Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who do you trust more: Musharraf or Karzai (Afghanistan)?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
varun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 10:08 PM
Original message
Who do you trust more: Musharraf or Karzai (Afghanistan)?
Both are openly criticizing each other while having dinner with Bush. Musharraf called Karzai an "Ostrich". Karzai blames Pakistan for supporting Taliban. Both hate each other. Bush calls them "Friends" :eyes:

In my opinion, Musharraf is a liar. His country (Pakistan) had destabilized Afghanistan before 2001 by creating Taliban. Under US pressure, Musharraf changed course and stopped supporting Taliban. But Musharraf is back at it again. Pakistan is still training Jihadis in its madrassahs and wants to control Afghanistan by using Taliban.

No wonder Karzai and most Afghanis look at Musharraf and Pakistan with suspicion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'd Trust...
Richard M. Nixon far more than either of those two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignacio Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. Did some elements of the Pakistani government know about 9/11 in advance?
I heard that 9/11 Press for Truth speculates Pakistani knowledge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
razors edge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. Musharraf is a dictator with nukes in the ME.
Karzai is the mayor of Kandahar with oil, heroin and cia connections.

sorta like Travolta and Cage in Face Off, We gotta sticky predickyment here.

Musharraf has a tougher job. He has to play the part of dictator with all his national might under his control, whether it is or not, and try to continue pleasing washington so he is referred to as a president in the US media (while chavez is called a dictator) all the while keeping in mind what happens to puppet dictators when washington has no further use of them. (Saddam)

Karzai knows he will be surrounded and protected by SS and blackwater and no matter what happens he has a place to retire and hang out with like minded souls like Ken Lay.

Gaining control of a pipeline from the caspian sea through Afghanistan will be the only long term goal for either of these gentlemen (and I use the term loosely) and they will kill anyone they need to, and allow the killing of their own when need be, to achieve those goals.

Gutting the Al quiada in Pakistan takes a tool out of their bag. One that scares the shit out of the Americans. Taking opium out of Afghanistan takes a tool out of their bag.

Meanwhile our own government allows both of these threats to the American people to exist. They dance around the issues with bright sparkly diversions jockeying for control of whatever outcome and allowing our own to become casualties from the threats, and using those threats to control us.

That whole theory would have sounded a lot more tin foil six years ago wouldn't it?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. Karzai. Musharraf is a serial liar and a dictator.
Karzai is trying to make the best of a very bad situation, and has been betrayed by Bush and is being cut off at the knees by Pakistan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-27-06 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. Musharraf and Bush have an understanding
Musharraf has long ago told Bush he can't get Bin Laden, and Bush has settled for smaller fish.

Karzai is more of a pest to Bush.

My best answer to your question, is that we have more control over Karzai, but I have no opinion on their morals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC