|
these guys, and it's not just these three, but they've all been in the news in the past few days, but all the media pundits loved bush, praised him, didn't ask any questions, and now, all of a sudden, they seem to "get it" and want, as matthews put it on letterman, "to put a leash on bush".
Read today's friedman article in the NY Times and tell me it doesn't make you a little sick to hear Friedman, who has been a promoter of the Iraq war, all of a sudden turn on bush. Why now?? Why not two years ago when it mattered?
And of course Woodward writes two fluffy praise missals, then finally decides to tell all. There were things he knew two years ago that are in the book that is coming out now. If only he had the guts to say two years ago what he's saying now.
I hope they have trouble sleeping at night.
And here's another point, if diebold is really stealing elections, would it kill these three influential journalists to look into the stories?? I honestly don't think it is diebold, etc., I think it is the lies that are told by the media, and these three have perpetuated, that have influenced the average voter. Remember back in '04, 75% of bush voters thought saddam had wmds. They thought saddam was involved in 9/11. That's a failure of the media to tell the truth.
|