Freeperland IMPLODING!

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1712215/posts?q=1&&page=1

:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

The IMs with a teenager about when and where they'll see each other again, dinner, what else?, etc.

:rofl:

To: TeleStraightShooter

apparently the time line is:

Emails are brought to the attention of Hassert which are NOT sexual in nature. These non sexual emails (house email system) are refered to the page department director. This is around Dec. 2005.

LAST WEEK: Instant Messages, NOT TO BE CONFUSED WITH THE DISTINCT EMAIL SYSTEM, are revealed. It appears Democrats sat on the child solicitation Instant Messages (not emails) for THREE YEARS before revealing them the day after foley's name could not be dropped.

Foley resigns after house leadership learns of instant messages, (not emails).

162 posted on 10/02/2006 1:21:39 PM MDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)

And how the hell can Democrats get access to Aim-conversations? They were either saved by the kid or by Foley the pervert himself. Or someone supervised it. And I doubt that the Dems are in charge of something like that.
Uh the bad Dems sitting on the infos for 3 years..did they never think about the children?

Democrats are evil and only think of electoral advantage and never consider the general welfare of the nation.

However, this assumes that Democrats must be pretty dumb, because if they had the information three years ago, they would have used to their advantage in the 2004 election.

I'm surprised these loonies aren't trying to spin this into a Democrat writing these messages in order to frame Foley and set up the Republican leadership. It makes about as much sense.

Don't try to argue with them, either. Some of them are still convinced that WMDs will be found in Iraq, that Bush never tells a lie and that Andy Stevenson is alive sipping pina coladas in on his private South Pacific island.

And there budget deficits don't matter because the tooth fairy will take care of it.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x2287743

although they are trying to protect everyone but Foley (another GAY). Please go and comment on this incredible post on DU. It's really the most outrageous post I've ever seen put forth as truth (or even verifiable) on DU. Good way to see who the Freepers on DU are (or those less able to see a freight train coming at them)

K & R on that.

LGF is claiming that the messages were altered. So they are already trying to claim that the Dems faked the messages and set Foley up. But then why would Foley resign in such a hurry, and why would his Repub colleagues slam him and admit that they had heard about some things months and even years ago?

That ought to be good.

They were there. We found them. Didn't you know?

Its the Liberal Media, keeping the information secret in order to prop up the Dems.

It rarely makes any sense at all.

The Democrats held the IMs until now just to use it to political advantage to cover-up the terrorists tapes from 2000 when BILL CLINTON was president!!

Spin baby spin...

Even the host wasn't buying it...he even said, but why would the Democrats release it now, they got the Woodward book coming out getting overlooked because of it...

Yep folks, it is the pass the buck administration...no matter what, it is always the democrats fault!

TeleStraightShooter ... what the hell is that?

Those poor widdle fweepers never ever put the responsibility where it belongs, while Dems are always too willing to kick themselves over things for which they have no fault. Jeebers.

How is it getting "worse"? Foley was outed and he's gone. You seen the democrats drop anybody who's under an ethical cloud? We've dropped FOUR people already.

That's the message to take to the people in November. Of the 4 biggest GOP targets of wrongdoing, all four are GONE.

of the 5 biggest DEM targets of wrongdoing, all are still in power.

We are the party that takes action when wrongdoing is found. The Dems are the party that looks the other way and won't discipline their own in a meaningful way.

as theirs. The only one that I think needs clarification is the Studs-Pelosi thingie. Why was Studs allowed to stay when he had a liaison with a 17 year old boy?

or at least ALTERED!!
and the pages? they sure LOOK old enough!


and this old canard:This is nothing that the Democrats haven't been doing for years! Only the all-powerful Dem party gets the guilty off and names buildings after them!!!

:rofl:

I didn't need that picture.

they thought Clinton was sooooo disgusting... He's not a normal, red-blooded gay pedophile.

Please tell me I'm misreading your post.

Gay has to do with everything when it's the exact opposite of what one pretends to stand for. I'm not against gay. I'm against false representation. You need to check out the various interviews Foley has done to see what I mean.

That being said, "gay pedophile" means (to me) that he wasn't chasing underage female pages. There is a difference between gay and straight. There is also a difference between being anti-gay and pointing out the fact that someone lies about who they are. Is that ever a good thing? It's sick. Being gay is NOT sick, but lying about and covering up who you are is sick.

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Don't they know bush don't need no stinkin' warrent?

you just have to cut a hole in the right tube. you have to be very careful.

Warrants are bad things unless they protect Repukes.

And no, Freeper Moran, the emails were forwarded by the recipient.

..."brb" :rofl:

That's sooo pre-9/11.

n/t

sigh....

I say "sensed" because it was so flatly unfunny. However, it wouldn't surprise me if the author thought he was being clever by equating IMs and emails that were provided by angry Congressional pages with warrantless surveillance of American citizens within our borders.

What a moran.

'My heros have always been cowboys-Reagan and Bush'

Now that's some real bronc-bustin' role models!

wouldn't that be more accurate for them to say a Hollywood "actor" and an east coast rich boy?

then again, truthiness was never their strong suit.

All Hat and No Cattle

:rofl:

That's not very cowboy-like of him.

the substance. Truthiness is precisely their strong point. Truth is what they can't manage.

I wonder if one of them is behind this pic of bush I was emailed a while back.

and it look's like he is about to cry.

Shrub looks a bit teary eyed too.

Hi, there merh! I hope you're doing well. :hug:

that poor pony - can you imagine how Babs probably beat that creature into submission because he acted out, and who wouldn't when that little evil things is near them, let alone on their back. :scared:


I'm doing good, still hoping and trying, still plugging along! :hi:

thanks for the well wishes :hug:

For pete's sake! :rofl:

he was brave and didn't cry, like he wanted to (see his eyes welling up)

Reagan was an outdoorsman and he rode horses but that isn't a cowboy and W....no not even close

Don't tell anyone.

Just asking...

They're all "Foley Artists" to me (that is: artificial noise-makers).

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x2859867 for your consideration...

that their brave hero Georgie is afeared of horsies. Not much of a cowboy in my estimation. We have friends and family who are cowboys, real cowboys(my hubby has helped) on round-ups and branding time. They must be talking about those fake cowboys who wear the clothes, swagger and tell some Pecos Bill tall tales.

The release of e-mails, written by Foley, is a 'little too convenient'? Like, the Dems released them?:silly:
Oh, and equating ABC to a DNC organ; now that's rich! :)

He had some conspiracy theory today that this information MUST have been in the hands of a Democrat (like that's who "leaked it"), so it's THEIR FAULT this info was hidden for so long, so it's the DEMOCRATS that were trying to keep a lid on Foley's indiscretions so it's THEY who should get in trouble.

Rush's logic baffles the hell out of me. That guy is spinning so fast right now that he might form his own galaxy.

I love it. May I steal it?

this is indicitive of this group's mindset.

:rofl:

NGU.

are representative of the "My mind is already made up-don't confuse me with FACTS!" type of people.

:D

Geez, I thought the minimum skills required to be a fuckin' cowboy is that you shouldn't be afraid of horses.

GWB is afraid of horses, but he is OK with milking male horses, according to his wife.

-85% Jimmy

Conservatives are (a) like little old ladies who are always "sensing" burglars under their beds, and (b) little boys who hope their transgressions will be excused if they mention that other little boys have transgressed at times in the past.

What the Frepers are NOT is grown, mature, responsible adults who can look facts in the eye and accept things as they really are.

"You seen the democrats drop anybody who's under an ethical cloud? We've dropped FOUR people already."

How can this guy breathe with his head in the sand like that?

:rofl:

" LEt me say this. I am getting sort of tired of how the media is being clumsy with the facts here.

Is this a email or a IM for instance. Again it is a minor point but frustrating

In a matters like this these pesky details matter "


Then someone answers him/her/it and says,

"LOL, believe me, if this were a Dem, NO WAY would the MSM be clumsy with these fact."

I'm assuming that "LGF" is "Little Green Footballs". Like I said, that post bothers me. I wonder if they're going to "Dan Rather" this story and attempt to say that the instant messages between Foley and the teens are fabricated. If so, that's what the media will focus on.

I didn't see that! Dear GOD! :rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

But no, the messages ABC has gotten come ultimately from the pages themselves. There's no way they can do a Buckhead on this one.

