the oxygen, so candidates may not want him around)
3. reignites the clinton=bad connection (hits Hillary)

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DU AdBot (1000+ posts)

Mon May 06th 2024, 09:19 AM
Response to Original message

Advertisements [?]

Top

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.