Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Shouldn't Foley identify the clergyman who he says molested him?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-03-06 08:17 PM
Original message
Shouldn't Foley identify the clergyman who he says molested him?
Edited on Tue Oct-03-06 08:17 PM by NNN0LHI
Or is he just going to let the guy continue molesting other kids and never identify him?

Something ain't right here.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NOLADEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-03-06 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. He was molested by someone....Sure seems made for TV that it was a priest
The guy who molested him is probably long dead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-03-06 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Then why not identify him? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-03-06 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. He'll say he's dead, so there's no point in naming him
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
koopie57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-03-06 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. if he is dead, so be it
but those kids Maf54 molested deserve to know the name of the person who started this. They were affected by him, they are entitled to know. If he can't name him, then I can't believe him. And if he was molested and starting having those feelings, he is even a bigger coward that I think he is cuz he knew what his actions were doing to the kids.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-03-06 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I agree ... but I doubt we'll get a name from him
:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Akoto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-03-06 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. If his claims are true ...
He states that he was molested between the ages of 13 and 15. So, that's going on 40 years ago.

If this isn't just a false excuse, then the priest in question is most likely dead or on death's doorstep already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-03-06 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. Did you see this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC