"Foley Was Determined to Strike in the US"

Proud2BAmurkin

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Oct-02-06 03:48 PM
Original message

"Foley Was Determined to Strike in the US"

The rePUKES are trying to sell that they're clean because even though they knew Foley was a predator they hadn't seen any explicit IMs.

"Bin Laden determined to strike in the US"

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

sweetheart

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Oct-02-06 03:51 PM
Response to Original message

1. screw them over here, not over there!

They're looking for bin laden in the bumholes of pages.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

dchill

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Oct-02-06 03:53 PM
Response to Original message

2. Anyone or anything "Determined to Strike in the US"...

is something Republicans encourage and use to their advantage. In an illegal manner, of course.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

BurgherHoldtheLies

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Oct-02-06 03:54 PM
Response to Original message

3. On the same wavelength....

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=364&topic_id=2273729&mesg_id=2277684

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Red Zelda

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Oct-02-06 03:55 PM
Response to Original message

4. The vapid Freek-tards

...wouldn't know an explicit IM if it crawled into their inflatable girlfriends and left a Hastert-sized fart.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Nimrod2005

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Oct-02-06 03:57 PM
Response to Original message

5. I think the GOP decided we would molest them over here so that we don't

have to molest them over there!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

whistle

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Oct-02-06 03:58 PM
Response to Original message

6. They wanted photos of Foley engaged in buggery with pages I

...suppose, and then like the Abu Ghraib prison photos they would have denied even then that any such photos were real

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

sweetheart

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Oct-02-06 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #6

8. Those photos have been leaked

A whole photo album of mobile phone snaps has been kept by one of the pages,
and the republicans are using the spying laws to stop him from exposing their
grooming of children for republican rough sex.

There is no question when you see Foley standing there helping the page
in the congressional bathroom. OneEighty has given us a blessing from
beyond the grave, its a sign that the good guys really do win.

Its our job to sniff out those photos and get them out, before the republicans
find the page and silence their witness trail at gunpoint.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

whistle

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Oct-02-06 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #8

10. No shit, wow that is news

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

JuniperLea

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Oct-02-06 03:59 PM
Response to Original message

7. They never saw the blow job either

So I guess Clinton is off the hook?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Bluebear

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Oct-02-06 04:11 PM
Response to Original message

9. Nobody could have imagined a 52 year old man getting a teen boy horny!

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

calimary

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Oct-02-06 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #9

11. EEEeeewwww. I did, however, see something in all the reading

I've done on this story that quoted one of the pages (or maybe it was a former page) who said that the age of the kids involved here means they're less impressionable and more likely to see exactly what this is and be grossed out by it. Thank heavens for small favors (so to speak).

Here's my take on it, humbly submitted...

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x2859867

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DU AdBot (1000+ posts)

Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:04 PM
Response to Original message

Advertisements [?]

Top

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.