It's hard to keep up with everything about this situation because it's not news in the UK and everything I'm finding out about it comes from you guys and the MSM on the internets. I know there's a lot of it that I've missed, for example, not knowing that the info actually came from the pages.

I have two questions I'd like to ask, if you don't mind:

1) When did the instant message exchanges take place? I thought it was just a year or two ago, but I've read freeper posts that say it was in 2000-2001 (as if to them that excuses Foley's behavior somehow).

2) What does "Buckhead" mean? (I'm completely out of it on that one.)

Thanks in advance.

memos as being typographically anchronistic. That's all I know.

--IMM

with the Rather saga.

After he'd published part of just the one on his blog. I think their provenance is pretty much unassailable.

Don't let these mush brains rope you in.

If this were all a fabrication, he would have fought it.

His swift resignation flies in the face of all the freeper hand-wringing.

Foley bailed out ASAP after he was exposed and checked into alcohol rehab. You can stick a fork in this one.

The Freepers will remain delusional and continue to deny everything until it dies down. For all their bullshit about "moral relativism" they are the ultimate relativists when it comes to simple truth.

as he tried to shutdown the recount in his district

To: massgopguy

This was a two party conversation and given to ABC by one which depending on state could be illegal.

29 posted on 10/02/2006 10:54:40 AM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies >


That's it. Let's arrest the child who had the nerve to report foley's "overly friendly" comments. That sounds fair to me.

was trying to say! "...by one which depending on state could be illegal."

that I heard that there are about eight aides who have come forward? So, yeah, great meo-con thinking. Let's arrest the victims, by God. That will learn them!!!

is tiny little freeper brains exploding all over the U.S.

my mistake, they sound similar.

:spray:

"Was there a Warrant issued to wire-tap these e-mails?"

Someone posted a picture of Elton John and his dude and another person wrote:

"Neither of them look at all underage to me."


This one is good. Proud that 4 repubs already stepped down..LOL

"How is it getting "worse"? Foley was outed and he's gone. You seen the democrats drop anybody who's under an ethical cloud? We've dropped FOUR people already."


And then someone calls it a setup. :eyes: Yeah, the dems turned Foley into a pervert. We are a very powerful bunch.

"Foley walked right into it, but it looks to me like a setup. I wonder how long it takes before someone gets ahold of the DNS info and finds out where the IM's were really coming from."


And then this.. What pass?

"The MSM gives liberals a pass but not conservatives. That's an outrage."


Here is a good one:

"My understanding is that the emails are also a bit weird, but not disgusting. They're sort of thing a principal would call a teacher in about and say something like, "You know, you need to be careful.""




Well, there's a few.

To: Dianna
"We have many trolls working on this overtime."

to realize that...(edited!) :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

trying to see what might stick.

I don't see how you came to the conclusion that they are imploding.

They have expressed their disgust with the man and cut him loose. In fact they even seem to be planning to use this against us

To: huck von finn
How is it getting "worse"? Foley was outed and he's gone. You seen the democrats drop anybody who's under an ethical cloud? We've dropped FOUR people already.

That's the message to take to the people in November. Of the 4 biggest GOP targets of wrongdoing, all four are GONE.

of the 5 biggest DEM targets of wrongdoing, all are still in power.

We are the party that takes action when wrongdoing is found. The Dems are the party that looks the other way and won't discipline their own in a meaningful way.



22 posted on 10/02/2006 12:51:52 PM CDT by CharlesWayneCT
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse >

Don't think it will work, but they certainly don't seem to have lost their moorings in any way (any further way, I should say)

:scared:

It was a legitimate observation. You may think there is no need to worry, and maybe there isn't, but they are not, IMO, imploding.

I think you can call that "implosion", or at least damned close.

Rahtergate stick. At least long enough.

But the most of the rest of them...WHAT COULD "THEY" DO TO "US"?

:scared: :hide:

in NOvember

As transparent as interstellar vacuum.

conclusions, don't you?

If you think the FReepers are imploding, fine. I think you are underestimating them. That's no reason for calling out.

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

Just because I don't agree that the FReepers are imploding, and think we should not get overconfident, that makes me... what? A FReeper troll?

Oh, yeah, I can so totally see that now. :sarcasm:

:shrug:

somebody doth protest too much. "we'll see come November". you forgot that bit.

and thanks for the sarcasm tag, i was lost without it.

was going on. Don be disingenuous. It''s not becoming.

As for my comment, I wasn't hoping for an R victory. I was simply saying that we will see whether or not they imploded.

If they lose the House, well, that's expected. But if they implode, they will lose it by very wide margins. If they lose only by a few seats, or if they retain control, then they didn't implode, at all.

Which brings me to another point. It doesn't really matter if the FReeps implode, what matters is if their leadership implodes. I don't have a feel for that just yet, so I won't offer an opinion, just yet.

i think a muuuhahahahah would be more appropriate.

and explain away the allegations from the Reagan-Bush era. They can go google the Lincoln S&L scandal, which was exposed by a decent Republican in Nebraska. Or maybe they can google for the front page Washington Times article on boy prostitution ring at WH. Everything so conveniently swept under the rug--but I'm sure they have explanations for everything. Did anyone send list of Repug pervs? It's not that all repug are pervs, but why do most pervs gravitate to the repug party? Now that's the question. The perception of good vs evil, one who cannot confront the shadow side of themselves (as we all have one)-so that even while they are doing not nice things, it's the other persons fault or someone made them do it-they cannot see their own evil, for in their mind they are always good, and always right. "Beware of the self-righteous person, for they are the most dangerous of all."

to keep their incompetent criminal pResident out of jail!

Not.

:rofl:

have to do with my comment?? I fail to follow your "logic"

"We are the party that takes action when wrongdoing is found. The Dems are the party that looks the other way and won't discipline their own in a meaningful way."

:rofl:

I misunderstood.:)

:)

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

misunderstood. I'm done.

the lack of action when the republican leadership found out months ago that this was happening?

To me that is (a little) worse than what Foley was doing.

What are the freepers saying about that?

is jsut as bad, and probably more harmful politically.

I don't know what they are saying. My comments and opinions are limited to what I read at the time I followed the link, where it did not seem to me that they are imploding. Maybe they are now, but I'm don't know.

when freepers defend pedophiles, that's textbook implosion. When they blame others for their sickness, that's implosion. That's what they are doing.

I'll make one more post to you.

MY use of the word "imploding" implies that they are worried and frantic, not that they are going crazy or illogical. Weren't they that to begin with?

I'll accept your apolgy now.

3 results for: implode
View results from: Dictionary | Thesaurus | Encyclopedia | the Web

Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.0.1) - Cite This Source
im‧plode /ɪm'ploʊd/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation verb, -plod‧ed, -plod‧ing.

–verb (used without object) 1. to burst inward (opposed to explode).
–verb (used with object) 2. Phonetics. to pronounce by implosion.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.0.1)
Based on the Random House Unabridged Dictionary, © Random House, Inc. 2006.
American Heritage Dictionary - Cite This Source im·plode (m-pld) Pronunciation Key
v. im·plod·ed, im·plod·ing, im·plodes
v. intr.
To collapse inward violently.

v. tr.
To cause to collapse inward violently.
To demolish (a building) by causing to collapse inward.




(Download Now or Buy the Book) The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company.
Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
WordNet - Cite This Source
implode

v : burst inward; "The bottle imploded"

WordNet ® 2.0, © 2003 Princeton University

"Lets meet the Pages

I want to se em up close and personal

(scratch that it might be misconstrued)


I would like them to be interviewed on TV"


Hmm, this person really wants to see these kids. And there's the implication that the kids are lying; right, trust a pedophilic Republican over a teenager.

I'm sure this individual would like to see female rape victims "interviewed on TV" as well -- but only if the perpetrator is a Republican..

are parents. :scared:

came today from El Rushbo himself. ;-)

the other pedophile who was caught some months back, he was the head of the homeland security the sexual predators unit. Aren't these some of the same people who loved ABC when they made the fake clinton movie? LOL. :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

it's difficult to keep up!

remember bush's right hand man who was caught stealing in target, home depot I can't remember which store.

"That's the message to take to the people in November. Of the 4 biggest GOP targets of wrongdoing, all four are GONE.

of the 5 biggest DEM targets of wrongdoing, all are still in power. "


Which 5 would those be?

?

:wtf: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Umm....yeah, what kind of equation was that freeper using?

They can't even spell that right!


>>>Guys like this can't control themselves. If queers had any self control they would not let other men put their thingy up their backside much less then next put it in their mouth after that.>>>

Do people who use the term "thingy" really need to be so damn graphic?

That person has been reading too many of Foley's text messages.

its those dirty rats who blow the whistle on lawbreakers that bother Repigs

I did not know that!

To: yldstrk
I have not been following this story but when were the messages sent and when did that DNC news organ - ABC - learn about them and by who?
13 posted on 10/02/2006 10:48:58 AM PDT by TeleStraightShooter (The Right To Take Life is NOT a Constitutional "Liberty" protected by the 14th Amendment)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies >

:shrug:

That's like "I eat pieces of shit like you for breakfast!"

"Er...you eat pieces of shit for breakfast?"


(Courtesy of the Owen Wilson movie in Hawaii, though I'd heard it before)

Er...no thanks, buddy...you can keep your weirdo perverts...:rofl:

What backwash genepool did those freepers form in?

They seem the best argument ever refuting the concept of social promotion in the public schools.

"By the way, that's been the goal of the queer groups for about 3 decades now. To make sure that you don't ever talk about the "graphic" part of being "gay" but only focus on the love and flowers and dancing together hand in hand in fields of chocolates* part. And America has been suckers* for that idea. Case in point, imagine if tomorrow that the hit TV show "queer eye for the straight guy" started showing the fags tongue kissing or crotch grabbing or worse. The who would be in the toilet in an eyeblink."

What vile, hate-filled subhuman cave-dwellers freepers are. Perfect arguments for birth control.

He says it's too tempting for members of Congress.

I thought I would :puke:



That tradition was created during a time where it was acceptable for a 16 person to engage in sex with much older man. That situation is now highly illegal.

It is almost never a good idea to have underage children with adults in a non-group environment. This is especially true for politicians who as a group tend to have a attitude of "the laws are for public, they don't apply to me".

I'm sure in most cases the experience is a very positive one for the page, but it the concept is just asking for trouble. If the page program should continue it should be made up of college interns.
261 posted on 10/02/2006 3:49:37 PM MDT by JeffAtlanta



I don't disagree with what you're saying as I do think the the "every man is a potential predator" thing has gone too far.

An adult that spends time alone with an underage child is just asking for trouble though. Heck, in today's climate even an adult that goes to watch a little league baseball game without a child playing there is just asking to be investigated as a potential molester.

The country has enough things to worry about. Providing our lawmakers the temptation of underage boys and girls who idolize them prancing around the capital seems to be just one distraction we really don't need.

It may be a great experience for a lot of the young people but it hurts the country as a whole as it puts "bait" in the range of our lawmakers who are the least able to resist temptation like that. For whatever reason, politicians tend to be very weak morally and putting underage bait in front of them is just asking for trouble.
266 posted on 10/02/2006 4:13:34 PM MDT by JeffAtlanta

I'd stop laughing and realize they are using this to spin against us, like they do everything.

:shrug:

Some of the comments are sick!

...To: yldstrk
I have not been following this story but when were the messages sent and when did that DNC news organ - ABC - learn about them and by who?

13 posted on 10/02/2006 10:48:58 AM PDT by TeleStraightShooter (The Right To Take Life is NOT a Constitutional "Liberty" protected by the 14th Amendment


ABC IS A DNC NEWS ORGAN?! I DO NOT THINK SO.

Those freepers are a mess and out of their g-ddamn mind.

. . . is a DNC news organ.

These guys just let go of the "librul media" fable.

those fascist-supporting bastards have a LOT of nerve

now even they know it :rofl:

Democrats taking advantage or Foley molesting teenage boys?


IT'S THE PEDOPHILIA, STUPID!

Since they expect us to enjoy this and rub it in, we may as well indulge them!

About their own email and IM trails.

!?

Like a typical conservative male of any orientation., he might well just insist on unequal relationships in general.

is part of the story that needs to be told. And that in some degree, paints the kid in a bad light.


Wow... really doesn't understand that that is part of the reason why Foley targeted him... And why people like Foley are so dangerous.

HE TOOK ADVANTAGE OF THE KID TO SATISFY HIS OWN PROBLEMS!!!