Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Watching Countdown ...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Mme. Defarge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-03-06 07:25 PM
Original message
Watching Countdown ...
Did Howard Fineman just say that there was concern that the reason the FBI might be trying to contact as many pages in the Foley scandal that they could find was to threaten them to keep quiet?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-03-06 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's always about the coverup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mme. Defarge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-03-06 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. While I do love conspiracy theories,
I must admit I was shocked that the mainstream media would be so matter-of-fact about the federal law enforcement community deliberately impeding a criminal investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patricia92243 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-03-06 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes, you heard right. Hope somebody grabs hold of this. I assume he had so
some reason for saying this. What?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-03-06 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Because the FBI stonewalled, failed to take action
on the e-mails sent by CREW?

CREW URGES DOJ I.G. TO PROBE WHY FBI FAILED TO INVESTIGATE FOLEY EMAILS SENT BY CREW THIS SUMMER
Administration Officials Must Explain Lack of Action

Washington, DC – Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) wrote to the Department of Justice Inspector General’s office today to ask for an investigation into why the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) failed to begin investigating Rep. Mark Foley’s emails to a former House page as soon as the Bureau learned about the emails in July 2006.

On July 21, 2006 CREW received a set of emails, allegedly from Rep. Foley to a former House page, which it sent to the FBI later that day. The emails, posted at www.citizensforethics.org, asked the page, who had recently left the Hill, his age, how school was going and what he wanted for his birthday. Rep. Foley also requested the boy’s photograph.

“As a former prosecutor who handled sex crimes in the District of Columbia, the emails set off alarm bells. Grown men simply do not send emails requesting photographs to teenagers over whom they have had some degree of authority,” Melanie Sloan, executive director of CREW wrote today.

It appears only now, at the instigation of the House of Representatives leadership’s request, that the FBI has begun a preliminary investigation into former Rep. Foley’s conduct. Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert sent a letter to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales requesting an investigation into Rep. Foley’s actions as well as who knew about Rep. Foley’s conduct, when they knew it and why they did not forward that information to law enforcement authorities.

more at:
http://www.citizensforethics.org/press/newsrelease.php?...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-03-06 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. I've long been under the impression...
that the FBI works for the Republican Party - since the days of J. Edgar. It seems to me that it's their JOB to threaten these pages. They're sitting on more evidence than they've ever actually released. And I'm NOT just talking about Foleygate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mme. Defarge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-03-06 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Perhaps I'm naive,
but it seems almost like a paradigm shift when the MSM portrays intimidating witnesses as simply all in a day's work for the FBI. It wasn't that Fineman seemed to approve of it, it's just that if it is true, it's really quite horrifying. He mentioned it in such an offhand way that it momentarily didn't register.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-03-06 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Just like the "offhand way" ...
that so many lies and crimes are cast as merely "Business As Usual" for the GOP ruling class. They have stolen three national elections in a row, but anyone who reports it is labeled a conspiracy theorist. Fineman is still a journalist, but it's only news, after all, not a Rove press release.

Your paradigm shift is actually the end of American Democracy. I don't think that has quite registered yet, either. And no one who perceives that horrifying news hides in the bland, offhand statements of today's newsheads can possibly be naive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mme. Defarge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-03-06 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Thanks.
I mean, if the reality is that we now, officially, have secret police isn't a "hair on fire" situation, what is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-03-06 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. It's too bad the pages can get disappeared legally now. Can't
some uber-wealthy Dem provide protection for them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC