Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hastert etal will say "We Can't Comment on Ongoing Criminal Investigation"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 08:29 AM
Original message
Hastert etal will say "We Can't Comment on Ongoing Criminal Investigation"
That is why Hastert is asking for a "full" criminal investigation which includes those "outside" Congress.

That will allow them to stall the Ethics Investigation within the House until after the midterm elections. They have sealed the office, computers, files of Foley's office.

And this investigation will allow them to search for those who provided the information to ABC News, and interrogate reporters to find the leak and punish them.

This is not playing defense, this is part of the push back and hiding of information until after the midterm elections are played out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Greeby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. Is Hastert channelling Simply Scotty?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Well It Ain't Kickball -- They screwed up the cover stories, now....
...the first order of business is to stop people from talking, coordinate the stories, and put a news blackout in place to deelevate this from page one and the MSM.

All the typical levers of manipulating public opinion, but front and center is to make it drop from public interest by starving the story of new information and diverting the public's attention to another topic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Double T Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
2. What else would WE expect from our criminal congress,......
WH and injustice department?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Justice Dept will run interference to 'slow walk' its investigation...
... and provide protection for top Repubs who have muddied the water so far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Double T Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Agreed!! When the injustice department aid and abet......
the criminals, YOU KNOW YOU'VE GOT A PROBLEM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
5. The media will get out of their control
it already has... the republicans are flailing
trying to get ahead of this scandal.
It's hilarious.. and they keep trying their old tricks...
bwhahahaha.. they are so predictable
and SUCH LOSERS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Just remember, a few well-paced calls to the MSM and poof! Its gone
... there are already movements to marginalize GOP wrongdoing, give those who covered up a pass, and starve this story for new information.

Next up? How Dems are using a tragedy for political purposes --
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
6. At Least It's Possible There Will Be a Criminal Investigation!
The odds were against such things, until recently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Well now, let's be realistic here ....
...what is there to investigate here? Foley will go down after being exposed, but the House Repub Leadership who covered this up have a better chance of winning the lottery every week for the next year than getting charged with any wrongdoing arising out of the DOJ investigation of this matter.

The DOJ is a lever they are pulling for cover, not to actually reveal anything the House Repub Leadership does not want exposed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
9. am i missing something here..this was a crime..it was not classified
info...

i see no way anyone could be a leaker when it was exposing a criminal..

this was not national security..in fact i would say exposing this protected our national security..since Foley could have been blackmailed by a foreign country or entity..

i do not think there is a law that says if you know about a crime, you can not come forward about it..in fact if one didn't come forward..that would or should be a crime ...unless it is classified..and then the person would have to go into the whistle blower protection prgm

but did a law get passed i missed that says..if you catch a congress person committing pedophilia against a child..it is top secret??

i feel strongly about this..i think whoever went to abc ..IS A HERO TO CHILDREN!! AND DID THE RIGHT THING!!


FLY
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. The "leaking" is not national security related, however ....
.... dollars to doughnuts that this information was well known among Repub House Leaders for a long time, with a proverbial lid placed on the dissemination of that information publicly.

Most likely members of Congress, the pages themselves, and reporters and newspapers knew, and whoever violated the unwritten rule against "leaking" this information must be found and punished for being the traitors to their party that they are. Otherwise, you cannot get total compliance from the Repub Party to back what Bush wants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. WELL "CREW " HAD COPIES OF THE EMAILS THIS SUMMER
they went to the FBI with them...

it could have been anyone with "crew" who told ABC..or it could have been any one of the children that went to ABC..
orrr someone in the FBI..

hell it could have been alll of them..or one of them!!

this isn't a "leak"..this is truth...truth about crimes to children..

fuck party..its about children's safety..and welfare..

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. IMHO This is the Most Likely Source of the Outing of Foley ....
...It really is the most astounding fact revealed thus far, and most people are glossing right over it.

IF the FBI had this since summer from CREW or any other source, then the entire FBI is complicit for not taking action to protect underage pages who remained in close personal contact with Foley.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. hell it was in st pete times yesterday or saturday that they knew last
fall and never reported it!

St Pete Times knew (Foley) Nov.2005..Held story


..........they knew some info but held it.........they knew in Nov 2005



In November, the St. Petersburg Times contacted U.S. Rep. Rodney Alexander, R-La., after obtaining a series of e-mails from Foley to one of Alexander's former pages. In one of the e-mails, Foley had requested the page's photo, and the page forwarded the e-mails to an Alexander staffer asking if he was right to see it as "sick, sick, sick, sick."

Foley told the Times it was an innocent exchange, and Alexander told the Times in November he was unaware of the matter until the newspaper called. The Times never published a story, and never saw sexually explicit e-mails from Foley.

The "internal review" released by Hastert on Saturday says in fall 2005, Alexander's chief of staff contacted the Speaker's Office about Foley's e-mail exchange and that Alexander was concerned about it. The speaker's deputy chief of staff and in-house counsel told Alexander's aide to contact the House clerk, who oversees the page program.

http://www.sptimes.com/2006/10/01/State/Scandal_leaves_...


they are just as complicit in the crimes i believe!!

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC