Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Enough of this patronizing "no hyperbole" BS!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 09:15 PM
Original message
Enough of this patronizing "no hyperbole" BS!
Edited on Sun Oct-01-06 09:32 PM by fujiyama
I'm so sick of hearing several DUers constantly preaching that it's wrong to use the word "pedophile" in the case of this scandal.

Are some people here so naive as to believe the repukes wouldn't be using the word constantly? Already we're seeing the likes of Hume and others trying to compare to this Monica and some idiot DUers are going with that as well.

Guess what? Nobody gives a shit about the semantic games. Ask a majority of Americans what they think and they'll tell you that any fifty something year old going after 15 year olds is one sick fuck.

I'm angry. This behavior is appaling and frankly I don't care about using the correct "technical" term. Fuck it. I want blood. I smell it. And using whatever words there are in the English language to describe his actions. Foley is a pedophile and his party protects them, just like the Catholic church did with the preists. Let the GOP play the game of semantics - Let their tagline be "technically we weren't protecting a pedophile".

And hyperbole WINS ELECTIONS. Since when was politics NOT about hyperbole? Dirty politics wins. We're all in the mud. Get used to it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. I am a liberal ....
and I said no such things ....

I know you are angry ... but perhaps you protest too much ? ...

Honestly : what percentage of Liberals/Democrats/DUers are offending you right now ? ...

100 % ? .... 75 % ? ..... 20 % ? ..... 1 % ? ....

You are railing against 'liberals', yet most of us agree with you ....

WTF .....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. Agreed it's just a small section of DUers
I'm just surprised someone would find the need to constantly "correct" people for using a term which on the face of it is pretty accurate.

Sometimes it's not about a legal argument. Whether he's technically a pedophile or not, is irrelavent at this point. It's about perception and if that's what wins Dems control of congress so be it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeffR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. Righteous rant! K & R!
You're absolutely correct.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. OT - Damn that is one friggin' powerful graphic you have there
SHIT! I just sat here and stared at it for the longest time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niallmac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. No kidding. Why is that POS still POTUS?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeffR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Thank you, Sydnie
:hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Agree! That would make a hell of a billboard on a lot of freeways!
Says it all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. Its OK to bat this stuff around on the Internets...
People come here to rant, and bicker and such. We won't be the ones drawing up the indictments. Who gives a shit if some people here disagree on semantics?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. Ummmm, With All Due Respect:
"I'm so sick of hearing several DUers constantly preaching that it's wrong to use the word "pedophile" in the case of this scandal."

Others are so sick of several DU'ers agressively preaching otherwise.

"Are some people here so naive as to believe the repukes wouldn't be using the word constantly?"

Strawman. I've yet to see anyone claim such ridiculousness.

"Already we're seeing the likes of Hume and others trying to compare to this Monica and some idiot DUers are going with that as well."

Again, are you making things up? I've yet to see any DU'er compare this to Monica.

"Guess what? Nobody gives a shit about the semantic games."

Ummmmm, looks like you do. You're playing them right now.

"Ask a majority of Americans what they think and they'll tell you that any fifty something year old going after 15 year olds is one sick fuck."

Everyone here agrees. I've yet to see anyone claim he isn't a sick fuck. Wow, so far you're not doin to well on accuracy. And besides, this was about the semantics of pedophelia correct? Stay focused.

"Only liberals could be so stupid to bicker about things like this."

Yet you just started a willfully provocative thread to propogate it even further. Interesting.


"If this is the argument that takes hold rather, then this country and the people that make up the party are more stupid than I ever believed."

See response above.

"I'm angry."

So are all of us.

"This behavior is appaling and frankly I don't care about using the correct "technical" term."

Yes you do. You just started an emotional thread on it based on how much you care.

"Fuck it. I want blood. I smell it. And using whatever words there are in the English language to describe his actions."

Course, using the right words would probably be a good start.

"Foley is a pedophile"

Under most people's understanding of a pedophile, no he isn't. He certainly is a sick fuck though.

"and his party protects them, just like the Catholic church did with the preists.""

That they do. Cause they're all fucking scumbags. That much I'll agree with ya on.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I'm One of Those DUers Who Called Monica an Apt Comparison
For the sole reason I'm not positive anything illegal took place.

So sue me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. No it's not an apt comparison
I won't sue you but I'll tell ya that there is NO comparison whatsoever.

There is a huge difference between consensual sex and harassement.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. You called it, OMC. I haven't seen DUers "constantly preaching it's
wrong to use the word pedophile" and I've been on and off the board all day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
13. Let the Republicans come on TV and explain the difference...
...between a pedophile and someone who is attracted sexually to kids.

That is their job. Not ours. I can't wait to hear their explanation. I will even keep an open mind. Lets hear it from the GOPers not DUers.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC